Information processing interpretation of errors in college science learning

This article begins with a brief summary of mental models from the information processing perspective. A model of prototypical college learning is then presented. Next, some of the links between mental models and cognitive errors are examined. Finally, studies of one category of cognitive errors, misconceptions and preconceptions of college science students are reviewed. Six factors contributing to error production are identified: four involve spontaneous cognitive mechanisms (strong word associations; non-verbal, intuitive knowledge; tendency to minimize mental effort; untimely triggering of natural language processing mechanisms) and two involve imperfect knowledge (alternative belief systems; fuzzy concepts).

[1]  R. Sperry,et al.  Some effects of disconnecting the cerebral hemispheres. , 1982, Science.

[2]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects , 1983 .

[3]  Bert F. Green,et al.  The Relation of Knowledge to Problem Solving, with Examples from Kinematics. , 1982 .

[4]  M. Just,et al.  Eye fixations and cognitive processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. Jensen,et al.  Chronometric analysis of intelligence , 1980 .

[6]  G. Kelly.  A theory of personality : the psychology of personal constructs , 1963 .

[7]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[8]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  John J. Clement,et al.  Translation Difficulties in Learning Mathematics , 1981 .

[10]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[12]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Toward Wider Public Understanding of Science , 1973 .

[14]  Jane A. Stallings,et al.  Factors Influencing Women's Decisions to Enroll in Advanced Mathematics Courses. Final Report. , 1979 .

[15]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse Comprehension and Sources of Individual Differences. , 1977 .

[16]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  A. Jensen,et al.  Reaction time, evoked brain potentials, and psychometric g in the severely retarded , 1981 .

[18]  B. Shanon.  Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the Physics of the Layman , 1976, Perception.

[19]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[20]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[21]  W. A. Wickelgren.  Human Learning and Memory , 1981 .

[22]  J. Inglis,et al.  Sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence. , 1981, Science.

[23]  L. Resnick,et al.  Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception , 1983, Science.

[24]  K. Alexander,et al.  Sex Differences in Quantitative SAT Performance: New Evidence on the Differential Coursework Hypothesis , 1983 .

[25]  G. Johansson.  Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[26]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[27]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[28]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A Psychologist Views Human Processing: Human Errors and Other Phenomena Suggest Processing Mechanisms , 1981, IJCAI.

[29]  J. Carlson,et al.  Reaction Time, Movement Time, and Intelligence: A Replication and Extension. , 1982 .

[30]  Kathleen M. Fisher,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative differences in learning associated with multiple‐choice testing , 1981 .

[31]  J. Inglis,et al.  Sex Differences in the Cognitive Effects of Unilateral Brain Damage , 1982, Cortex.

[32]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[33]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Emotional Mood as a Context for Learning and Recall. , 1978 .

[34]  Audrey B. Champagne.  Interactions of Students' Knowledge With Their Comprehension and Design of Science Experiments. , 1980 .

[35]  J. Lochhead,et al.  Student conceptions of simple circuits , 1980 .

[36]  Earl Hunt,et al.  On the nature of intelligence. , 1983, Science.

[37]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[38]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Some observations on mental models , 1987 .

[39]  J. Inglis,et al.  A meta-analysis of sex differences in the effects of unilateral brain damage on intelligence test results. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[40]  John J. Clement,et al.  Learning Without Understanding: The Effects of Tutoring Strategies on Algebra Misconceptions , 1980 .

[41]  J. Larkin,et al.  Understanding and Teaching Problem‐Solving in Physics , 1979 .

[42]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning : The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities , 1977 .

[43]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics , 1980 .

[44]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. Working Paper ES-19. , 1984 .

[45]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[46]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Cognition: An Introduction , 1973 .

[47]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[48]  A. Schoenfeld.  Beyond the Purely Cognitive: Metacognition and Social Cognition as Driving Forces in Intellectual Performance. , 1982 .

[49]  L. Hudson.  Frames of Mind , 1970 .

[50]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[51]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon , 1966 .

[52]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[53]  J. Minstrell.  Explaining the ’’at rest’’ condition of an object , 1982 .

[54]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[55]  Mikhail V. Matz,et al.  Towards a computational theory of algebraic competence , 1980 .

[56]  Peter Rosnick,et al.  Some Misconceptions concerning the Concept of Variable. , 1981 .

[57]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Learning Strategies. , 1978 .

[58]  C. Lawson.  Brain mechanisms and human learning , 1967 .

[59]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[61]  Hendrik Radatz,et al.  Students' Errors in the Mathematical Learning Process: a Survey* , 1980 .

[62]  K. Pribram,et al.  Chapter III – The Neuropsychology of Attention: Emotional and Motivational Controls , 1980 .

[63]  J. Beckwith.  Gender and Math Performance: Does Biology Have Implications for Educational Policy? , 1983 .

[64]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  A new measure of intelligence? , 1981, Nature.

[65]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[66]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Steps toward a cognitive engineering: Design rules based on analyses of human error , 1982, CHI '82.

[67]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[68]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  What goes on in the mind of the learner , 1980 .

[69]  J. Piaget.  Child's Conception of Movement and Speed , 1970 .