PEMO-Q—A New Method for Objective Audio Quality Assessment Using a Model of Auditory Perception

A new method for the objective assessment and prediction of perceived audio quality is introduced. It represents an expansion of the speech quality measure qC, introduced by Hansen and Kollmeier, and is based on a psychoacoustically validated, quantitative model of the "effective" peripheral auditory processing by Dau et al. To evaluate the audio quality of a given distorted signal relative to a corresponding high-quality reference signal, the auditory model is employed to compute "internal representations" of the signals, which are partly assimilated in order to account for assumed cognitive aspects. The linear cross correlation coefficient of the assimilated internal representations represents the perceptual similarity measure (PSM). PSM shows good correlations with subjective quality ratings if different types of audio signals are considered separately, whereas a better accuracy of signal-independent quality prediction is achieved by a second quality measure PSMt represented by the fifth percentile of the sequence of instantaneous audio quality PSM(t). The new measures were evaluated using a large database of subjective listening tests that were originally carried out on behalf of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG) for the evaluation of various low bit-rate audio codecs. Additional tests with data unknown in the development phase of the model were carried out. Except for linear distortions, the new method shows a higher prediction accuracy than the ITU-R recommendation BS.1387 ("PEAQ") for the tested data

[1]  Ernst Eberlein,et al.  Analysis Tool for Realtime Measurements Using Perceptual Criteria , 1992 .

[2]  B. Paillard,et al.  PERCEVAL: Perceptual Evaluation of the Quality of Audio Signals , 1992 .

[3]  Gerhard Stoll,et al.  ISO-MPEG-1 Audio: A Generic Standard for Coding of High-: Quality Digital Audio , 1994 .

[4]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  de H Huib Ridder,et al.  Time-varying image quality : modelling the relation between instantaneous and overall quality , 1999 .

[6]  William C. Treurniet.  Simulation of Individual Listeners with an Auditory Model , 1996 .

[7]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Objective Modeling of Speech Quality with a Psychoacoustically Validated Auditory Model , 2000 .

[8]  Louis Thibault,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of High-Quality Audio Coding Systems: Methods and Results in the Two-Channel Case , 1995 .

[9]  Jean-Bernard Rault,et al.  A Perceptual Model Applied to Audio Bit-Rate Reduction , 1995 .

[10]  Thilo Thiede,et al.  A New Perceptual Quality Measure for Bit-Rate Reduced Audio , 1996 .

[11]  Thomas Sporer.  Objective Audio Signal Evaluation-Applied Psychoacoustics for Modeling the Perceived Quality of Digital Audio , 1997 .

[12]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system , 2001, Hearing Research.

[13]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality , .

[16]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Development and Validation of a Method for Predicting the Perceived Naturalness of Sounds Subjected to Spectral Distortion , 2004 .

[17]  T. Dau.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation , 1997 .

[18]  John G. Beerends,et al.  A Perceptual Audio Quality Measure Based on a Psychoacoustic Sound Representation , 1992 .

[19]  Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems , 2015 .

[20]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Predicting the Perceived Quality of Nonlinearly Distorted Music and Speech Signals , 2004 .

[21]  Rainer Huber,et al.  Objective assessment of audio quality using an auditory processing model , 2004 .

[22]  Markus Hauenstein.  Psychoakustisch motivierte Maße zur instrumentellen Sprachgütebeurteilung , 1997 .

[23]  Thomas Sporer,et al.  PEAQ - The ITU Standard for Objective Measurement of Perceived Audio Quality , 2000 .

[24]  Jens Berger.  Instrumentelle Verfahren zur Sprachqualitätsschätzung: Modelle auditiver Tests , 1998 .

[25]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Evaluation of the ITU-R Objective Audio Quality Measurement Method , 2000 .

[27]  Methods for objective and subjective assessment of quality Perceptual evaluation of speech quality ( PESQ ) : An objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs , 2002 .