Which is more counterproductive: a brief delay or 'start anyway'?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Habbema,et al. Predicting poor ovarian response in IVF: use of repeat basal FSH measurement. , 2004, The Journal of reproductive medicine.
[2] N. Bracero,et al. Fine tuning cycle day 3 hormonal assessment of ovarian reserve improves in vitro fertilization outcome in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.
[3] P. Sluss,et al. Endocrine assessment of relative reproductive age in normal eumenorrheic younger and older women across multiple cycles. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[4] S. Daneshmand,et al. Infertile women of advanced reproductive age. Variability of day 3 FSH and E2 levels. , 1998, The Journal of reproductive medicine.
[5] T. Gürgan,et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 to predict ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization using a flare-up protocol. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.
[6] J. Nisker,et al. Future in vitro fertilization pregnancy potential of women with variably elevated day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.
[7] Z. Rosenwaks,et al. Variability of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels in eumenorrheic women. , 1995, The Journal of reproductive medicine.
[8] H. Abdalla,et al. Repeated testing of basal FSH levels has no predictive value for IVF outcome in women with elevated basal FSH. , 2006, Human reproduction.