Most liked, fewest friends: patterns of enterprise social media use

Enterprise social media can provide visibility of users' actions and thus has the potential to reveal insights about users in the organization. We mined large-scale social media use in an enterprise to examine: a) user roles with such broad platforms and b) whether people with large social networks are highly regarded. First, a factor analysis revealed that most variance of social media usage is explained by commenting and 'liking' behaviors while other usage can be characterized as patterns of distinct tool usage. These results informed the development of a model showing that online network size interacts with other media usage to predict who is highly assessed in the organization. We discovered that the smaller one's online social network size in the organization, the more highly assessed they were by colleagues. We explain this inverse relationship as due to friending behavior being highly visible but not yet valued in the organization.

[1]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Social tagging roles: publishers, evangelists, leaders , 2008, CHI.

[3]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[4]  J Raftery,et al.  Opportunity cost , 1999, BMJ.

[5]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  K. Arrow,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2020 .

[7]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  Communication Yearbook 36 , 2012 .

[8]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[9]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[10]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association , 2013 .

[11]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization , 2009, C&T.

[12]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[14]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[15]  Aino Kianto,et al.  Applying wikis to managing knowledge—A socio-technical approach , 2009 .

[16]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media , 2009, GROUP.

[19]  D. Boyd.  Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications , 2010 .

[20]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Academy of management journal , 2011 .

[21]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  Understanding affect in the workplace via social media , 2013, CSCW.

[22]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[23]  Ido Guy,et al.  The perception of others: inferring reputation from social media in the enterprise , 2014, CSCW.

[24]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[25]  Ido Guy,et al.  Do you want to know?: recommending strangers in the enterprise , 2011, CSCW.

[26]  Ido Guy,et al.  Digital Traces of Interest: Deriving Interest Relationships from Social Media Interactions , 2011, ECSCW.

[27]  Russ Kahan,et al.  Opportunity costs , 1998 .

[28]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[29]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Ge Gao,et al.  Closure vs. structural holes: how social network information and culture affect choice of collaborators , 2013, CSCW.

[31]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  Harvesting with SONAR: the value of aggregating social network information , 2008, CHI.

[32]  David Carmel,et al.  Mining expertise and interests from social media , 2013, WWW.

[33]  Ajita John,et al.  Collaborative Tagging and Expertise in the Enterprise , 2006 .

[34]  Zizi Papacharissi.  A Networked Self : Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites , 2010 .

[35]  A. Basilevsky,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[36]  Anna Wu,et al.  Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site , 2010, CHI.

[37]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[38]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Werner Geyer,et al.  People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  James A. Danowski,et al.  The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  J. DiMicco,et al.  People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site , 2009 .