Arthropods as ecological indicators of sustainability in Canadian forests

The high functional and unmatched biological diversity represented by arthropods demand that these organisms be considered as ecological indicators of sustainable forest management. Successful use of arthropods in this capacity will require a systematic and rigorous process, including selection of potential indicators, definition of relationships between indicators and disturbance variables, optimization of the useful range of the indicator and application of the indicator(s) in monitoring. In Canada, the single greatest impediment to the use of arthropods as ecological indicators is the importance of accurate species-level identification and the difficulty achieving it. Consequently, most work has focused on a few relatively well-known groups (e.g., epigaeic carabid and staphylinid beetles and spiders, saproxylic beetles, butterflies and larger night flying moths). Many recent studies have provided baseline data about the range of natural variation and have begun to quantify arthropod responses to natural and anthropogenic disturbances in the context of preplanned experiments or through various retrospective approaches. Carabid beetles are the best-studied group and sufficient sets of data now exist to permit a meta-analysis of the robustness of carabids as indicators across multiple spatial scales and in terms of how well they represent broader ecological responses to disturbances. There is good potential to incorporate arthropod indicators into monitoring programs in Canada, but it is necessary to first complete a scientifically credible selection process for specific ecological indicators. Future research should focus on completing the process for taxa under current study as this develops the best presently understood opportunities for using arthropod indicators in assessing various aspects of environmental change. Researchers should also consider other means of monitoring arthropod biodiversity by the use of surrogate ecological parameters such as ecological land classification and habitat classification systems.

[1]  S. Grove,et al.  Insect biodiversity and dead wood: proceedings of a symposium for the 22 nd International Congress of Entomology , 2006 .

[2]  J. Spence,et al.  Responses of two Sericoda Kirby, 1837 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) species to forest harvesting, wildfire, and burn severity , 2006 .

[3]  Ian Oliver,et al.  Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of Biodiversity , 1996 .

[4]  S. C. Digweed,et al.  Digging out the "digging-in effect" of pitfall traps : Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera : Carabidae) , 1995 .

[5]  E. Wilson.  The Diversity of Life , 1992 .

[6]  D. Langor,et al.  Early colonization of Populus wood by saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) , 2001 .

[7]  C. Buddle,et al.  Succession of boreal forest spider assemblages following wildfire and harvesting , 2000 .

[8]  D. Langor,et al.  Influence of boreal forest succession and dead wood qualities on saproxylic beetles , 2007 .

[9]  V. Behan-Pelletier.  DIVERSITY OF SOIL ARTHROPODS IN CANADA: SYSTEMATIC AND ECOLOGICAL PROBLEMS , 1993 .

[10]  Louis Morneau.  Partial cutting impacts on moths and lepidopteran defoliators in a boreal mixedwood forest of Alberta , 2002 .

[11]  J. Niemelä,et al.  Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species , 1996 .

[12]  T. New.  Introduction to invertebrate conservation biology , 1995 .

[13]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[14]  J. Klimaszewski,et al.  The effects of patch harvesting and site preparation on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in yellow birch dominated forests of southeastern Quebec , 2005 .

[15]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Invertebrates and Boreal Forest Management , 1997 .

[16]  J. Kouki,et al.  Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  J. Martel,et al.  Lepidopteran communities in temperate deciduous forests affected by forest decline , 1997 .

[18]  M. McGeoch.  The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators , 2007 .

[19]  D. Langor,et al.  Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta , 2004 .

[20]  N. Stork,et al.  Forests and Insects , 1997 .

[21]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Effects of Clear-Cut Harvesting on Boreal Ground-Beetle Assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Western Canada , 1993 .

[22]  D. Langor,et al.  Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae) , 2001 .

[23]  J. Niemelä,et al.  SAMPLING CARABID ASSEMBLAGES WITH PITFALL TRAPS: THE MADNESS AND THE METHOD , 1994, The Canadian Entomologist.

[24]  K. Gaston,et al.  Logging and boreal ground-beetle assemblages on two continents: implications for conservation. , 1993 .

[25]  D. Coderre,et al.  Changes in soil macroarthropod communities in relation to forest maturation through three successional stages in the Canadian boreal forest , 1997, Oecologia.

[26]  S. Berch,et al.  Short-term impact of forest soil compaction and organic matter removal on soil mesofauna density and oribatid mite diversity , 2004 .

[27]  C. Buddle,et al.  Arthropod responses to harvesting and wildfire: Implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management , 2006 .

[28]  H. E. J. Hammond.  ARTHROPOD BIODIVERSITY FROM POPULUS COARSE WOODY MATERIAL IN NORTH-CENTRAL ALBERTA: A REVIEW OF TAXA AND COLLECTION METHODS , 1997, The Canadian Entomologist.