Automated cryoEM data acquisition and analysis of 284742 particles of GroEL.

One of the goals in developing our automated electron microscopy data acquisition system, Leginon, was to improve both the ease of use and the throughput of the process of acquiring low dose images of macromolecular specimens embedded in vitreous ice. In this article, we demonstrate the potential of the Leginon system for high-throughput data acquisition by describing an experiment in which we acquired images of more than 280,000 particles of GroEL in a single 25 h session at the microscope. We also demonstrate the potential for an automated pipeline for molecular microscopy by showing that these particles can be subjected to completely automated procedures to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) density map to a resolution better than 8 A. In generating the 3D maps, we used a variety of metadata associated with the data acquisition and processing steps to sort and select the particles. These metadata provide a number of insights into factors that affect the quality of the acquired images and the resulting reconstructions. In particular, we show that the resolution of the reconstructed 3D density maps improves with decreasing ice thickness. These data provide a basis for assessing the capabilities of high-throughput macromolecular microscopy.

[1]  Robert M Glaeser,et al.  Historical background: Why is it important to improve automated particle selection methods? , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  N. Unwin,et al.  Structure and action of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor explored by electron microscopy , 2003, FEBS letters.

[3]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  Bridget Carragher,et al.  Temperature Monitoring of an EM Environment , 2006, Microscopy Today.

[5]  Denis Fellmann,et al.  A relational database for cryoEM: experience at one year and 50 000 images. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  R. Glaeser Review: electron crystallography: present excitement, a nod to the past, anticipating the future. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  Bridget Carragher,et al.  Contaminant detection: improving template matching based particle selection for cryoelectron microscopy , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[8]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  W. Chiu,et al.  Seeing GroEL at 6 A resolution by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. , 2004, Structure.

[10]  J Pulokas,et al.  Improving the positional accuracy of the goniometer on the Philips CM series TEM. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[11]  Anchi Cheng,et al.  Does contamination buildup limit throughput for automated cryoEM? , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[12]  J Pulokas,et al.  Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  S Subramaniam,et al.  Automated data collection with a Tecnai 12 electron microscope: applications for molecular imaging by cryomicroscopy. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[14]  B. Gowen,et al.  ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2001, Cell.

[15]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Noise bias in the refinement of structures derived from single particles. , 2004, Ultramicroscopy.

[16]  A. Roseman Particle finding in electron micrographs using a fast local correlation algorithm. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[17]  H. Saibil,et al.  Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  J. Frank Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies: Visualization of Biological Molecules in Their Native State , 1996 .

[19]  A. Horwich,et al.  Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[20]  Stephen C. Harvey,et al.  Yammp: Development of a molecular mechanics program using the modular programming method , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  R. Henderson The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules , 1995, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[22]  J. Frank,et al.  Solution Structure of the E. coli 70S Ribosome at 11.5 Å Resolution , 2000, Cell.

[23]  Clinton S Potter,et al.  ACE: automated CTF estimation. , 2005, Ultramicroscopy.

[24]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[25]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  Anchi Cheng,et al.  Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[27]  H. Stark,et al.  Advantages of CCD detectors for de novo three-dimensional structure determination in single-particle electron microscopy. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[28]  Bridget Carragher,et al.  Improving Automation for Cryo-EM Specimen Preparation , 2004, Microscopy and Microanalysis.