Effects of angle of approach on cursor movement with a mouse: Consideration of Fitt's law

Research related to various aspects of human-computer interactions has become increasingly important to the design and implementation of effective interface systems and input devices. As the man-machine interface has become more direct, the analysis and application of models to account for this interaction have received increasing attention by investigators. In that regard, the speed and accuracy of human motor movements associated with computer input devices have often been modeled by Fitts' law. Most such analyses, however, have not considered the angle of approach as a factor. The present study investigated the interactive effects on movement time of the angle of approach, the size of the target, and the distance to the target for the use of a mouse to select icon-like targets presented on a computer's display screen. Angle of approach, target size, and target distance significantly affected movement time. Although the global R2 based on a Fitts' law linear model was low in comparison with other studies, an analysis of the residuals showed that the linear model's effectiveness in prediction interacted with the other variables under investigation.

[1]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices , 1991, TOIS.

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons with a Mouse , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[3]  John Karat,et al.  A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  E. R. F. W. Grossman,et al.  The Information-Capacity of the Human Motor-System in Pursuit Tracking , 1960 .

[5]  J. Voelcker,et al.  Of mice and menus: designing the user-friendly interface , 1989, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Effect of varying target height in a Fitts' movement task , 1994 .

[7]  G F Wilson,et al.  Air-to-ground training missions: a psychophysiological workload analysis. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[8]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[9]  Brian W. Epps Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[10]  Sol Sherr,et al.  Input Devices , 1990 .

[11]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  MICELAB: Spatial processing of mouse movement in Turbo Pascal , 1995 .

[12]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .

[13]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Iconic interfacing: The role of icon distinctiveness and fixed or variable screen locations , 1990, INTERACT.

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Selection devices for user of an electronic encyclopedia: An empirical comparison of four possibilities , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Effect of target shape on movement time in a Fitts task. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[16]  S. Mackenzie,et al.  A comparison of input device in elemental pointing and dragging task , 1991, CHI 1991.

[17]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[18]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[19]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[21]  S M Luria,et al.  Performance and preference with various VDT phosphors. , 1989, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Tom Jones,et al.  An Empirical Study of Children's Use of Computer Pointing Devices , 1991 .

[23]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[24]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[25]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  How should Fitts' Law be applied to human-computer interaction? , 1992 .

[27]  Douglas C. Engelbart,et al.  Display-Selection Techniques for Text Manipulation , 1967 .