Similar binding sites and different partners: implications to shared proteins in cellular pathways.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Itay Mayrose,et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[2] R. Nussinov,et al. Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[3] D. Barrell,et al. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) project: implementation of GO in SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL, and InterPro. , 2003, Genome research.
[4] A. D. de Vos,et al. Hematopoietic receptor complexes. , 1996, Annual review of biochemistry.
[5] Andrej Sali,et al. Localization of protein‐binding sites within families of proteins , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[6] H. Wolfson,et al. Protein-protein interfaces: architectures and interactions in protein-protein interfaces and in protein cores. Their similarities and differences. , 1996, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.
[7] H. Wolfson,et al. A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[8] Gabriele Ausiello,et al. MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[9] S. Vajda,et al. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[10] Gary D. Bader,et al. BIND-a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways , 2000, Bioinform..
[11] Ozlem Keskin,et al. Protein Interactions and Fluctuations in a Proteomic Network using an Elastic Network Model , 2005, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[12] A. E. Hirsh,et al. Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.
[13] Dinakar M Salunke,et al. Differential epitope positioning within the germline antibody paratope enhances promiscuity in the primary immune response. , 2006, Immunity.
[14] Peer Bork,et al. Shared components of protein complexes--versatile building blocks or biochemical artefacts? , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[15] O. Lichtarge,et al. Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[16] R. Jernigan,et al. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[17] R. Nussinov,et al. Hot regions in protein--protein interactions: the organization and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] Ozlem Keskin,et al. PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[19] Eugene V Koonin,et al. No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[20] O. Schueler‐Furman,et al. Progress in Modeling of Protein Structures and Interactions , 2005, Science.
[21] Ioannis Xenarios,et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..
[22] R. Nussinov,et al. Protein–protein interactions: organization, cooperativity and mapping in a bottom-up Systems Biology approach , 2005, Physical biology.
[23] P. Bork,et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.
[24] B. Cunningham,et al. Rational design of receptor-specific variants of human growth hormone. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] R. Mariuzza. Multiple paths to multispecificity. , 2006, Immunity.
[26] Jie Liang,et al. Protein-protein interactions: hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: implications for docking. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] Michael Schroeder,et al. Equivalent binding sites reveal convergently evolved interaction motifs , 2006, Bioinform..
[28] Samara L. Reck-Peterson,et al. Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.
[29] P. Bork,et al. Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast , 2004, Science.
[30] Ozlem Keskin,et al. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces , 2005, Bioinform..
[31] Thomas E Wales,et al. Conserved thermodynamic contributions of backbone hydrogen bonds in a protein fold. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] O. Lichtarge,et al. Character and evolution of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Physical biology.
[33] A. Elofsson,et al. What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae? , 2006, Genome Biology.
[34] W. Kabsch,et al. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.
[35] T. Hughes,et al. High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[36] Gail J. Bartlett,et al. Using a library of structural templates to recognise catalytic sites and explore their evolution in homologous families. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[37] T. Maniatis,et al. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines , 2002, Nature.
[38] J. Thompson,et al. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.
[39] W. Delano,et al. Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. , 2000, Science.
[40] R. Jernigan,et al. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[41] A G Murzin,et al. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[42] H. Wolfson,et al. Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] S. Henikoff,et al. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] O. Lichtarge,et al. Evolutionary and structural feedback on selection of sequences for comparative analysis of proteins , 2006, Proteins.
[45] J M Thornton,et al. Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[46] R. Russell,et al. The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[47] A. Grigoriev. On the number of protein-protein interactions in the yeast proteome. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[48] Z. Weng,et al. Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[49] Dorothy Beckett,et al. Functional switches in transcription regulation; molecular mimicry and plasticity in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Biochemistry.
[50] Ruth Nussinov,et al. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures , 2004, Proteins.
[51] C. Adami,et al. Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein–protein interactions data sets , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[52] Daniel R. Caffrey,et al. Are protein–protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[53] Lan V. Zhang,et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.