Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James Wilsdon. The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management , 2016 .
[2] Diana Hicks,et al. The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.
[3] Gustavo Lannelongue,et al. Scholarly Impact Revisited , 2012 .
[4] Péter Jacsó,et al. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Scopus , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..
[5] Mike Thelwall,et al. Scholarly Use of the Web: What Are the Key Inducers of Links to Journal Web Sites , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[6] Mike Thelwall,et al. Substance without citation: evaluating the online impact of grey literature , 2014, Scientometrics.
[7] Michael H. MacRoberts,et al. Problems of citation analysis , 1992, Scientometrics.
[8] R. Kling,et al. Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing , 1999 .
[9] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..
[10] Peder Olesen Larsen,et al. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.
[11] Monika Henzinger,et al. The stability of the h-index , 2009, Scientometrics.
[12] R. Whitley. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .
[13] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[14] Michael H. MacRoberts,et al. Problems of citation analysis , 1996, Scientometrics.
[15] Nisa Bakkalbasi,et al. An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment , 2005, D Lib Mag..
[16] Vincent Larivière,et al. Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[17] Mike Thelwall,et al. Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles , 2006, Scientometrics.
[18] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The calculation of web impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.
[19] Tobias Siebenlist,et al. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage , 2011, J. Informetrics.
[20] José Luis Ortega,et al. Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google scholar citations , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[21] Yvonne Rogers,et al. Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Twelve years of Wikipedia research , 2014, WebSci '14.
[23] S. D. De Groote,et al. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. , 2012, Nursing outlook.
[24] Narongrit Sombatsompop,et al. Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[25] Vincent Larivière,et al. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.
[26] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages , 2013, Scientometrics.
[27] Henk F. Moed,et al. Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal: Book Reviews , 2005 .
[28] Martin Meyer,et al. What is Special about Patent Citations? Differences between Scientific and Patent Citations , 2000, Scientometrics.
[29] Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al. Reading factor as a credible alternative to impact factor: a preliminary study , 2000 .
[30] John Mingers,et al. Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management , 2010, Scientometrics.
[31] Mike Thelwall,et al. Evaluating altmetrics , 2013, Scientometrics.
[32] Joshua A Hirsch,et al. Guidelines warfare over interventional techniques: is there a lack of discourse or straw man? , 2012, Pain physician.
[33] Mike Thelwall,et al. Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities , 2002, Scientometrics.
[34] José Luis Ortega,et al. Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[35] José Luis Ortega,et al. Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[36] Martin Meyer,et al. Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology — What Can They Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology? , 2000, Scientometrics.
[37] Debora Shaw,et al. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[38] Regan A. R. Gurung,et al. Predicting Textbook Reading , 2011 .
[39] Massimo Franceschet,et al. A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2010, Scientometrics.
[40] Madian Khabsa,et al. Digital commons , 2020, Internet Policy Rev..
[41] Andreas Thor,et al. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[42] Henk F. Moed,et al. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .
[43] Adam Eyre-Walker,et al. The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations , 2013, PLoS biology.
[44] Mike Thelwall,et al. Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[45] A. Kulkarni,et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. , 2009, JAMA.
[46] Mike Thelwall,et al. The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[47] M. Tsay. The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. , 1998, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
[48] Charles Oppenheim,et al. Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.
[49] C. Nyquist,et al. An Academic Librarian's Response to the “ITHAKA Faculty Survey 2009: Key Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies” , 2010 .
[50] Robert D. Shelton,et al. Causal Connections between Scientometric Indicators: Which Ones Best Explain High-Technology Manufacturing Outputs? , 2015, ISSI.
[51] Alfred E. Hartemink,et al. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar , 2013, PeerJ.
[52] Yu-Wei Chang,et al. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[53] Mike Thelwall. Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective , 2012, Scientometrics.
[54] Lokman I. Meho,et al. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[55] Mike Thelwall,et al. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[56] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[57] Blaise Cronin,et al. Invoked on the Web , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[58] Blaise Cronin,et al. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..
[59] Gail Herrera,et al. Google Scholar Users and User Behaviors: An Exploratory Study , 2011, Coll. Res. Libr..
[60] Torill Mortensen,et al. Blogging thoughts: personal publication as an online research tool , 2002 .
[61] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between 2012 and 2013 , 2013, Scientometrics.
[62] Jack Meadows,et al. Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses , 2002, J. Documentation.
[63] Debora Shaw,et al. A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources , 2008, Scientometrics.
[64] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Web Impact Metrics for Research Assessment , 2014 .
[65] Jim Taylor,et al. Peer assessment of research : how many publications per staff? , 2009 .
[66] Martin Meyer,et al. Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems , 2002, Scientometrics.
[67] Michael H. MacRoberts,et al. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.
[68] Elaine Lasda Bergman,et al. Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar , 2012 .
[69] Julian Warner,et al. A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..
[70] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al. The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..
[71] Joost C. F. de Winter,et al. The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study , 2013, Scientometrics.
[72] Jennifer Mishra,et al. A Content Analysis of Introductory Courses in Music Education at NASM-Accredited Colleges and Universities , 2011 .
[73] Debora Shaw,et al. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[74] Philipp Mayr,et al. An exploratory study of Google Scholar , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..
[75] Liz Allen,et al. Tracking the impact of research on policy and practice: investigating the feasibility of using citations in clinical guidelines for research evaluation , 2012, BMJ Open.
[76] Nicolás Robinson-García,et al. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[77] Mike Thelwall,et al. Linked title mentions: a new automated link search candidate , 2014, Scientometrics.
[78] Massimo Franceschet,et al. The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[79] Mike Thelwall,et al. Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[80] Enrique Orduña-Malea,et al. Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar , 2014, Scientometrics.
[81] Martin S. Meyer,et al. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology:An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology , 2001, Scientometrics.
[82] Gordana Brumini,et al. Examining the Medical Blogosphere: An Online Survey of Medical Bloggers , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.
[83] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners , 2013, Scientometrics.
[84] Tony Stankus,et al. Handle With Care: Use and Citation Data for Science Journal Management , 1982, Scientific Journals: Issues in Library Selection and Management.
[85] S. A. Evans,et al. Multicultural Competence and Social Justice Training in Counseling Psychology and Counselor Education , 2009 .
[86] Nabil Amara,et al. Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science , 2012, Scientometrics.
[87] Alastair Smith,et al. A Tale of Two Web Spaces: Comparing Sites Using Web Impact Factors. , 1999 .
[88] Johan Bollen,et al. Usage bibliometrics , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[89] María José Luzón,et al. Scholarly hyperwriting: The function of links in academic weblogs , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[90] David B. Daniel,et al. Textbook Use and Learning: A North American Perspective , 2012 .
[91] Liwen Vaughan,et al. Relationship between links to journal Web sites and impact factors , 2002, Aslib Proc..
[92] Stephen S. Murray,et al. The bibliometric properties of article readership information , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[93] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses , 2008 .
[94] Juan Gorraiz,et al. Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals , 2010, Scientometrics.
[95] Mike Thelwall,et al. The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[96] M. Thelwall,et al. Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information , 2012, PloS one.
[97] Blaise Cronin,et al. Invoked on the Web , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[98] R. Rousseau. Sitations: an exploratory study , 1997 .
[99] Susanne Mikki,et al. Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences , 2010, Scientometrics.
[100] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Web-based analyses of E-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[101] Mike Thelwall,et al. An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[102] Péter Jacsó,et al. Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..
[103] Dominique Brossard,et al. Science News Consumption Patterns and Their Implications for Public Understanding of Science , 2015 .
[104] Cyril Labbé,et al. Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science? , 2012, Scientometrics.
[105] Paul Groth,et al. Studying Scientific Discourse on the Web Using Bibliometrics: A Chemistry Blogging Case Study , 2010 .
[106] Henk F. Moed,et al. Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[107] Ian Rowlands,et al. The missing link: journal usage metrics , 2007, Aslib Proc..
[108] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..
[109] Finn Årup Nielsen,et al. Scientific citations in Wikipedia , 2007, First Monday.
[110] A. Neely,et al. Citation Counts: Are They Good Predictors of Rae Scores? A Bibliometric Analysis of RAE 2001 , 2008 .
[111] Mike Thelwall,et al. Extracting macroscopic information from Web links , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[112] Péter Jacsó,et al. Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics” , 2011 .
[113] G. Kirkup. Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity , 2010 .
[114] Péter Jacsó,et al. Google Scholar revisited , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..
[115] I. Mewburn,et al. Why do academics blog? An analysis of audiences, purposes and challenges , 2013 .
[116] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Bias in peer review , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[117] María José Luzón,et al. Academic Weblogs as Tools for E-Collaboration Among Researchers , 2009 .
[118] Tony Stankus,et al. Wikipedia, Scholarpedia, and References to Journals in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences: A Comparison of Cited Sources and Recommended Readings in Matching Free Online Encyclopedia Entries , 2010 .
[119] John D. McDonald,et al. Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[120] Rob Kling,et al. Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[121] Christian Gumpenberger,et al. Going beyond Citations: SERUM — a new Tool Provided by a Network of Libraries , 2010 .
[122] Anton J. Nederhof,et al. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.
[123] Ronald Rousseau,et al. The journal download immediacy index (DII): experiences using a Chinese full-text database , 2010, Scientometrics.
[124] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon , 2004, Scientometrics.
[125] Johan Bollen,et al. Towards usage-based impact metrics: first results from the mesur project. , 2008, JCDL '08.
[126] Rory Ewins. Who are You? Weblogs and Academic Identity , 2005 .
[127] Rodrigo Costas,et al. Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[128] Mike Thelwall,et al. Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008 .
[129] Bradley M. Hemminger,et al. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact , 2012, ArXiv.
[130] N. Mohaghegh,et al. WHY THE IMPACT FACTOR OF JOURNALS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EVALUATING RESEARCH , 2005 .
[131] Mike Thelwall,et al. How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[132] Péter Jacsó,et al. Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[133] David King,et al. Identifying Audiences of E-Infrastructures - Tools for Measuring Impact , 2012, PloS one.
[134] Anne-Wil Harzing,et al. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis , 2008 .
[135] Sara Kjellberg,et al. I am a blogging researcher: Motivations for blogging in a scholarly context , 2010, First Monday.
[136] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics' , 1997, J. Documentation.
[137] Euan A. Adie,et al. Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article‐level discussion and metrics , 2013, Learn. Publ..
[138] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.
[139] Christy Caldwell,et al. Shifting Sands: Science Researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with Implications for Library Collections Budgets. , 2010 .
[140] Mike Thelwall,et al. Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.
[141] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science , 2010, Scientometrics.
[142] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.
[143] Antal van den Bosch,et al. A Longitudinal Analysis of Search Engine Index Size , 2015, ISSI.
[144] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Web-based analyses of E-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[145] Liwen Vaughan,et al. Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination , 2006 .