Machine learning corrected quantum dynamics calculations

Quantum scattering calculations for all but low-dimensional systems at low energies must rely on approximations. All approximations introduce errors. The impact of these errors is often difficult to assess because they depend on the Hamiltonian parameters and the particular observable under study. Here, we illustrate a general, system and approximation-independent, approach to improve the accuracy of quantum dynamics approximations. The method is based on a Bayesian machine learning (BML) algorithm that is trained by a small number of rigorous results and a large number of approximate calculations, resulting in ML models that accurately capture the dependence of the dynamics results on the quantum dynamics parameters. Most importantly, the present work demonstrates that the BML models can generalize quantum results to different dynamical processes. Thus, a ML model trained by a combination of approximate and rigorous results for a certain inelastic transition can make accurate predictions for different transitions without rigorous calculations. This opens the possibility of improving the accuracy of approximate calculations for quantum transitions that are out of reach of rigorous scattering calculations.

[1]  R. Krems,et al.  Gaussian Process Model for Collision Dynamics of Complex Molecules. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[2]  R. C. Forrey,et al.  Full-dimensional quantum dynamics of CO in collision with H2. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Matthias Rupp,et al.  Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The Δ-Machine Learning Approach. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[4]  Aditya Kamath,et al.  Neural networks vs Gaussian process regression for representing potential energy surfaces: A comparative study of fit quality and vibrational spectrum accuracy. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  Andrew S. Darmawan,et al.  Restricted Boltzmann machine learning for solving strongly correlated quantum systems , 2017, 1709.06475.

[6]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Additive Gaussian Processes , 2011, NIPS.

[7]  È. Roueff,et al.  Molecular excitation in the interstellar medium: recent advances in collisional, radiative, and chemical processes. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[8]  R. C. Forrey,et al.  A full-dimensional quantum dynamical study of H2+H2 collisions: coupled-states versus close-coupling formulation. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  R. C. Forrey,et al.  ROTATIONAL QUENCHING OF CO DUE TO H2 COLLISIONS , 2010, 1004.3923.

[10]  J. Bowman,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach for Prediction of Rate Constants. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[11]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[12]  O. Anatole von Lilienfeld,et al.  Quantum Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space , 2018 .

[13]  Kristof T. Schütt,et al.  Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[14]  Joel M. Bowman,et al.  Reduced dimensionality theory of quantum reactive scattering , 1991 .

[15]  R. C. Forrey,et al.  Quantum dynamics of CO–H2 in full dimensionality , 2015, Nature Communications.

[16]  Oliver T. Unke,et al.  Exhaustive state-to-state cross sections for reactive molecular collisions from importance sampling simulation and a neural network representation. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  E Weinan,et al.  Solving many-electron Schrödinger equation using deep neural networks , 2018, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  Sébastien Marmin Bayesian calibration of computer models with modern Gaussian process emulators , 2018 .

[19]  R. C. Forrey,et al.  Full-Dimensional Quantum Dynamics of SiO in Collision with H2. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[20]  A. Arthurs,et al.  The theory of scattering by a rigid rotator , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[21]  H. Schaefer,et al.  Multi-fidelity Gaussian process modeling for chemical energy surfaces , 2019, Chemical Physics Letters.

[22]  J. Hutson Coupled channel methods for solving the bound-state Schrödinger equation , 1994 .

[23]  Hao Wu,et al.  Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning , 2018, Science.

[24]  Bayesian optimization for the inverse scattering problem in quantum reaction dynamics , 2017, New Journal of Physics.

[25]  Hua Guo,et al.  Stereodynamical Control of a Quantum Scattering Resonance in Cold Molecular Collisions. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[26]  M. Berciu Few-particle Green's functions for strongly correlated systems on infinite lattices. , 2011, Physical Review Letters.

[27]  Bryan K. Clark,et al.  Backflow Transformations via Neural Networks for Quantum Many-Body Wave Functions. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[28]  R. Zare,et al.  Quantum control of molecular collisions at 1 kelvin , 2017, Science.

[29]  R. A. Vargas-Hernández,et al.  Extrapolating Quantum Observables with Machine Learning: Inferring Multiple Phase Transitions from Properties of a Single Phase. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[30]  J.P.C. Kleijnen Comments on M.C. Kennedy & A. O'Hagan : 'Bayesian calibration of computer models' , 2001 .

[31]  R. V. Krems,et al.  Bayesian machine learning for quantum molecular dynamics. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[32]  G. Carleo,et al.  Fermionic neural-network states for ab-initio electronic structure , 2019, Nature Communications.

[33]  R. Krems Molecules in Electromagnetic Fields , 2018 .

[34]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Structure Discovery in Nonparametric Regression through Compositional Kernel Search , 2013, ICML.

[35]  Dong H. Zhang,et al.  Uniform J-shifting approach for calculating reaction rate constant , 1999 .

[36]  N. Balakrishnan Perspective: Ultracold molecules and the dawn of cold controlled chemistry. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[37]  H. Saito Solving the Bose–Hubbard Model with Machine Learning , 2017, 1707.09723.

[38]  R. Melko,et al.  Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions , 2016, Physical Review X.

[39]  Inelastic cross sections and rate coefficients for collisions between CO and H2 , 2017, 1701.05213.

[40]  R. Krems Cold controlled chemistry. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.