The effect of crown shape on the reflectance of coniferous stands

Abstract The Kuusk–Nilson forest reflectance model was used to study the effect of crown shape on the reflectance of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands. In the first part of the study, we examined spruce and pine stands with an age range of 20–100 years and compared their simulated hemispherical–directional reflectance factors (HDRFs) at nadir in red (661 nm), NIR (838 nm) and MIR (1677 nm) when crowns were modeled as ellipsoids or cones. In all the cases, when a stand was modeled with conical crowns, it had a smaller reflectance factor than the same stand with ellipsoidal crowns. To analyze the sensitivity of HDRF on crown shape, in the second part of the study we simulated the angular distributions of HDRF of two pine stands with different leaf area index (LAI) and canopy closure values at 661 nm assuming four different crown shapes (cone, cylinder, ellipsoid, and cylinder bottom, cone top) and separated the components forming the HDRF. Considerable difference in the HDRF between the four crown shapes was observed: The larger the crown volume, the higher the canopy reflectance at similar LAI and canopy closure. A comparison of the two stands revealed that in denser stands (with a higher canopy closure) single scattering from tree crowns was responsible for the difference in HDRF between the different crown shapes, whereas in stands with a smaller canopy closure the single scattering from ground dominated the HDRF. Finally, the role of crown shape for the retrieval of LAI by inversion from remotely sensed data is discussed.

[1]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  A. Kuusk A two-layer canopy reflectance model , 2001 .

[3]  Pauline Stenberg,et al.  Fertilization has little effect on light-interception efficiency of Picea abies shoots. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[4]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  T. Nilson,et al.  Approximate Analytical Methods for Calculating the Reflection Functions of Leaf Canopies in Remote Sensing Applications , 1991 .

[7]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A Directional Multispectral Forest Reflectance Model , 2000 .

[8]  P. North,et al.  Analyzing the effect of structural variability and canopy gaps on forest BRDF using a geometric-optical model , 1997 .

[9]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[10]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Response of LAI-2000 estimates to changes in plant surface area index in a Scots pine stand. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[11]  A. Kuusk,et al.  Testing directional properties of a forest reflectance model , 2001 .

[12]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimating leaf biochemistry using the PROSPECT leaf optical properties model , 1996 .

[13]  L. Eklundh,et al.  Determination of green phytomass in a northern boreal forest by means of Landsat TM-data and a forest canopy reflectance model , 2000 .

[14]  Hannu Hökkä,et al.  Models for predicting stand development in MELA System , 2002 .

[15]  A. Kuusk The Hot Spot Effect in Plant Canopy Reflectance , 1991 .

[16]  A. Strahler,et al.  A review of reflectance nomenclature used in remote sensing , 2000 .

[17]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Age dependence of forest reflectance: Analysis of main driving factors , 1994 .

[18]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Successional reflectance trajectories in northern temperate forests , 1993 .

[19]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands , 1999 .