Evaluation of the Effect of Fingolimod Treatment on Microglial Activation Using Serial PET Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis

Traditionally, multiple sclerosis (MS) has been considered a white matter disease with focal inflammatory lesions. It is, however, becoming clear that significant pathology, such as microglial activation, also takes place outside the plaque areas, that is, in areas of normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and gray matter (GM). Microglial activation can be detected in vivo using 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO)–binding radioligands and PET. It is unknown whether fingolimod affects microglial activation in MS. The aim of this study was to investigate whether serial PET can be used to evaluate the effect of fingolimod treatment on microglial activation. Methods: Ten relapsing-remitting MS patients were studied using the TSPO radioligand 11C-(R)-PK11195. Imaging was performed at baseline and after 8 and 24 wk of fingolimod treatment. Eight healthy individuals were imaged for comparison. Microglial activation was evaluated as distribution volume ratio of 11C‐(R)-PK11195. Results: The patients had MS for an average of 7.9 ± 4.3 y (mean ± SD), their total relapses averaged 4 ± 2.4, and their Expanded Disability Status Scale was 2.7 ± 0.5. The patients were switched to fingolimod because of safety reasons or therapy escalation. The mean washout period before the initiation of fingolimod was 2.3 ± 1.1 mo. The patients were clinically stable on fingolimod. At baseline, microglial activation was significantly higher in the combined NAWM and GM areas of MS patients than in healthy controls (P = 0.021). 11C‐(R)-PK11195 binding was reduced (−12.31%) within the combined T2 lesion area after 6 mo of fingolimod treatment (P = 0.040) but not in the areas of NAWM or GM. Conclusion: Fingolimod treatment reduced microglial/macrophage activation at the site of focal inflammatory lesions, presumably by preventing leukocyte trafficking from the periphery. It did not affect the widespread, diffuse microglial activation in the NAWM and GM. The study opens new vistas for designing future therapeutic studies in MS that use the evaluation of microglial activation as an imaging outcome measure.

[1]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Oral fingolimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (INFORMS): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Rinne,et al.  Imaging neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis using TSPO-PET , 2015, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[3]  D. Ontaneda,et al.  Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  B. Trapp,et al.  Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  J. Newcombe,et al.  Fingolimod may support neuroprotection via blockade of astrocyte nitric oxide , 2014, Annals of neurology.

[6]  V. Perry,et al.  Review: Activation patterns of microglia and their identification in the human brain , 2013, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[7]  P. Matthews,et al.  Increased PK11195 PET binding in the cortex of patients with MS correlates with disability , 2012, Neurology.

[8]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  Peter A. Calabresi,et al.  Decreased microglial activation in MS patients treated with glatiramer acetate , 2012, Journal of Neurology.

[10]  Elizabeth Fisher,et al.  Multiple sclerosis normal‐appearing white matter: Pathology–imaging correlations , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[11]  J. Chun,et al.  The neurobiology of sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators , 2011, Neurology.

[12]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[13]  D. Herr,et al.  FTY720 (fingolimod) efficacy in an animal model of multiple sclerosis requires astrocyte sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) modulation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Komada,et al.  Activated Microglia Mediate Axoglial Disruption That Contributes to Axonal Injury in Multiple Sclerosis , 2010, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[15]  Hans Lassmann,et al.  The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Reference and target region modeling of [11C]-(R)-PK11195 brain studies. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  R. Proia,et al.  Lymphocyte egress from thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs is dependent on S1P receptor 1 , 2004, Nature.

[20]  H. Rosen,et al.  Alteration of Lymphocyte Trafficking by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Agonists , 2002, Science.

[21]  R B Banati,et al.  The peripheral benzodiazepine binding site in the brain in multiple sclerosis: quantitative in vivo imaging of microglia as a measure of disease activity. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  A. Evans,et al.  Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.