Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences

This study addresses the role of cognitive control in the initiation and execution of familiar and unfamiliar movement sequences. To become familiar with two movement sequences participants first practiced two discrete key press sequences by responding to two fixed series of 6-key specific stimuli. In the ensuing test phase they executed these two familiar and also two unfamiliar keying sequences while there was a two-third chance a tone was presented together with one randomly selected key specific stimulus in each sequence. In the counting condition of the test phase participants counted the low pitched (i.e., target) tones. By and large the results support the dual processor model in which the prime role of the cognitive processor shifts from executing to initiating sequences while the gradual development of motor chunks allows a motor processor to execute the sequences. Yet, the results extend this simple model by suggesting that with little practice sequence execution is based also on some non-cognitive (perhaps associative) learning mechanism and, for some participants, on the use of explicit sequence knowledge. Also, after extensive practice the cognitive processor appears to still contribute to slower responses. The occurrence of long interkey intervals was replicated suggesting that fixed 6-key sequences include several motor chunks. Yet, no indication was found that the cognitive processor is responsible for concatenating these chunks.

[1]  T. Carr,et al.  Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. , 1989 .

[2]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Representations underlying skill in the discrete sequence production task: effect of hand used and hand position , 2008, Psychological research.

[3]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Modes of executive control in sequence learning: from stimulus-based to plan-based control. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  W B Verwey,et al.  Concatenating familiar movement sequences: the versatile cognitive processor. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[5]  I Koch,et al.  Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks , 2000, Psychological research.

[6]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Taking patterns for chunks: is there any evidence of chunk learning in continuous serial reaction-time tasks? , 2008, Psychological research.

[8]  R. Seidler,et al.  Visuospatial working memory capacity predicts the organization of acquired explicit motor sequences. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Steven E. Petersen,et al.  Intermanual transfer effects in sequential tactuomotor learning: Evidence for effector independent coding , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[12]  R. Seidler,et al.  Age-related declines in visuospatial working memory correlate with deficits in explicit motor sequence learning. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  William B Verwey,et al.  Evidence for Lasting Sequence Segmentation in the Discrete Sequence-Production Task , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  W. Verwey.  BUFFER LOADING AND CHUNKING IN SEQUENTIAL KEYPRESSING , 1996 .

[15]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Diminished motor skill development in elderly: indications for limited motor chunk use. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  Learning of Similar Complex Movement Sequences: Proactive and Retroactive Effects on Learning , 2006, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  D. Raab.  DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[18]  Jack van Honk,et al.  On the role of the SMA in the discrete sequence production task: a TMS study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Willem B Verwey,et al.  Motor Learning and Chunking in Dyslexia , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  Robert Gottsdanker,et al.  Studying reaction time with nonaging intervals: An effective procedure , 1986 .

[21]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[22]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[23]  D. Raab.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. , 1962, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  T E Becker,et al.  Latency , 1979 .

[25]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[26]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[29]  H van Mier,et al.  The effects of motor complexity and practice on initiation time in writing and drawing. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. , 1999 .

[31]  C. Gallistel.  The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis , 1982 .

[32]  Willem B Verwey,et al.  Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences , 2003, Psychological research.

[33]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Emergence of rhythm during motor learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  The attention demands of movements. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[35]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep-dependent learning and motor-skill complexity. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[36]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  On-line programming of simple movement sequences , 1997 .

[37]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  Inter-manual transfer and practice: coding of simple motor sequences. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Learning and production of movement sequences: behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. , 2004, Human movement science.

[39]  W. Verwey.  Effects of extended practice in a one-finger keypressing task. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[40]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  D. Broadbent.  Levels, Hierarchies, and the Locus of Control* , 1977 .

[42]  H Heuer,et al.  Secondary-task effects on sequence learning , 1996, Psychological research.

[43]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Sequence Learning: Response Structure and Effector Transfer , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  W. Verwey,et al.  Practicing a Structured Continuous Key-Pressing Task: Motor Chunking or Rhythm Consolidation? , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[47]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[48]  D J Povel,et al.  Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[49]  W. Verwey.  Effect of Sequence Length on the Execution of Familiar Keying Sequences: Lasting Segmentation and Preparation? , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.