Impact of Different Trajectory Option Set Participation Levels within an Air Traffic Management Collaborative Trajectory Option Program

This paper presents the methodology and results of a Human-In-The-Loop (HITL) simulation study conducted in the Airspace Operations Laboratory at NASA Ames Research Center. This study is a part of NASA’s ongoing research into developing an Integrated Demand Management (IDM) concept, whose aim is to improve traffic flow management (TFM) by coordinating the FAA’s strategic Traffic Flow Management System (TFMS) with its more tactical Time-Based Flow Management (TBFM) system. The purpose of TFM is to regulate air traffic demand so that it is delivered efficiently through constrained airspace resources without exceeding their capacity limits. The IDM concept leverages a new TFMS capability called the Collaborative Trajectory Options Program (CTOP) to strategically precondition traffic demand flowing into a TBFM-managed arrival environment, where TBFM is responsible for managing traffic tactically by generating precise arrival schedules. Unlike other TFM tools, CTOP gives flight operators the option of submitting a set of user-preferred alternative trajectories for each flight. CTOP can then use these trajectory option sets (or TOSs) to find user-preferred alternative routes to reduce demand on an overloaded resource. CTOP’s effectiveness in redistributing demand is limited, however, by the availability of flights with alternative routes. The research presented in this paper focuses on evaluating the impact on TFM operations by varying the percentage of flights that submit a multiple-option TOS (‘TOS participation levels’). Results show the impact on overall system performance and on the rerouted flights themselves. The simulation used a Newark (EWR) airport arrival scenario, with en route weather affecting traffic inbound from the west. The task was to control three arrival flows (north, west, and south) to meet their individual capacity constraints while simultaneously ensuring efficient utilization of the capacity at the destination airport. A large, permeable convective weather cell located southeast of Chicago severely reduced the capacity of the west flow. The study evaluated the impact of five different TOS participation levels on CTOP’s ability to re-allocate traffic from the west and improve TFM performance in terms of delay assignment and traffic delivery rate to the airport. Overall, the results showed that increasing TOS submissions allowed the overall system delays to be reduced and fairly distributed among the three arrival flows, at the same time achieving the airport throughput rate. Moreover, it was found that aircraft who submitted a TOS saw a greater reduction in delay, even when they were assigned longer routes. This was particularly true when fewer aircraft submitted a TOS. The results confirm that the CTOP operations

[1]  Richard DeLaura,et al.  Trajectory Clustering and Classification for Characterization of Air Traffic Flows , 2016 .

[2]  Michelle M. Eshow,et al.  Architecture and capabilities of a data warehouse for ATM research , 2014, 2014 IEEE/AIAA 33rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[3]  Mark Hansen,et al.  A Framework for Assessment of Collaborative Enroute Resource Allocation Strategies , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas Prevot,et al.  Human-In-the-Loop Evaluation of NextGen Concepts in the Airspace Operations Laboratory , 2010 .

[5]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Analyzing Double Delays at Newark Liberty International Airport , 2016 .

[6]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Integrated Demand Management: Coordinating Strategic and Tactical Flow Scheduling Operations , 2016 .

[7]  James C. Jones,et al.  Predicting Airport Capacity in the Presence of Winds , 2017 .

[8]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Multiple Flow Constrained Area Capacity Setting Methods for Collaborative Trajectory Options Program , 2018, 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[9]  A. Kim A Framework for the Assessment of Collaborative Enroute Resource Allocation Strategies , 2010 .

[10]  Kenneth D. Mease,et al.  Automated Route Clustering for Air Traffic Modeling , 2017 .

[11]  Pierrick Burgain,et al.  Concept for User-Preferred Traffic Flow Management Merging Two Flight Prioritization Concepts , 2012 .

[12]  Paul U. Lee,et al.  Required time of arrival as a control mechanism to mitigate uncertainty in arrival traffic demand management , 2016, 2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[13]  Nancy Smith,et al.  Integrated Demand Management (IDM) - Minimizing Unanticipated Excessive Departure Delay while Ensuring Fairness from a Traffic Management Initiative , 2017 .