Collaborative information seeking in student group projects

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the collaborative information seeking (CIS) behaviors of students conducting authentic group work projects, and the features of a collaborative search system that are most useful to these students. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory study was conducted with 41 participants in ten groups working on an in class, for-credit group project assignment utilizing a collaborative search system. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered on the everyday search practices of students over the course of the group project, along with quality scores for the sources found. Findings Results showed that student behavior during their CIS related to the quality of their search outcomes, as the effective and efficient searchers found better quality sources. Students’ pre-task attitudes and experiences toward group work also relate to the quality of their search outcomes. Student feedback demonstrated the importance of making collaborative search tools convenient, lightweight, and easy to use. Practical implications These findings may be useful to researchers designing and studying the effectiveness of collaborative search tools, and to instructors planning to incorporate group projects into their classes. Originality/value In this paper, the authors document the authentic behaviors and attitudes of students conducting group projects in an classroom setting, and offer specific recommendations for developers of collaborative search systems. These findings provide greater context for CIS research into the collaborative search behaviors of students conducting group work projects.

[1]  G. Marchionini,et al.  Awareness in collaborative information seeking , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Dan Morris,et al.  ClassSearch: facilitating the development of web search skills through social learning , 2011, CHI.

[3]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Two ' s company, but three ' s no crowd: Evaluating exploratory web search for individuals and teams , 2015, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Searcher actions and strategies in asynchronous collaborative search , 2013, ASIST.

[5]  M. Gross,et al.  Attaining information literacy: An investigation of the relationship between skill level, self-estimates of skill, and library anxiety , 2007 .

[6]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Evaluating the synergic effect of collaboration in information seeking , 2011, SIGIR.

[7]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Collaborative information seeking , 2014, The Information Retrieval Series.

[8]  Jette Hyldegård,et al.  Beyond the search process - Exploring group members' information behavior in context , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Examining Group Work: Implications for the Digital Library as Sharium , 2010, ECDL.

[10]  Marti A. Hearst What's Missing from Collaborative Search? , 2014, Computer.

[11]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Collaborative search revisited , 2013, CSCW.

[12]  Gene Golovchinsky,et al.  Designing for Collaboration in Information Seeking , 2011 .

[13]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Collaborative web search in context: a study of tool use in everyday tasks , 2014, CSCW.

[14]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Coagmento: A system for supporting collaborative information seeking , 2011, ASIST.

[15]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Practicing Critical Evaluation of Online Sources Improves Student Search Behavior , 2016 .

[16]  Roberto I. González-Ibáñez,et al.  Let's search together, but not too close! An analysis of communication and performance in collaborative information seeking , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Jonathan Foster,et al.  Collaborative information seeking and retrieval , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Working on Understanding During Collaborative Online Reading , 2012 .

[19]  Lewis A. Bizo,et al.  The educational impact of team-skills training: preparing students to work in groups. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[20]  Mary O'Farrell,et al.  Student information behaviours during group projects: A study of LIS students in University College Dublin, Ireland , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[21]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Toward Collaborative Information Seeking (CIS) , 2009, JCDL 2008.

[23]  Shuguang Han,et al.  An investigation of the query behavior in task-based collaborative exploratory Web search , 2013, ASIST.

[24]  A. M. Pejtersen,et al.  Information seeking and sharing in design teams , 2003, GROUP.

[25]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search , 2009, CHI.

[26]  Minna Lakkala,et al.  Teachers' pedagogical designs for technology-supported collective inquiry: A national case study , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment , 2011, CHI.

[28]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Algorithmic mediation for collaborative exploratory search , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[30]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  An elaborated model of social search , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  Students' engagement in collaborative knowledge construction in group assignments for information literacy , 2013, Inf. Res..

[32]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A survey of collaborative web search practices , 2008, CHI.

[33]  Karen Markey,et al.  Playing Games to Improve the Quality of the Sources Students Cite in their Papers , 2012 .

[34]  Cary J. Roseth,et al.  Cooperative learning in middle schools: interrelationship of relationships and achievement , 2010 .

[35]  Jean S. Caspers,et al.  What Do Freshmen Really Know about Research? Assess before You Teach , 2005 .

[36]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Tools-at-hand and learning in multi-session, collaborative search , 2010, CHI.