Persuasive Decision Support: Improving Reliance on Decision Aids

The primary role of a decision aid is to guide and support a decision maker. As reliance on a decision aid is largely discretionary the persuasiveness of the system becomes critically important. In this paper characteristics thought to affect systems persuasiveness are examined. This paper asserts that the target and source of a decision support message, along with the design of the message itself, act to influence the persuasiveness of the decision support provided. Using a purpose built experimental platform with seventy subjects the research finds that the persuasiveness of a decision support message is varied by the perceived difficulty of the task being undertaken, and the perceived usefulness of the decision support provided. The type of decisional guidance provided also affects persuasiveness of the system; in particular, providing suggestive decisional guidance is shown to significantly improve system persuasiveness. The implications of these findings relate to the appropriate design of decision aids, and the contexts within which a decision aid can be expected to persuade decision makers to reply on the support provided.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Pervasive persuasive technology and environmental sustainability , 2008 .

[3]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[4]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[5]  C. I. Hovland The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[6]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  Decisional guidance and end-user display choices , 1999 .

[7]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  Explanation provision and use in an intelligent decision aid , 2004, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[8]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  Side effects of decision guidance in decision support systems , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[10]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  A. A. Lumsdaine Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Clark Hampton,et al.  Determinants of reliance: An empirical test of the theory of technology dominance , 2005, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Nicole Clark,et al.  A generalized model of decision‐making processes for companies in financial distress , 1999 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use of Information in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids , 1992, MIS Q..

[17]  Gary Klein,et al.  Persuasive expert systems: the influence of confidence and discrepancy , 2000 .

[18]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decisional Guidance for Computer-Based Decision Support , 1991, MIS Q..

[19]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Influence of Decision Aids on Choice Strategies: An Experimental Analysis of the Role of Cognitive Effort , 1994 .

[20]  Feng Wang,et al.  On the effectiveness of decisional guidance , 1996, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Lois S. Mahoney,et al.  An investigation of the effects of decisional guidance and cognitive ability on decision-making involving uncertainty data , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[22]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[23]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Descriptive Analysis for Computer-Based Decision Support: Special Focus Article , 1988, Oper. Res..

[24]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Discovering Potential and Realizing Value from Information Technology Investments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[26]  Valeria Carofiglio,et al.  Portia: A User-Adapted Persuasion System in the Healthy-Eating Domain , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[27]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[28]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[29]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  Impact of intelligent decision aids on expert and novice decision-makers' judgments , 2004 .

[30]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[31]  Nicole Clark,et al.  A validated expert system for decision making in corporate recovery , 1999, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[32]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Task Contingent Model of Work-Unit Structure. , 1974 .

[33]  Bijan Fazlollahi,et al.  The Effectiveness of Decisional Guidance: An Empirical Evaluation , 2001, Decis. Sci..