An Empirically Derived Taxonomy of Information Technology Structure and Its Relationship to Organizational Structure

This study empirically develops a taxonomy that has implications for matching information technology (IT) and organizational structures. The taxonomy of IT structure is based on the degree of centralization of computer processing, capability to support communications, and the ability to share resources. By using a multistep cluster analysis, both the membership and number of groups are derived from the responses of 313 firms. Four IT structures are identified: centralized (centralized processing, low communication, low sharing), decentralized (decentralized processing, low communication, low sharing), centralized cooperative (centralized processing, high communication, high sharing), and distributed cooperative computing (decentralized processing, high communication, high sharing). Centralized computing is related to functional organizational forms with low integration and centralized decision making. Decentralized computing is related to product organizational forms with decentralized decision making. Centralized cooperative computing is related to functional organizational forms with high integration. Distributed cooperative computing is related to both matrix and product organizational forms with high integration. The ability to identify and understand the implications of IT structure is of critical importance to both academic and management practitioners.

[1]  Richard Leifer,et al.  A Framework for Linking the Structure of Information Systems with Organizational Requirements for Information Sharing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Peter G.W. Keen,et al.  Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology , 1991 .

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[4]  Kirk D. Fiedler,et al.  Business Process Reengineering: Charting a Strategic Path for the Information Age , 1994 .

[5]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[6]  Varun Grover,et al.  Communications architecture: towards a more robust understanding of information flows and emergent patterns of communication in organizations , 1994 .

[7]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[9]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Matching Computer-Based Information Systems with Organizational Structures , 1988, MIS Q..

[10]  Caroline E. Wardle,et al.  The Evolution of Information Systems Architecture , 1984, ICIS.

[11]  P. Rich.  The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design , 1992 .

[12]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Organizational Communication Structure , 1993 .

[13]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Role of Information Technology in Organization Design , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[15]  Kenneth D. Bailey,et al.  Monothetic and Polythetic Typologies and their Relation to Conceptualization, Measurement and Scaling , 1973 .

[16]  Paul Kaestle,et al.  A new rationale for organizational structure , 1990 .

[17]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organization Theory and Design , 1983 .

[18]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[19]  Joey F. George,et al.  Examining the computing and centralization debate , 1991, CACM.

[20]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  A Review Of Monte Carlo Tests Of Cluster Analysis. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[22]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computers, Networks and Work. , 1991 .

[23]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s , 1991, MIS Q..

[24]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[26]  Charles K. Warriner,et al.  Organizations and their environments : essays in the sociology of organizations , 1985 .

[27]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[28]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[29]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information technologies for the 1990s: an organizational impact perspective , 1989, CACM.

[30]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information assets, technology, and organization , 1994 .

[31]  Yannis Bakopoulos,et al.  Toward a More Precise Concept of Information Technology , 2015, ICIS.

[32]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  Information Architecture: In Search of Efficient Flexibility , 1991, MIS Q..

[33]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[34]  Stanley Baiman.  Agency research in managerial accounting: a survey , 1982 .

[35]  O. Williamson.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[36]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Computers, networks, and the corporation , 1991 .

[37]  V. Grover.  An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[38]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[39]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[40]  Louis E. Raho,et al.  Assimilating New Technology into the Organization: An Assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's Model , 1987, MIS Q..