A uterine electromyographic activity as a measure of labour progression

Background:The purpose of this study was the possibility to follow the progress of labour using electromyographic (EMG) signals obtained from the uterine corpus and the cervix. Methods: 28 healty primiparous women with induced labour at an age from 19 to 29 years were enrolled in the study. For interpretation of EMG signals Sample entropy (SampEn), the measure of time series regularity was used. SampEn values were related to the progress of labour recorded in the partogram. h e main outcome is association between labour progress and values of SampEn. Results: Approaching the childbirth during normally progressing labour, regular activity of uterine corpus muscles and cervical muscles is indicated as a decreasing trend in values of SampEn. A delay in the active phase of labour due to active contractions of cervical circular muscles is indicated in greater values of SampEn calculated from cervical EMG activity. Conclusions: By measuring and processing of EMG signals from the uterine corpus and the cervix an obstetrician can obtain an additional useful information on the progress of labour.

[1]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Interpretation of approximate entropy: analysis of intracranial pressure approximate entropy during acute intracranial hypertension , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M Khalil,et al.  An unsupervised classification method of uterine electromyography signals: Classification for detection of preterm deliveries , 2009, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[3]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Activity of smooth muscles in human cervix and uterus. , 1998, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[4]  N Radhakrishnan,et al.  Estimating regularity in epileptic seizure time-series data. A complexity-measure approach. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[5]  O. Barnea,et al.  Effects of the individual uterine contraction on fetal head descent and cervical dilatation during the active stage of labor. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  L. Leeman,et al.  Dystocia in nulliparous women. , 2007, American family physician.

[7]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity of the Contraction Segments in Uterine Electromyography , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[8]  G. Pardi,et al.  Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized trial. , 2008, European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology.

[9]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Electromyographic activity in cervices with very low Bishop score during labor , 1995, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  J. Wiener,et al.  A Second‐Stage Partogram , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  O. Barnea,et al.  The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[12]  K C Lun,et al.  Characteristics of uterine activity in nulliparous labour , 1984, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  I. Rezek,et al.  Stochastic complexity measures for physiological signal analysis , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  M. Pajntar,et al.  Active contractions of the cervix in the latent phase of labour , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  M. Mischi,et al.  Nifedipine-Induced Changes in the Electrohysterogram of Preterm Contractions: Feasibility in Clinical Practice , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology international.

[16]  G. Fele-Zorz,et al.  A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  M. P. Griffin,et al.  Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[18]  Mahmoud Hassan,et al.  Interactions between Uterine EMG at Different Sites Investigated Using Wavelet Analysis: Comparison of Pregnancy and Labor Contractions , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[19]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  M. Dombrowski,et al.  Preterm Prediction Study: Comparison of the Cervical Score and Bishop Score for Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  M. Hnat,et al.  Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. , 2007, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[23]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Uterine electrical activity as predictor of preterm birth in women with preterm contractions. , 2001, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[24]  M. Pajntar.  The smooth muscles of the cervix in labour. , 1994, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[25]  S. Wray,et al.  Obstructed labour. , 2003, British medical bulletin.

[26]  Ofer Barnea,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation and fetal head station during labor. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  R. H. Philpott.  Obstructed labour. , 1980, Clinics in obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  C. Marque,et al.  Abdominal EHG on a 4 by 4 grid: mapping and presenting the propagation of uterine contractions , 2007 .

[29]  E. Hon,et al.  Quantitation of uterine activity in 100 primiparous patients. , 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  S. Kilpatrick,et al.  Characteristics of Normal Labor , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  Holger Maul,et al.  The physiology of uterine contractions. , 2003, Clinics of Perinatology.

[32]  L. Albers,et al.  The Length of Active Labor in Normal Pregnancies , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  L. Marpeau,et al.  The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[34]  Evaluating the progress of the labour with sample e ntropy calculated from the uterine EMG activity , 2009 .

[35]  Marta Borowska,et al.  Uterine Contractility , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Terrien Jeremy,et al.  Sources of Bias in Synchronization Measures and how to Minimize Their Effects on the Estimation of Synchronicity: Application to the Uterine Electromyogram , 2009 .

[37]  D. Basu,et al.  Role of a second stage partogram in predicting the outcome of normal labour , 2009, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[38]  E. Hodnett,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a bedside partogram in the active management of primiparous labour. , 2007, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[39]  Muriel Doret,et al.  Uterine Electromyography Characteristics for Early Diagnosis of Mifepristone-Induced Preterm Labor , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  K. Oláh.  Changes in cervical electromyographic activity and their correlation with the cervical response to myometrial activity during labour. , 1994, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[41]  D. Abásolo,et al.  Entropy analysis of the EEG background activity in Alzheimer's disease patients , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[42]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  Kenneth T. V. Grattan,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic tools for characterizing abdominal electromyographic signals before and during labour , 2000 .

[44]  Catherine Marque,et al.  Ridge Extraction From the Time–frequency Representation (TFR) of Signals Based on an Image Processing Approach: Application to the Analysis of Uterine Electromyogram AR TFR , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  William L. Maner,et al.  Identification of Human Term and Preterm Labor using Artificial Neural Networks on Uterine Electromyography Data , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  Erik W. Jensen,et al.  EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[47]  Mark D. Skowronski,et al.  Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography , 2006, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[48]  C. Marque,et al.  Use of the electrohysterogram signal for characterization of contractions during pregnancy , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[50]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine Electromyography and Light-Induced Fluorescence in the Management of Term and Preterm Labor , 2002, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[51]  K. Joseph,et al.  Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  E H BISHOP,et al.  Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction , 1964, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[53]  Brynjar Karlsson,et al.  Uterine electromyogram database and processing function interface: An open standard analysis platform for electrohysterogram signals , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[54]  Holger Maul,et al.  Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[55]  I. Verdenik,et al.  Contribution of cervical smooth muscle activity to the duration of latent and active phases of labour , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[56]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[57]  R. Schwarz,et al.  The Uterus , 1991, Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[58]  H. Schwalm,et al.  The structure of the musculature of the human uterus--muscles and connective tissue. , 1966, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[59]  Dorothee E. Marossero,et al.  Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[60]  B. Ottesen,et al.  Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[61]  J. Jezewski,et al.  Quantitative analysis of contraction patterns in electrical activity signal of pregnant uterus as an alternative to mechanical approach , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[62]  S. Guzzetti,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy , 2000 .

[63]  W. Maner,et al.  Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. , 2007, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.