Impact flux on Jupiter: From superbolides to large-scale collisions

Context. Regular observations of Jupiter by a large number of amateur astronomers have resulted in the serendipitous discovery of short bright flashes in its atmosphere, which have been proposed as being caused by impacts of small objects. Three flashes were detected: one on June 3, 2010, one on August 20, 2010, and one on September 10, 2012. Aims. We show that the flashes are caused by impacting objects that we characterize in terms of their size, and we study the flux of small impacts on Jupiter. Methods. We measured the light curves of these atmospheric airbursts to extract their luminous energy and computed the masses and sizes of the objects. We ran simulations of impacts and compared them with the light curves. We analyzed the statistical significance of these events in the large pool of Jupiter observations. Results. All three objects are in the 5−20 m size category depending on their density, and they released energy comparable to the recent Chelyabinsk airburst. Model simulations approximately agree with the interpretation of the limited observations. Biases in observations of Jupiter suggest a rate of 12−60 similar impacts per year and we provide software tools for amateurs to examine the faint signature of impacts in their data to increase the number of detected collisions. Conclusions. The impact rate agrees with dynamical models of comets. More massive objects (a few 100 m) should impact with Jupiter every few years leaving atmospheric dark debris features that could be detectable about once per decade.

[1]  D. Crawford The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter: Models of fragment penetration and fireball evolution , 1996 .

[2]  H. Hammel,et al.  Keck adaptive optics images of Jupiter’s north polar cap and Northern Red Oval , 2011 .

[3]  J. Horner,et al.  Jupiter – friend or foe? II: the Centaurs , 2008, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[4]  Michael H. Wong,et al.  JUPITER AFTER THE 2009 IMPACT: HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE IMAGING OF THE IMPACT-GENERATED DEBRIS AND ITS TEMPORAL EVOLUTION , 2010 .

[5]  Miguel de Val-Borro,et al.  Spatial distribution of water in the stratosphere of Jupiter from Herschel HIFI and PACS observations , 2013 .

[6]  S. P. Worden,et al.  The flux of small near-Earth objects colliding with the Earth , 2002, Nature.

[7]  J. Ortiz,et al.  Detection of sporadic impact flashes on the Moon : Implications for the luminous efficiency of hypervelocity impacts and derived terrestrial impact rates , 2006 .

[8]  T. Duxbury,et al.  A fireball in Jupiter's atmosphere , 1981 .

[9]  G. Orton,et al.  The temporal evolution of the July 2009 Jupiter impact cloud , 2013 .

[10]  G. Orton,et al.  Vertical cloud structure of the 2009 Jupiter impact based on HST/WFC3 observations , 2012 .

[11]  David A. Crawford,et al.  Comet Shoemaker‐Levy 9 Fragment Size Estimates: How Big Was the Parent Body? a , 1995 .

[12]  Kevin Zahnle,et al.  Cratering Rates in the Outer Solar System , 1999 .

[13]  D. Ming,et al.  Pancam Multispectral Imaging Results from the Spirit Rover at Gusev Crater , 2004, Science.

[14]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[15]  J. Harrington,et al.  PLUME DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHOEMAKER–LEVY 9 COMET IMPACT , 2011, 1102.3117.

[16]  T. Trucano,et al.  Numerical modeling of Shoemaker‐Levy 9 impacts as a framework for interpreting observations , 1995 .

[17]  G. Orton,et al.  A multi-wavelength study of the 2009 impact on Jupiter: Comparison of high resolution images from Gemini, Keck and HST , 2010 .

[18]  T. Slanger,et al.  New perspectives on the Venus nightglow , 1993 .

[19]  G. Wetherill Possible consequences of absence of “jupiters” in planetary systems , 1994, Astrophysics and space science.

[20]  D. Trilling,et al.  Long-term evolution of the aerosol debris cloud produced by the 2009 impact on Jupiter , 2011 .

[21]  K. Baines,et al.  Absolute Reflectivity Spectra of Jupiter: 0.25–3.5 Micrometers , 1996 .

[22]  Richard C. Puetter,et al.  THE IMPACT OF A LARGE OBJECT ON JUPITER IN 2009 JULY , 2010, 1005.2312.

[23]  Nicolas Thomas,et al.  Distribution of Mid-Latitude Ground Ice on Mars from New Impact Craters , 2009, Science.

[24]  Observations of Ejecta Clouds Produced by Impacts onto Saturn’s Rings , 2013, Science.

[25]  Michael H. Wong,et al.  The atmospheric influence, size and possible asteroidal nature of the July 2009 Jupiter impactor , 2011 .

[26]  Kenneth S Edgett,et al.  Present-Day Impact Cratering Rate and Contemporary Gully Activity on Mars , 2006, Science.

[27]  I. Pater,et al.  Jupiter’s stratospheric hydrocarbons and temperatures after the July 2009 impact from VLT infrared spectroscopy , 2010 .

[28]  T. Dowling,et al.  HST imaging of atmospheric phenomena created by the impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 , 1995, Science.

[29]  Z. Charvát,et al.  Meteosat observation of the atmospheric entry of 2008 TC3 over Sudan and the associated dust cloud , 2009 .

[30]  H. Melosh Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process , 1986 .

[31]  G. Orton,et al.  The aftermath of the July 2009 impact on Jupiter: Ammonia, temperatures and particulates from Gemini thermal infrared spectroscopy , 2011 .

[32]  Jupiter – friend or foe? IV: the influence of orbital eccentricity and inclination , 2011, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[33]  S. N. Milam,et al.  The impact and recovery of asteroid 2008 TC3 , 2009, Nature.

[34]  E. Karkoschka Methane, Ammonia, and Temperature Measurements of the Jovian Planets and Titan from CCD–Spectrophotometry , 1998 .

[35]  M. L. Norman,et al.  Simulating Radiating and Magnetized Flows in Multiple Dimensions with ZEUS-MP , 2005, astro-ph/0511545.

[36]  Mark T. Lemmon,et al.  Extraterrestrial meteors: A martian meteor and its parent comet , 2005, Nature.

[37]  B. Jones,et al.  Jupiter – friend or foe? I: The asteroids , 2008, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[38]  P. Nicholson The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter: Earth-based observations of impact phenomena , 1996 .

[39]  Ricardo Hueso,et al.  The international outer planets watch atmospheres node database of giant-planet images , 2010 .

[40]  J. Ortiz,et al.  Optical detection of meteoroidal impacts on the Moon , 2000, Nature.

[41]  MODELS OF THE SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9 IMPACTS. II. RADIATIVE-HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING OF THE PLUME SPLASHBACK , 2001, astro-ph/0105039.

[42]  M. Holman,et al.  Planetary Impact Rates from Ecliptic Comets , 2000 .

[43]  Timothy Edward Dowling,et al.  Jupiter : the planet, satellites, and magnetosphere , 2004 .

[44]  Alfred S. McEwen,et al.  The current martian cratering rate , 2010 .

[45]  Mark B. Boslough,et al.  Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat. , 2007 .

[46]  R. Hueso,et al.  First Earth-based Detection of a Superbolide on Jupiter , 2010 .

[47]  J. Chambers,et al.  Jupiter – friend or foe? III: the Oort cloud comets , 2009, International Journal of Astrobiology.