Determining the Feasibility of Forearm Mounted Vibrotactile Displays

At first glance, multi-element forearm mounted vibrotactile displays would appear to have considerable potential as an output device for mobile computing. The devices are small, robust and discrete, and the body site both easily accessible and socially acceptable for such a purpose. However, due to the absence of a thorough account of vibrotactile perception, it is hard to determine their feasibility, or even what might form an appropriate arrangement of vibrating elements or tactors. We describe two studies intended to shed light on these issues. The first extends the localization literature relating to the forearm, and its results indicate that different spatial arrangements of tactors can result in substantially different levels of performance. The second study examines the influence of adjusting the size of the area of the skin experiencing a vibration with its perceived intensity. The results indicate a positive relationship between increased size and increased perceived intensity. Finally, the implications of these studies for the design of vibrotactile arrays are discussed.

[1]  Lorna M. Brown,et al.  Tactons: Structured Tactile Messages for Non-Visual Information Display , 2004, AUIC.

[2]  R. Cholewiak,et al.  Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: Effects of place and space , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Harm van Essen,et al.  Design and evaluation of Hapticons for enriched Instant Messaging , 2004 .

[4]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building-clearing task , 2005, CHI.

[5]  Ryan M. Traylor,et al.  A Haptic Back Display for Attentional and Directional Cueing , 2003 .

[6]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Tactual displays for wearable computing , 1997, Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[7]  A. A. Collins,et al.  Spatial Factors in Vibrotactile Pattern Perception , 2003 .

[8]  Jongeun Cha,et al.  Immersive Live Sports Experience with Vibrotactile Sensation , 2005, INTERACT.

[9]  Christoph W. Borst,et al.  Bi-level and anti-aliased rendering methods for a low-resolution 2D vibrotactile array , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[10]  Christoph W. Borst,et al.  Haptic Controller Design and Palm-sized Vibrotactile Array , 2004 .

[11]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Vibrotactile waypoint navigation at sea and in the air : two case studies , 2004 .

[12]  J M Loomis,et al.  An investigation of tactile hyperacuity. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[13]  J. Kirman,et al.  Tactile apparent movement: The effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration , 1974 .

[14]  Carter C. Collins,et al.  Tactile Television - Mechanical and Electrical Image Projection , 1970 .

[15]  Randy F. Pausch,et al.  Designing A Successful HMD-Based Experience , 1999, Presence.

[16]  Erin Piateski,et al.  Vibrotactile pattern recognition on the arm and torso , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[17]  Yuichiro Kume,et al.  Vibrotactile letter reading using a low-resolution tactor array , 2004, 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings..

[18]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Perceptual Design of Haptic Icons , 2003 .

[19]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Effect of Contactor Area on the Vibrotactile Threshold , 1963 .

[20]  A. A. Collins,et al.  Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.