From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Villeneuve,et al. Chromosome-Wide Control of Meiotic Crossing over in C. elegans , 2003, Current Biology.
[2] D. Zickler,et al. Altering a Gene Involved in Nuclear Distribution Increases the Repeat-Induced Point Mutation Process in the Fungus Podospora anserina , 2004, Genetics.
[3] A. Murray,et al. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.
[4] S. Keeney,et al. Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start? , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[5] B. Wakimoto,et al. The teflon gene is required for maintenance of autosomal homolog pairing at meiosis I in male Drosophila melanogaster. , 2001, Genetics.
[6] G. Jenkins,et al. Nuclear dispositions of subtelomeric and pericentromeric chromosomal domains during meiosis in asynaptic mutants of rye (Secale cereale L.). , 2001, Journal of cell science.
[7] D. Agard,et al. Specific interactions of chromatin with the nuclear envelope: positional determination within the nucleus in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.
[8] S. Keeney,et al. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. , 2001, Current topics in developmental biology.
[9] S. Henikoff,et al. Large-scale Chromosomal Movements During Interphase Progression in Drosophila , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.
[10] B. Lu. Spreading the synaptonemal complex of Neurospora crassa , 1993, Chromosoma.
[11] M. Whitby. Making crossovers during meiosis. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.
[12] R. Aramayo,et al. Unpaired genes do not silence their paired neighbors , 2003, Current Genetics.
[13] Naohiro Kato,et al. Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Females Depends on Chromosome Continuity Between Genetically Defined Boundaries , 2005, Genetics.
[14] S. Keeney,et al. Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. , 2000, Genes & development.
[15] N. Kleckner,et al. The Single-End Invasion An Asymmetric Intermediate at the Double-Strand Break to Double-Holliday Junction Transition of Meiotic Recombination , 2001, Cell.
[16] J. Fuchs,et al. Chromosome associations in budding yeast caused by integrated tandemly repeated transgenes. , 2002, Journal of cell science.
[17] B. F. Vaniushin,et al. [DNA methylation and epigenetics]. , 2006, Genetika.
[18] N. Kleckner,et al. Meiotic double-strand breaks at the interface of chromosome movement, chromosome remodeling, and reductional division. , 2003, Genes & development.
[19] A. Nicolas,et al. Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination , 2002, Cell.
[20] A. Rose,et al. The genetics of meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[21] Yasushi Hiraoka,et al. Meiotic nuclear reorganization: switching the position of centromeres and telomeres in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 1997, The EMBO journal.
[22] P. Pukkila,et al. Silver staining of meiotic chromosomes in the fungus, Coprinus cinereus , 2004, Chromosoma.
[23] J. Schimenti,et al. Synapsis or silence , 2005, Nature Genetics.
[24] N. Kleckner,et al. Crossover/Noncrossover Differentiation, Synaptonemal Complex Formation, and Regulatory Surveillance at the Leptotene/Zygotene Transition of Meiosis , 2004, Cell.
[25] Steven S. Branda,et al. The Sgs1 Helicase Regulates Chromosome Synapsis and Meiotic Crossing Over , 2003, Current Biology.
[26] E. Nimmo,et al. Regulation of telomere length and function by a Myb-domain protein in fission yeast , 1997, Nature.
[27] A. Villeneuve,et al. Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. , 2002, Genes & development.
[28] S. W. Rasmussen,et al. The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. , 1984, Annual review of genetics.
[29] O. Niwa,et al. Telomere‐led bouquet formation facilitates homologous chromosome pairing and restricts ectopic interaction in fission yeast meiosis , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[30] N. Kleckner,et al. Localization and roles of Ski8p protein in Sordaria meiosis and delineation of three mechanistically distinct steps of meiotic homolog juxtaposition , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] E. Lam,et al. Tandem repetitive transgenes and fluorescent chromatin tags alter local interphase chromosome arrangement in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.
[32] Peter J Shaw,et al. The architecture of interphase chromosomes and nucleolar transcription sites in plants. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.
[33] M. Matzke,et al. Position effects and epigenetic silencing of plant transgenes. , 1998, Current opinion in plant biology.
[34] R. Hawley,et al. All Paired Up with No Place to Go: Pairing, Synapsis, and DSB Formation in a Balancer Heterozygote , 2005, PLoS genetics.
[35] P. Cohen,et al. The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. , 2002, Journal of cell science.
[36] D. Zickler,et al. Correlation between pairing initiation sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora. , 1992, Genetics.
[37] M. Bojko. Two kinds of "recombination nodules" in Neurospora crassa. , 1989, Genome.
[38] R. Eils,et al. Aspects of three-dimensional chromosome reorganization during the onset of human male meiotic prophase. , 1998, Journal of cell science.
[39] V. Pirrotta. Transvection and chromosomal trans-interaction effects. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[40] P. Moens. The fine structure of meiotic chromosome polarization and pairing in Locusta migratoria spermatocytes , 2004, Chromosoma.
[41] S M Burgess,et al. Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization. , 1999, Genes & development.
[42] T. Cremer,et al. Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] R. Pearlman,et al. Rad51 and Dmc1 Form Mixed Complexes Associated with Mouse Meiotic Chromosome Cores and Synaptonemal Complexes , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.
[44] M. Bojko. Human meiosis VIII. Chromosome pairing and formation of the synaptonemal complex in oocytes , 1983 .
[45] R. Jorgensen,et al. Altered gene expression in plants due to trans interactions between homologous genes. , 1990, Trends in biotechnology.
[46] Y. Hiraoka,et al. Linear element formation and their role in meiotic sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome pairing , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[47] M. Moses. Chromosomal Structures in Crayfish Spermatocytes , 1956, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.
[48] Abby Dernburg,et al. Homologous Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster Proceeds through Multiple Independent Initiations , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.
[49] Ingo Schubert,et al. Interphase chromosomes in Arabidopsis are organized as well defined chromocenters from which euchromatin loops emanate , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] J. Noguchi. Homolog pairing and two kinds of bouquets in the meiotic prophase of rye, Secale cereale. , 2002, Genes & genetic systems.
[51] James R. Knight,et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.
[52] S. Keeney,et al. Identification of Residues in Yeast Spo11p Critical for Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[53] A. Villeneuve,et al. A Component of C. elegans Meiotic Chromosome Axes at the Interface of Homolog Alignment, Synapsis, Nuclear Reorganization, and Recombination , 2004, Current Biology.
[54] E. Selker,et al. A cytosine methyltransferase homologue is essential for repeat-induced point mutation in Neurospora crassa , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[55] B. McKee. Pairing sites and the role of chromosome pairing in meiosis and spermatogenesis in male Drosophila. , 1998, Current topics in developmental biology.
[56] Josef Loidl,et al. Meiotic telomere clustering requires actin for its formation and cohesin for its resolution , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.
[57] R. Metzenberg,et al. Meiotic Silencing by Unpaired DNA , 2001, Cell.
[58] A. Dernburg,et al. HIM-8 Binds to the X Chromosome Pairing Center and Mediates Chromosome-Specific Meiotic Synapsis , 2005, Cell.
[59] R. Hawley,et al. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. , 2001, Genes & development.
[60] V. Paquis‐Flucklinger,et al. Association between MSH4 (MutS homologue 4) and the DNA strand-exchange RAD51 and DMC1 proteins during mammalian meiosis. , 2004, Molecular human reproduction.
[61] N. Kleckner,et al. Potential advantages of unstable interactions for pairing of chromosomes in meiotic, somatic, and premeiotic cells. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.
[62] B. Liebe,et al. Telomere attachment, meiotic chromosome condensation, pairing, and bouquet stage duration are modified in spermatocytes lacking axial elements. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.
[63] J. Logsdon,et al. Identification of Two Proteins Required for Conjunction and Regular Segregation of Achiasmate Homologs in Drosophila Male Meiosis , 2005, Cell.
[64] G. Kreth,et al. Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes , 2004, Chromosoma.
[65] V. Malhotra,et al. Rothman and Schekman SNAREd by Lasker for Trafficking , 2002, Cell.
[66] J. Rossignol,et al. Gene inactivation triggered by recognition between DNA repeats , 1994, Experientia.
[67] I. Golubovskaya,et al. Altered Nuclear Distribution of Recombination Protein RAD51 in Maize Mutants Suggests the Involvement of RAD51 in Meiotic Homology Recognition Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.012898. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.
[68] A. Goldman,et al. The efficiency of meiotic recombination between dispersed sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends upon their chromosomal location. , 1996, Genetics.
[69] J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al. The absence of the somatic association of centromeres of homologous chromosomes in grass mitotic metaphases , 2004, Chromosoma.
[70] Hank W. Bass,et al. Telomeres Cluster De Novo before the Initiation of Synapsis: A Three-dimensional Spatial Analysis of Telomere Positions before and during Meiotic Prophase , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.
[71] R. Martienssen,et al. DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi. , 2001, Science.
[72] Harry Scherthan,et al. Meiotic Telomere Protein Ndj1p Is Required for Meiosis-Specific Telomere Distribution, Bouquet Formation and Efficient Homologue Pairing , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.
[73] Carrie R Cowan,et al. Meiotic telomere clustering is inhibited by colchicine but does not require cytoplasmic microtubules , 2002, Journal of Cell Science.
[74] M. Yanagida,et al. Telomere-led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. , 1994, Science.
[75] J. Sedat,et al. Direct Evidence of a Role for Heterochromatin in Meiotic Chromosome Segregation , 1996, Cell.
[76] M. Zolan,et al. Replication-dependent early meiotic requirement for Spo11 and Rad50. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[77] C. Heyting,et al. Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. , 2005, Genes & development.
[78] Y. Hiraoka,et al. A novel meiosis‐specific protein of fission yeast, Meu13p, promotes homologous pairing independently of homologous recombination , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[79] Seema Agarwal,et al. Zip3 Provides a Link between Recombination Enzymes and Synaptonemal Complex Proteins , 2000, Cell.
[80] H. Scherthan,et al. Homologous pairing is reduced but not abolished in asynaptic mutants of yeast , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.
[81] S. Stack,et al. Somatic Pairing as a Regular Preliminary to Meiosis , 1968 .
[82] G. Moore,et al. Centromeric behaviour in wheat with high and low homoeologous chromosomal pairing , 1997, Chromosoma.
[83] J. Galagan,et al. RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[84] P. Shaw,et al. Polyploidy Induces Centromere Association , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.
[85] D. Zickler,et al. Synaptonemal complex formation and distribution of recombination nodules in pachytene trivalents of triploid Coprinus cinereus , 1981 .
[86] N. Kleckner,et al. Somatic pairing of homologs in budding yeast: existence and modulation. , 1999, Genes & development.
[87] M. Grelon,et al. AtSPO11‐1 is necessary for efficient meiotic recombination in plants , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[88] M. J. Neale,et al. Wild-type levels of Spo11-induced DSBs are required for normal single-strand resection during meiosis. , 2002, Molecules and Cells.
[89] A. Lustig,et al. Ndj1p-Dependent Epigenetic Resetting of Telomere Size in Yeast Meiosis , 2005, Current Biology.
[90] A. Villeneuve,et al. Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination. , 2003, Developmental cell.
[91] W. Z. Cande,et al. The pam1 gene is required for meiotic bouquet formation and efficient homologous synapsis in maize (Zea mays L.). , 2002, Genetics.
[92] N. Kleckner,et al. Identification of double holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination , 1995, Cell.
[93] K. McKim,et al. Relationship of DNA double-strand breaks to synapsis in Drosophila , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[94] D. Zickler,et al. Chromosome pairing, recombination nodules and chiasma formation in the basidiomycete coprinus cinereus , 1981 .
[95] R. Rothstein,et al. Three-Dimensional Microscopy of the Rad51 Recombination Protein during Meiotic Prophase , 1999, Plant Cell.
[96] Nancy Kleckner,et al. Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast , 1994, Cell.
[97] Paul Nurse,et al. Fission yeast Taz1 protein is required for meiotic telomere clustering and recombination , 1998, Nature.
[98] M. Primig,et al. Novel Response to Microtubule Perturbation in Meiosis , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[99] M. P. Maguire,et al. The relationship of homologous synapsis and crossing over in a maize inversion. , 1994, Genetics.
[100] J. Walter,et al. A Gene Essential for De Novo Methylation and Development in Ascobolus Reveals a Novel Type of Eukaryotic DNA Methyltransferase Structure , 1997, Cell.
[101] D. K. Bishop. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis , 1994, Cell.
[102] I. Schubert,et al. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species , 2004, Chromosome Research.
[103] D. Walpita,et al. MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[104] P. Shaw,et al. Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat. , 1999, Journal of cell science.
[105] R. Metzenberg,et al. SAD-2 is required for meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA and perinuclear localization of SAD-1 RNA-directed RNA polymerase , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[106] B. Mcclintock. The association of non-homologous parts of chromosomes in the mid-prophase of meiosis in zea mays , 1933, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.
[107] M. Zolan,et al. Multiple roles of Spo11 in meiotic chromosome behavior , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[108] Harry Scherthan,et al. A bouquet makes ends meet , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[109] Josef Loidl,et al. Chromosome Pairing Does Not Contribute to Nuclear Architecture in Vegetative Yeast Cells , 2003, Eukaryotic Cell.
[110] S. W. Rasmussen. The transformation of the synaptonemal complex into the “elimination chromatin” in Bombyx mori oocytes , 1977, Chromosoma.
[111] M. Blasco,et al. Irregular telomeres impair meiotic synapsis and recombination in mice. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[112] B. McKee. Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[113] L. Anderson,et al. Recombination nodules in plants , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.
[114] J. Dekker,et al. Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.
[115] J. Vrána,et al. Evidence that intergenic spacer repeats of Drosophila melanogaster rRNA genes function as X-Y pairing sites in male meiosis, and a general model for achiasmatic pairing. , 1992, Genetics.
[116] R. Camerini-Otero,et al. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. , 2000, Molecular cell.
[117] J. Rossignol,et al. How does the cell count the number of ectopic copies of a gene in the premeiotic inactivation process acting in Ascobolus immersus? , 1990, Genetics.
[118] R. Hawley. Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. , 1980, Genetics.
[119] H. Scherthan,et al. Bouquet formation in budding yeast: initiation of recombination is not required for meiotic telomere clustering. , 1999, Journal of cell science.
[120] N. Kleckner,et al. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.
[121] Y. Hiraoka,et al. Oscillatory nuclear movement in fission yeast meiotic prophase is driven by astral microtubules, as revealed by continuous observation of chromosomes and microtubules in living cells. , 1998, Journal of cell science.
[122] M. Zolan,et al. Homolog pairing and meiotic progression in Coprinus cinereus , 1999, Chromosoma.
[123] J. Sekelsky,et al. Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. , 1998, Science.
[124] A. Villeneuve,et al. HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. , 2005, Genes & development.
[125] N. Kleckner,et al. The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis. , 1998, Annual review of genetics.
[126] R. Aramayo,et al. An argonaute-like protein is required for meiotic silencing. , 2003, Genetics.
[127] C. Grey,et al. Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. , 2005, Molecular cell.
[128] V. Colot,et al. Interchromosomal Transfer of Epigenetic States in Ascobolus: Transfer of DNA Methylation Is Mechanistically Related to Homologous Recombination , 1996, Cell.
[129] D. Fawcett. THE FINE STRUCTURE OF CHROMOSOMES IN THE MEIOTIC PROPHASE OF VERTEBRATE SPERMATOCYTES , 1956, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.
[130] S. Henikoff. Nuclear organization and gene expression: homologous pairing and long-range interactions. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.
[131] R. Metzenberg,et al. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA: properties, regulation and suppression. , 2002, Genetics.
[132] H. Scherthan,et al. Dynamics of chromosome organization and pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.
[133] E. Lam,et al. Chromatin of endoreduplicated pavement cells has greater range of movement than that of diploid guard cells in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[134] N. Kleckner,et al. Physical and Functional Interactions among Basic Chromosome Organizational Features Govern Early Steps of Meiotic Chiasma Formation , 2002, Cell.
[135] T. Schwarzacher. Three stages of meiotic homologous chromosome pairing in wheat: cognition, alignment and synapsis , 1997, Sexual Plant Reproduction.
[136] A. Villeneuve,et al. Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. , 2001, Genes & development.
[137] A. Villeneuve,et al. Chromosome Sites Play Dual Roles to Establish Homologous Synapsis during Meiosis in C. elegans , 2005, Cell.
[138] N. M. Hollingsworth,et al. The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of double-Holliday junction resolution to promote a distinct subset of crossovers during meiosis in budding yeast. , 2003, Genetics.
[139] Michael G. Sehorn,et al. Rad51 Recombinase and Recombination Mediators* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[140] C. Heyting,et al. The effect of the wheat Ph1 locus on chromatin organisation and meiotic chromosome pairing analysed by genome painting , 1998, Chromosoma.
[141] G. H. Jones,et al. Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum , 1987, Chromosoma.
[142] Y. Hiraoka,et al. Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. , 2004, Developmental cell.
[143] A. Villeneuve. A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1994, Genetics.
[144] S. Keeney,et al. Meiosis-Specific DNA Double-Strand Breaks Are Catalyzed by Spo11, a Member of a Widely Conserved Protein Family , 1997, Cell.
[145] M. Maguire. The mechanism of meiotic homologue pairing. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.
[146] B. McKee,et al. The distribution of male meiotic pairing sites on chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster: meiotic pairing and segregation of 2-Y transpositions , 1993, Chromosoma.
[147] E. Sanchez-Moran,et al. The Arabidopsis synaptonemal complex protein ZYP1 is required for chromosome synapsis and normal fidelity of crossing over. , 2005, Genes & development.
[148] J. Haber. Searching for a Partner , 1998, Science.
[149] P. Holm,et al. Human meiosis II. Chromosome pairing and recombination nodules in human spermatocytes , 1978 .
[150] S. Burgess,et al. Close, stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast is dependent on meiotic recombination, occurs independently of synapsis, and is distinct from DSB-independent pairing contacts. , 2002, Genes & development.
[151] B. McKee. The license to pair: Identification of meiotic pairing sites inDrosophila , 1996, Chromosoma.
[152] T. Cremer,et al. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[153] Nancy Kleckner,et al. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[154] N. Raju,et al. Meiosis in Coprinus , 1970, Chromosoma.
[155] P. Wilson,et al. Plant chromosome homology: hypotheses relating rendezvous, recognition and reciprocal exchange , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.
[156] S. Keeney,et al. Communication between homologous chromosomes: genetic alterations at a nuclease‐hypersensitive site can alter mitotic chromatin structure at that site both in cis and in trans , 1996, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.
[157] J. Loidl. The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view. , 1990, Genome.
[158] D. Kaback,et al. In Vivo Analysis of Synaptonemal Complex Formation During Yeast Meiosis , 2004, Genetics.
[159] J. Sedat,et al. The Dynamics of Homologous Chromosome Pairing during Male Drosophila Meiosis , 2002, Current Biology.
[160] R. Hawley,et al. There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females, one of which requires heterochromatic homology. , 1992, Developmental genetics.
[161] Scott Keeney,et al. Tying synaptonemal complex initiation to the formation and programmed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[162] Hasanuzzaman Bhuiyan,et al. Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis in Yeast Can Occur Without Spo11-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks , 2004, Genetics.
[163] A. Villeneuve,et al. Meiotic Recombination in C. elegans Initiates by a Conserved Mechanism and Is Dispensable for Homologous Chromosome Synapsis , 1998, Cell.
[164] R. Padmore,et al. Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae , 1991, Cell.
[165] S. Keeney,et al. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. , 2000, Molecular cell.
[166] P. Verveer,et al. Homologous association of the Bithorax-Complex during embryogenesis: consequences for transvection in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1998, Development.
[167] A. Cabrera,et al. Chromosomal distribution of telomeric and telomeric-associated sequences in Hordeum chilense by in situ hybridization. , 2004, Hereditas.
[168] J. McIntosh,et al. A Cytoplasmic Dynein Heavy Chain Is Required for Oscillatory Nuclear Movement of Meiotic Prophase and Efficient Meiotic Recombination in Fission Yeast , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.
[169] J. Higgins,et al. The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. , 2004, Genes & development.
[170] M. Bojko. Presence of abnormal synaptonemal complexes in heterothallic species of Neurospora. , 1988, Genome.
[171] Peter M Carlton,et al. Directed motion of telomeres in the formation of the meiotic bouquet revealed by time course and simulation analysis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.
[172] Josef Loidl,et al. Yeast Nuclei Display Prominent Centromere Clustering That Is Reduced in Nondividing Cells and in Meiotic Prophase , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.
[173] H. Scherthan,et al. Meiotic Telomere Distribution and Sertoli Cell Nuclear Architecture Are Altered in Atm- andAtm-p53-Deficient Mice , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[174] G. Roeder,et al. Imposition of Crossover Interference through the Nonrandom Distribution of Synapsis Initiation Complexes , 2004, Cell.
[175] D. Zickler. Development of the synaptonemal complex and the “recombination nodules” during meiotic prophase in the seven bivalents of the fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw , 1977, Chromosoma.