Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care.

PURPOSE Electronic health records are expected to improve the quality of care provided to hospitalized patients. For nurses, use of electronic documentation sources becomes highly relevant because this is where they obtain the majority of necessary patient information. METHODS An integrative review of the literature examined the relationship between electronic nursing documentation and the quality of care provided to hospitalized patients. Donabedian's quality framework was used to organize empirical literature for review. RESULTS To date, the use of electronic nursing documentation to improve patient outcomes remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Future research should investigate the day-to-day interactions between nurses and electronic nursing documentation for the provision of quality care to hospitalized patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The majority of U.S. hospital care units currently use paper-based nursing documentation to exchange patient information for quality care. However, by 2014, all U.S. hospitals are expected to use electronic nursing documentation on patient care units, with the anticipated benefit of improved quality. However, the extent to which electronic nursing documentation improves the quality of care to hospitalized patients remains unknown, in part due to the lack of effective comparisons with paper-based nursing documentation.

[1]  I. Thorell-Ekstrand,et al.  Prerequisites and consequences of nursing documentation in patient records as perceived by a group of Registered Nurses. , 2003, Journal of clinical nursing.

[2]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Bedside vital signs capture for the non-ICU setting-an open source, PC-based solution , 2001, AMIA.

[3]  Kathy Smith,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Computerized Clinical Documentation , 2005, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[4]  S Corcoran-Perry,et al.  Supplemental-information-seeking behavior of cardiovascular nurses. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[5]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Electronic patient record use during ward rounds: a qualitative study of interaction between medical staff , 2008, Critical care.

[6]  Richard I. Cook,et al.  Creating Resilient IT: How the Sign-Out Sheet Shows Clinicians Make Healthcare Work , 2006, AMIA.

[7]  S. Davidson,et al.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. , 2004, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  Philip Darbyshire,et al.  'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information. , 2004, Journal of clinical nursing.

[9]  S. Kossman,et al.  Nurses' Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on Work and Patient Outcomes , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[10]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Research Paper: Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-year Study , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Selmer Bringsjord,et al.  Rage against the machine , 2012 .

[12]  L. Aiken,et al.  Studying outcomes of organizational change in health services. , 1997, Medical care.

[13]  A. Minnick,et al.  The impact of computerized documentation on nurses' use of time. , 1996, Computers in nursing.

[14]  K. Saarinen,et al.  Does the implementation of a clinical information system decrease the time intensive care nurses spend on documentation of care? , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Prioritizing strategies for preventing medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[16]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P M Schwirian,et al.  Computers in nursing practice. A comparison of the attitudes of nurses and nursing students. , 1989, Computers in nursing.

[18]  Ting-Ting Lee,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system. , 2006, Journal of clinical nursing.

[19]  K. Kirchhoff,et al.  RN Attitudes Toward Computers , 1989, Nursing management.

[20]  A. Donabedian The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment , 1980 .

[21]  R. Alfaro-LeFevre Critical thinking and clinical judgment , 2013 .

[22]  Jane Robles The Effect of the Electronic Medical Record on Nurses’ Work , 2009, Creative Nursing.

[23]  Donna J. Burnie Electronic health records documentation in nursing : nurses' perceptions, attitudes and preferences , 2010 .

[24]  E. Siegler,et al.  Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records. , 2009, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  Carolyn E Aydin,et al.  Nursing Documentation Time During Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record , 2003, The Journal of nursing administration.

[26]  C A Murphy,et al.  Pretest and post-test attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system. , 1994, Computers in nursing.

[27]  M. Getty,et al.  A comparative study of the attitudes of users and non-users towards computerized care planning. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[28]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study , 1998, BMJ.

[29]  S. Compton,et al.  Nursing research. Principles and methods: 7th edition , 2005 .

[30]  L. Moody,et al.  Electronic Health Records Documentation in Nursing , 2004 .

[31]  S. Timmons Nurses resisting information technology. , 2003, Nursing inquiry.

[32]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Attitudes of nurses toward computerization: a replication. , 1992, Computers in nursing.

[33]  Shirley Moore Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet , 1989 .

[34]  J. Douglas,et al.  Nursing Informatics , 1983, Health Informatics.

[35]  C Bongartz Computer-oriented patient care. A comparison of nurses' attitudes and perceptions. , 1988, Computers in nursing.

[36]  Brian Hakes,et al.  Assessing the Impact of an Electronic Medical Record on Nurse Documentation Time , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[37]  S. Shortell,et al.  Crossing the quality chasm: implications for health services administration education. , 2004, The Journal of health administration education.

[38]  A. Brodt,et al.  Nurses' attitudes towards computerization in a Midwestern community hospital. , 1986, Computers in nursing.

[39]  P. Asaro,et al.  Effects of computerized provider order entry and nursing documentation on workflow. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[40]  Habib Alquraini,et al.  Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[41]  R. Tapp Inhibitors and Facilitators to Documentation of Nursing Practice , 1990, Western journal of nursing research.

[42]  Denise Polit-O'Hara,et al.  Nursing Research: Principles and Methods , 1978 .

[43]  Christine Goeschel Crossing the quality chasm: who will lead? , 2002, Michigan health & hospitals.

[44]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Effects of a Computer-based Nursing Documentation System on the Quality of Nursing Documentation , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.