Understanding metropolitan patterns of daily encounters

Understanding of the mechanisms driving our daily face-to-face encounters is still limited; the field lacks large-scale datasets describing both individual behaviors and their collective interactions. However, here, with the help of travel smart card data, we uncover such encounter mechanisms and structures by constructing a time-resolved in-vehicle social encounter network on public buses in a city (about 5 million residents). Using a population scale dataset, we find physical encounters display reproducible temporal patterns, indicating that repeated encounters are regular and identical. On an individual scale, we find that collective regularities dominate distinct encounters’ bounded nature. An individual’s encounter capability is rooted in his/her daily behavioral regularity, explaining the emergence of “familiar strangers” in daily life. Strikingly, we find individuals with repeated encounters are not grouped into small communities, but become strongly connected over time, resulting in a large, but imperceptible, small-world contact network or “structure of co-presence” across the whole metropolitan area. Revealing the encounter pattern and identifying this large-scale contact network are crucial to understanding the dynamics in patterns of social acquaintances, collective human behaviors, and—particularly—disclosing the impact of human behavior on various diffusion/spreading processes.

[1]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Petter Holme,et al.  Simulated Epidemics in an Empirical Spatiotemporal Network of 50,185 Sexual Contacts , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  S. Volo,et al.  Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: Spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel , 2011 .

[4]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Activity driven modeling of time varying networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Effects of time window size and placement on the structure of an aggregated communication network , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[8]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[9]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[10]  Jean-Pierre Eckmann,et al.  Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Eric Paulos,et al.  The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships , 2005, CHI.

[14]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[16]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Limits of Predictability in Human Mobility , 2010, Science.

[18]  A. King,et al.  Contact Network Structure Explains the Changing Epidemiology of Pertussis , 2010, Science.

[19]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Reconstructing the 2003/2004 H3N2 influenza epidemic in Switzerland with a spatially explicit, individual-based model , 2011, BMC infectious diseases.

[20]  Rick Grannis From the Ground Up: Translating Geography into Community through Neighbor Networks , 2009 .

[21]  Eduard Heindl,et al.  Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses , 2012 .

[22]  M. Newman,et al.  Applying Network Theory to Epidemics: Control Measures for Mycoplasma pneumoniae Outbreaks , 2003, Emerging infectious diseases.

[23]  A. Barrat,et al.  Simulation of an SEIR infectious disease model on the dynamic contact network of conference attendees , 2011, BMC medicine.

[24]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review , 2011 .

[25]  A. Vespignani Predicting the Behavior of Techno-Social Systems , 2009, Science.

[26]  Maria A. Kazandjieva,et al.  A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Daylength Across Diverse Cultures , 2011 .

[30]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Rick Grannis The Importance of Trivial Streets: Residential Streets and Residential Segregation1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Mathematical Approach to the Spread of Scientific Ideas—the History of Mast Cell Research , 1966, Nature.

[34]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Anne-Marie d'Hauteserre Urban Rythms and Travel Behaviour: Spatial and Temporal Phenomena of Daily Travel , 2011 .

[36]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Dynamic social networks and the implications for the spread of infectious disease , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.