Risk Versus Reward, a Financial Analysis of Alternative Contract Specifications for the Miscanthus Lignocellulosic Supply Chain

We evaluate how different contract designs impact risk sharing along the supply chain for the dedicated energy crop miscanthus. We model the full production and transportation system of the miscanthus supply chain because a sustainable supply chain must procure biomass in a cost-effective manner. Using this model, we estimate the financial returns and risks for both a farmer producing miscanthus and the biofuels plant purchasing miscanthus. We evaluate differences among contracts that are designed to address the miscanthus investment cost and the farmers’ opportunity costs. We find that risk can be reduced to both the farmer and the plant by offering a dollar per acre base payment combined with a dollar per ton payment. The farmer faces the lowest risk when the contract combines a dollar per acre and dollar per ton payment. Lastly, we find that indexed contracts designed to reduce annual counter-party risk associated with the risk of farmers opting out of the contract to produce competing crops actually increases overall financial risk to the farmer and plant.

[1]  M. Khanna,et al.  Optimal Contracts to Induce Biomass Production under Risk , 2012 .

[2]  B. English,et al.  Analysis of Contracting Alternatives for Switchgrass as a Production Alternative on an East Tennessee Beef and Crop Farm , 2012 .

[3]  Allan W. Gray,et al.  An Applied Procedure for Estimating and Simulating Multivariate Empirical (MVE) Probability Distributions In Farm-Level Risk Assessment and Policy Analysis , 2000, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[4]  Janet Perry,et al.  Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities , 2004 .

[5]  G. Bocquého,et al.  The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences , 2010 .

[6]  Jeffery R. Williams,et al.  Farmers' Willingness to Grow Switchgrass as a Cellulosic Bioenergy Crop: A Stated Choice Approach , 2011 .

[7]  B. English,et al.  Risk and Return for Bioenergy Crops under Alternative Contracting Arrangements , 2008 .

[8]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[9]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States , 2010 .

[10]  R. Perrin,et al.  Farm-Scale Production Cost of Switchgrass for Biomass , 2008, BioEnergy Research.

[11]  S. Pfeifer A Course In Microeconomic Theory , 2016 .

[12]  K. Foster,et al.  Risk Preferences and Contracting In the U.S. Hog Industry , 1994, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  Steven Y. Wu,et al.  Contract theory and implications for perennial energy crop contracting , 2012 .

[14]  B. Schurle The impact of size on yield variability and crop insurance premiums , 1996 .

[15]  Joseph L. Parcel,et al.  Feeder-pig Producers and Finishers: Who Should Contract? , 1997 .