CAPACITY-DEMAND INDEX RELATIONSHIPS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN

Seismic design procedures in current building provisions are based on linear and nonlinear static approaches that use capacity-demand index relationships such as the relationship between the lateral strength and the maximum lateral displacement. Previous research on the development of these relationships is based on linear-elastic ground motion acceleration response spectra, whereas the current design procedures are based on “smooth” design response spectra. For the design procedures to be consistent, new capacity-demand index relationships are proposed based on smooth design response spectra from existing design provisions. It is shown that, for survival-level, soft-soil, and near-field ground motion records, the capacity-demand index relationships developed using linearelastic ground motion response spectra are significantly different than those developed using smooth design spectra and can lead to unconservative designs.

[1]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN BASED ON STRENGTH AND DUCTILITY DEMANDS , 1992 .

[2]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Procedures and Criteria for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1975 .

[3]  Fawzi E. Elghadamsi,et al.  Inelastic earthquake spectra , 1987 .

[4]  Rafael Riddell,et al.  Statistical analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes , 1979 .

[5]  Jogeshwar P. Singh.  Earthquake Ground Motions: Implications for Designing Structures and Reconciling Structural Damage , 1985 .

[6]  Kazuhiko Kasai,et al.  Passive Control Systems for Seismic Damage Mitigation , 1998 .

[7]  B. Borzi,et al.  Refined force reduction factors for seismic design , 2000 .

[8]  Kenneth T. Farrow,et al.  Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics , 2003 .

[9]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions , 1999 .

[10]  T. Igusa,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering by Anil K. Chopra , 1996 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[12]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[13]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes , 1999 .

[14]  Nicos Makris,et al.  RIGIDITY–PLASTICITY–VISCOSITY: CAN ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS PROTECT BASE‐ISOLATED STRUCTURES FROM NEAR‐SOURCE GROUND MOTIONS? , 1997 .

[15]  G. MacRae,et al.  POST‐EARTHQUAKE RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENTS OF BILINEAR OSCILLATORS , 1997 .

[16]  Juan Martinez-Rueda.  Scaling Procedure for Natural Accelerograms Based on a System of Spectrum Intensity Scales , 1998 .

[17]  Chia-Ming Uang.  A Balanced Seismic Steel Design Procedure for Strength and Ductility Requirements , 1995 .

[18]  H Krawinkler,et al.  NEW TRENDS IN SEISMIC DESIGN METHODOLOGY , 1995 .

[19]  R. Goel,et al.  Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum , 1999 .

[20]  Yaomin Fu,et al.  Simplified seismic code design procedure for friction-damped steel frames , 1999 .

[21]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[22]  R. P. Kennedy,et al.  Engineering characterization of ground motion. Task I. Effects of characteristics of free-field motion on structural response , 1984 .

[23]  Farzad Naeim.  On Seismic Design Implications of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake Records , 1995 .

[24]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Scaling Methods for Earthquake Response Spectra , 1984 .

[25]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Seismic damage assessment based on different hysteretic rules , 1990 .

[26]  Nelson Lam,et al.  The ductility reduction factor in the seismic design of buildings , 1998 .

[27]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement , 1994 .

[28]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications , 1988 .

[29]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations , 2019, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes.

[30]  Gregory A. MacRae,et al.  Residual Displacement Response Spectrum , 1998 .

[31]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral‐system structures with flexible diaphragms , 2001 .

[32]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[33]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Site-Dependent Strength-Reduction Factors , 1993 .

[34]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Near-Source Ground Motion and its Effects on Flexible Buildings , 1995 .

[35]  S. Sarma,et al.  An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95 , 1987 .

[36]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[37]  A. Arias.  A measure of earthquake intensity , 1970 .