A symmetry suppresses the cochlear catastrophe.

When the independent spatial variable is defined appropriately, the empirical finding that the phase of the cochlear input impedance is small [Lynch et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 108-130 (1982)] is shown to imply that the wavelength of the pressure wave in the cochlea changes slowly with position near the stapes. As a result, waves traveling in either direction through the basal turn undergo little reflection, and the transfer of energy between the middle and inner ears remains efficient at low frequencies. The slow variation of the wavelength implies that the series impedance Z and shunt admittance Y of the cochlear transmission line are approximately proportional at low frequencies and thus requires that the width of the basilar membrane and the cross-sectional areas of the cochlear scalae taper in opposite directions. Maintenance of the symmetry between Z and Y is both necessary and sufficient to ensure that the spatial derivative of the wavelength, and hence the phase of the cochlear input impedance, remains small. Although introduced in another context, the model of Zweig ["Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1229-1254 (1991)] manifests the symmetry between Z and Y. In other transmission-line models of cochlear mechanics, however, that symmetry is absent, and the spatial derivative of the wavelength diverges at low frequencies--the "cochlear catastrophe." Those models therefore contradict the impedance measurements and predict little transfer of energy between the middle and inner ears.

[1]  C. Fernández Dimensions of the Cochlea (Guinea Pig) , 1952 .

[2]  W. Peake,et al.  Acoustic input-admittance of the alligator-lizard ear: Nonlinear features , 1984, Hearing Research.

[3]  V. Nedzelnitsky,et al.  Measurements of Sound Pressure in the Cochleae of Anesthetized Cats , 1974 .

[4]  Anthony W. Gummer,et al.  Direct measurement of basilar membrane stiffness in the guinea pig , 1981 .

[5]  E Zwicker,et al.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  George Esq. Green,et al.  On the Motion of Waves in a variable canal of small depth and width , 1838 .

[7]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Pierce,et al.  The cochlear compromise. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Middle-ear characteristics of anesthetized cats. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B. P. Bogert,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of the Cochlea , 1950 .

[11]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[13]  George Zweig Auditory Speech Preprocessors , 1989, HLT.

[14]  Anthony W. Gummer,et al.  Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique , 1987, Hearing Research.

[15]  Thomas J. Lynch Signal processing by the cat middle ear: admittance and transmission, measurements and models , 1981 .

[16]  G. Zweig,et al.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. D. Miller,et al.  A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Józef Zwislocki-Mościcki,et al.  Theorie der Schneckenmechanik: qualitative und quantitative Analyse , 1948 .

[19]  J B Allen Cochlear models - 1978. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[20]  S. Khanna,et al.  Interferometric measurement of the amplitude and phase of tympanic membrane vibrations in cat , 1989, Hearing Research.

[21]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Input impedance of the cochlea in cat. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  M. Liberman The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  H. Jeffreys On Certain Approximate Solutions of Lineae Differential Equations of the Second Order , 1925 .

[24]  V. Nedzelnitsky,et al.  Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P PIALOUX,et al.  [The external ear]. , 1955, Les Annales d'oto-laryngologie.

[26]  J. Allen,et al.  A parametric study of cochlear input impedance. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G. Wilkinson The Theory of Hearing , 1925, Nature.

[28]  D T Kemp The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[29]  F. Bloch,et al.  Note on the Radiation Field of the electron , 1937 .

[30]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  The Effectiveness of External and Middle Ears in Coupling Acoustic Power into the Cochlea , 1986 .

[31]  M R Schroeder,et al.  An integrable model for the basilar membrane. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  G Zweig,et al.  Reflection of retrograde waves within the cochlea and at the stapes. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  E. de Boer,et al.  Matching impedance of a nonuniform transmission line: application to cochlear modeling. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Longitudinal Stiffness Coupling in a 1-Dimensional Model of the Peripheral Ear , 1986 .

[35]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Measurement of Eardrum Acoustic Impedance , 1986 .

[36]  S. Khanna,et al.  Tympanic membrane vibrations in cats studied by time-averaged holography. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  On Riccati equations describing impedance relations for forward and backward excitation in the one-dimensional cochlea model. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Observations on the Generator Mechanism of Stimulus Frequency Acoustic Emissions — Two Tone Suppression , 1980 .

[39]  An Isolated Sound Emitter in the Cochlea: Notes on Modelling , 1986 .

[40]  Forward and reverse waves in the one-dimensional model of the cochlea , 1986, Hearing Research.

[41]  K. Haller Quantum Electrodynamics , 1979, Nature.

[42]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  S. Neely Finite difference solution of a two-dimensional mathematical model of the cochlea. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  G. Zweig Basilar membrane motion. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[45]  B. Bohne,et al.  Location of structurally similar areas in chinchilla cochleas of different lengths. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  M. Sondhi,et al.  Method for computing motion in a two-dimensional cochlear model. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.