Using value analysis to support knowledge transfer in the multi-project setting

This paper investigates how formalized methodologies can effectively support the implementation of knowledge transfer practices in the multi-project setting. We propose a knowledge collection and transfer model grounded on the Value Analysis technique, empirically developed and validated through an action research in the shipbuilding industry. The proposed model facilitates decision making across multiple projects in the cruise ship design by stimulating the reuse of the available knowledge base and the exploitation of information needed to identify design solutions to solve the trade-off between functional requirements and available resources.

[1]  R. Westbrook.  Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[2]  Mian M. Ajmal,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Project-Based Organizations: An Organizational Culture Perspective , 2008 .

[3]  Georg Disterer,et al.  Management of project knowledge and experiences , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  Programme management: organising project-based change , 1997 .

[5]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Ground handling services at European hub airports: Development of a performance measurement system for benchmarking , 2009 .

[6]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Mapping knowledge management and organizational learning in support of organizational memory , 2009 .

[7]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  The Application of Action Learning and Action Research in Collaborative Improvement within the Extended Manufacturing Enterprise , 2005 .

[8]  Mei-yung Leung,et al.  Developing a soft value management model , 2002 .

[9]  C. Eden,et al.  Action Research for Management Research , 1996 .

[10]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Using Group Decision Support System to Support Value Management Workshops , 2008 .

[11]  Fereidoun Ghasemzadeh,et al.  An integrated framework for project portfolio selection , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[13]  Reiner,et al.  Research methodologies in supply chain management , 2005 .

[14]  Morten Levin.  Action research and the research community , 2003 .

[15]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis , 2004 .

[16]  Naomi J. Brookes,et al.  Social processes, patterns and practices and project knowledge management: A theoretical framework and an empirical investigation , 2006 .

[17]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Multiple project management: a modern competitive necessity , 2005 .

[18]  H. Agndal,et al.  Supply chain decision-making supported by an open books policy , 2008 .

[19]  Paulo Carlos Kaminski,et al.  Product development process with focus on value engineering and target-costing: A case study in an automotive company , 2007 .

[20]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms , 2001 .

[21]  Perttu Dietrich,et al.  Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects ¿ Reflections from empirical study , 2005 .

[22]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Strategy, structure and performance in product development: Observations from the auto industry☆ , 1992 .

[23]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[24]  Jonas Roth,et al.  Enabling knowledge creation: learning from an R&D organization , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  I. Nonaka.  The knowledge creating company". Harvard Business Review : . , 1991 .

[26]  Mariano Corso,et al.  A multi-project management framework for new product development , 1994 .

[27]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[28]  John H Payne,et al.  Management of multiple simultaneous projects: a state-of-the-art review , 1995 .

[29]  A. P Van Der Merwe,et al.  Multi-project management—organizational structure and control , 1997 .

[30]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .

[31]  J. Jerry Kaufman.  The Power of FAST in Value Management , 1997 .

[32]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[33]  Julien Pollack,et al.  The changing paradigms of project management , 2007 .

[34]  Robin L. Wakefield.  Identifying knowledge agents in a KM strategy: the use of the structural influence index , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Jung-Soo Oh,et al.  An automated welding operation planning system for block assembly in shipbuilding , 1999 .

[36]  Peter J. Sher,et al.  Information Technology as a Facilitator of Enhancing Dynamic Capability through Knowledge Management , 2020 .

[37]  Jamie Meil,et al.  A life cycle environmental and economic assessment of optimum value engineering in houses , 2006 .

[38]  Swee C. Goh,et al.  Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Transferring R&D Knowledge : the Key Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer Success , 2003 .

[41]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[42]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Programme management and its information systems requirements , 1992 .

[43]  Shu Zhang,et al.  Crane scheduling in a shipbuilding environment , 2010 .

[44]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[45]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[46]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[47]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[48]  Nigel Caldwell,et al.  Sharing Sensitive Information in Supply Relationships:: The Flaws in One-way Open-book Negotiation and the Need for Transparency , 2005 .

[49]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[50]  S. Ottosson.  Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management , 2003 .

[51]  Khaleel Malik,et al.  Aiding the technology manager: a conceptual model for intra-firm technology transfer , 2002 .

[52]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Mats Engwall,et al.  The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management? , 2003 .