Research Literature and Standards Sets Support for Quality Matters Review Standards

The purpose of this document is to provide supporting references from the distance education literature and among commonly accepted standards for the review standards used in the Quality Matters (QM) rubric and course review process. Most of the references in this compilation are based on empirical studies; however, a number of conceptual studies by recognized distance educators are included. (See Appendix 1 for a complete list of references.) In many cases the research support is relatively indirect. While the QM rubric focuses primarily on the quality of course design, much of the current research focuses on course delivery rather than course design.

[1]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[2]  Andrew R. Brown,et al.  Elements of Effective e-Learning Design , 2005 .

[3]  Philippe Trigano,et al.  Toward a Web based Environment for Evaluation and Design of Pedagogical Hypermedia , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  Marc D Miller,et al.  Predictors of Engagement and Participation in an On-Line Course , 2003 .

[5]  T. Duffy,et al.  LTTS: A course management system for online inquiry learning , 2005 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[7]  Alistair Inglis,et al.  Quality Improvement, Quality Assurance, and Benchmarking: Comparing two frameworks for managing quality processes in open and distance learning , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Twining,et al.  Assessing activity-based learning for a networked course , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  M. D. Roblyer,et al.  How Interactive are YOUR Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning , 2000 .

[10]  George Nakos,et al.  Students’ Perceptions of On-line Courses: An Exploratory Study , 2002 .

[11]  Jim Rogers,et al.  Communities of Practice: A framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  James Belanich,et al.  A Question-Collaboration Approach to Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[13]  Farhad Saba,et al.  Critical Issues in Distance Education: A report from the United States , 2005 .

[14]  Tim Hand,et al.  Enhancing Quality in Online Learning: Scaffolding Planning and Design Through Proactive Evaluation , 2002 .

[15]  Mingming Jiang,et al.  A Study of Factors Influencing Students’ Perceived Learning in a Web-Based Course Environment , 2000 .

[16]  Allan Jeong The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online , 2003 .

[17]  Linda Schwartz Using Internet Audio to Enhance Online Accessibility , 2004 .

[18]  P. Shea,et al.  Faculty Development, Student Satisfaction and Reported Learning in the SUNY Learning Network , 2004 .

[19]  Shujen L. Chang,et al.  What Types of Online Facilitation Do Students Need , 2001 .

[20]  Monica Landoni,et al.  A Usability Study for Promoting eContent in Higher Education , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Curtis D. Edmonds,et al.  Providing Access to Students With Disabilities in Online Distance Education: Legal and Technical Concerns for Higher Education , 2004 .

[22]  John Wood,et al.  A rocky journey toward effective assessment of visualization modules for learning enhancement in Engineering Mechanics , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Franziska Trede,et al.  Facilitating online learning: A descriptive study , 2001 .

[24]  Karen Swan,et al.  Measures of Learning Effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network , 2001 .

[25]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  The importance of structuring information and resources within shared workspaces during collaborative design learning , 2005 .

[26]  T. Anderson Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction , 2003 .

[27]  K. Shattuck Glimpses of the Global Coral Gardens: Insights of International Adult Learners on the Interactions of Cultures in Online Distance Education , 2005 .

[28]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[29]  Yusra Laila Visser,et al.  Perceived and Actual Student Support Needs in Distance Education , 2000 .

[30]  A. Steckler,et al.  Gagne's and Laurillard's Models of Instruction Applied to Distance Education: A theoretically driven evaluation of an online curriculum in public health , 2002 .

[31]  Namin Shin Beyond interaction: Transactional presence and distance learning , 2001 .

[32]  Dianne Conrad,et al.  Engagement, Excitement, Anxiety, and Fear: Learners' Experiences of Starting an Online Course , 2002 .

[33]  Ronald A. Phipps,et al.  Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. , 2000 .

[34]  Howard Eisner,et al.  Information Age , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[35]  Robert J. Seidel,et al.  Knowledge retention as a latent outcome measure in distance learning , 2001 .

[36]  Tiffany A. Koszalka,et al.  Designing online courses: A taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in course management systems (CMS) in distance education , 2004 .

[37]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Learner Support Services for Online Students: Scaffolding for Success. , 2003 .

[38]  Karen Swan,et al.  Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning , 2000, WebNet.

[39]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Transcript Analysis of Computer-Mediated Conferences as a Tool for Testing Constructivist and Social-Constructivist Learning Theories. , 1998 .

[40]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[41]  Neal Strudler,et al.  Development and Validation of an Instrument for Student Evaluation of the Quality of Web-Based Instruction , 2004 .

[42]  Davey Yeung,et al.  Toward an Effective Quality Assurance Model of Web-Based Learning: The Perspective of Academic Staff , 2002 .

[43]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  University Instructor Perceptions of the Use of Asynchronous Text-Based Discussion in Distance Courses , 2002 .

[44]  Yuliang Liu,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Distance Education. , 1999 .

[45]  Muhammad K. Betz Distance Education : A Systems View , 2005 .

[46]  Namin Shin Beyond Interaction: The relational construct of 'Transactional Presence' , 2002 .

[47]  Shelley Kinash,et al.  A Review of 2000-2003 Literature at the Intersection of Online Learning and Disability , 2004 .

[48]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[49]  Stephen Brookfield,et al.  Assessing Critical Thinking , 1997 .

[50]  Senom T. Yalcin,et al.  Online Learning: Patterns of Engagement and Interaction among In-Service teachers , 2003 .

[51]  Patrick J. Fahy,et al.  Investigating Triggers in CMC Text Transcripts , 2003 .

[52]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .

[53]  Rod Sims,et al.  Promises of Interactivity: Aligning Learner Perceptions and Expectations With Strategies for Flexible and Online Learning , 2003 .

[54]  Charlotte L. Neuhauser Learning Style and Effectiveness of Online and Face-to-Face Instruction , 2002 .

[55]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Student and Teacher Perceptions of Interaction in Online Computer-Mediated Communication , 1999 .

[56]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[57]  Russell K Baker,et al.  A Framework for Design and Evaluation of Internet-Based Distance Learning CoursesPhase One - Framework Justification, Design and Evaluation , 2003 .

[58]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[59]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Interactive Multimedia-Based E-Learning: A Study of Effectiveness , 2005 .

[60]  V. A. Thurmond,et al.  Evaluation of Student Satisfaction: Determining the Impact of a Web-Based Environment by Controlling for Student Characteristics , 2002 .

[61]  Douglas F. Johnson A Planning and Assessment Model for Developing Effective CMS Support. , 2004 .

[62]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[63]  Kay Perrin,et al.  The Reality of Designing and Implementing an Internet-based Course , 2000 .

[64]  Hakan Tüzün,et al.  Guidelines for Converting Existing Courses into Web-Based Format. , 2001 .

[65]  Robert Frank Mager,et al.  Preparing Instructional Objectives , 1962 .

[66]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[67]  Lori Weir Raising the Awareness of Online Accessibility: The Importance of Developing and Investing in Online Course Materials that Enrich the Classroom Experience for Special-Needs Students , 2005 .

[68]  Patricia Deubel,et al.  Learning from Reflections - Issues in Building Quality Online Courses , 2003 .

[69]  Susan May,et al.  Collaborative learning: More is not necessarily better , 1993 .

[70]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Guidelines for the Development of Computer-based Instruction Modules for Science and Engineering , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[71]  M. D. Roblyer,et al.  Design and Use of a Rubric to Assess and Encourage Interactive Qualities in Distance Courses , 2003 .

[72]  Barbara Ann Lewis Learning effectiveness: Efficacy of quizzes vs. discussions in on-line learning , 2002 .

[73]  Brent Muirhead Practical Strategies for Teaching Computer-Mediated Classes , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[74]  H. Spallek,et al.  Distance education for dentists: Improving the quality of online instruction , 2000 .

[75]  Lee R. Alley,et al.  The Ten Keys to Quality Assurance and Assessment in Online Learning , 2001 .

[76]  Brent Muirhead,et al.  Enhancing Social Interaction in Computer-Mediated Distance Education , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[77]  Karen Ragoonaden,et al.  Collaborative Learning via the Internet , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[78]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  Role of Contracts in Enhancing Community Building in Web Courses , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..