High Agreement between Barrett Universal II Calculations with and without Utilization of Optional Biometry Parameters

Purpose: To examine the contribution of anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements to intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. Methods: Measurements taken with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) swept-source biometry of 501 right eyes of 501 consecutive patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery between January 2019 and March 2020 were reviewed. IOL power was calculated using the BUII formula, first through the inclusion of all measured variables and then by using partial biometry data. For each calculation method, the IOL power targeting emmetropia was recorded and compared for the whole cohort and stratified by axial length (AL) of the measured eye. Results: The mean IOL power calculated for the entire cohort using all available parameters was 19.50 ± 5.11 diopters (D). When comparing it to the results obtained by partial biometry data, the mean absolute difference ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 D; p < 0.001. The optional variables (ACD, LT, WTW) had the least effect in long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm; mean absolute difference ranging from 0.02 to 0.07 D; p < 0.001), while the greatest effect in short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm; mean absolute difference from 0.10 to 0.21 D; p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with a mean absolute IOL dioptric power difference more than 0.25 D was the highest (32.0%) among the short AL group when using AL and keratometry values only. Conclusions: Using partial biometry data, the BUII formula in small eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm) resulted in a clinically significant difference in the calculated IOL power compared to the full biometry data. In contrast, the contribution of the optional parameters to the calculated IOL power was of little clinical importance in eyes with AL longer than 22 mm.

[1]  M. Farid,et al.  Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula , 2019, Journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  A. Turnbull,et al.  Using the first-eye prediction error in cataract surgery to refine the refractive outcome of the second eye. , 2019, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Jack X. Kane,et al.  Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection , 2019, BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Moshirfar,et al.  Biometry in cataract surgery: a review of the current literature , 2019, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[5]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens. , 2018, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  M. Lawless,et al.  Comparison of Hill‐radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery , 2018, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Holladay,et al.  Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[8]  E. Assia,et al.  Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: Comparison between various formulas. , 2017, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  N. Sharma,et al.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2017, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  Jack X. Kane,et al.  Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  D. Cooke,et al.  Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Carolyn E. Kloek,et al.  Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Sheard Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery , 2014, Eye.

[14]  S. Srivannaboon,et al.  Accuracy of Holladay 2 formula using IOLMaster parameters in the absence of lens thickness value , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Nizam,et al.  Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  T. Hoang‐Xuan,et al.  Assessment of patient satisfaction with outcomes of and ophthalmic care for cataract surgery , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  T. Olsen,et al.  Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. , 2007, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[18]  C. K. Pager,et al.  Expectations and outcomes in cataract surgery: a prospective test of 2 models of satisfaction. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.