Validation de la version française de l'échelle de réflexivité en groupe de Carter et West, 1998

Resume Plusieurs etudes ont montre que la reflexivite — le niveau de discussion d'un groupe sur ses objectifs, strategies et processus et leurs adaptations aux changements — est positivement liee a la performance en groupe. Deux etudes, comprenant 80 groupes (320 personnes), ont ete realisees pour valider la version francaise de l'echelle de reflexivite. Dans l'etude 1, l'analyse factorielle exploratoire revele trois facteurs confirmant en partie la structure a deux facteurs ( reflexivite tâche et reflexivite sociale ) attendue et trouvee dans l'etude originelle de Carter et West, 1998. Deux items du facteur de reflexivite tâche forment un troisieme facteur nomme reflexivite strategique . L'analyse factorielle confirmatoire dans l'etude 2 confirme cette structure. La validite concourante est etablie par les correlations entre reflexivite et performance en groupe. On constate que les reflexivites tâche, sociale et strategique ont des impacts differents sur la performance. La version francaise de l'echelle de reflexivite a une bonne consistance interne. Elle est adequate pour evaluer le niveau de reflexivite d'un groupe.

[1]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[2]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Diversity and team outcomes: the moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity , 2003 .

[3]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. , 1998 .

[4]  D. Organ.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[5]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[7]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[8]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[9]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[10]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams , 2000 .

[11]  L. Resnick,et al.  Social foundations of cognition. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness , 1976 .

[13]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[14]  Michael A. West,et al.  Team-based working::a practical guide to organizational transformation , 2003 .

[15]  J. Gevers,et al.  Time pressure, potency, and progress in project groups , 2001 .

[16]  Jonathan J. Cadiz,et al.  Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies , 1998, CSCW '98.

[17]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[18]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[19]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[20]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[21]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  The use and effectiveness of modern manufacturingpractices: A survey of UK industry , 1999 .

[23]  F. Tschan,et al.  Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models , 2007 .

[24]  Carsten K. W. De Dreu,et al.  Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity , 2002 .

[25]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[26]  N. Semmer,et al.  Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: the role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[27]  T. Beehr.  Social support as a form of treatment , 1995 .

[28]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China , 2003 .

[29]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[30]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[31]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[32]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[33]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[34]  Norbert K. Semmer,et al.  Task Adaptive Behavior and Performance in Groups , 2000 .

[35]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China , 2004 .

[36]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production Teams , 1998 .

[37]  M. West.  Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration , 1996 .

[38]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[39]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .