Methanogenic community and performance of fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors with reticular polyurethane foam with different pore sizes

This paper reports the effects of the pore size of bed material and bed type on the methanogenic performance and community in fixed and fluidized bed reactors supplied with acetic acid as the sole organic substrate. Fixed-bed reactors with polyurethane foam had a greater biomass retention capacity and better reactor performance than fluidized-bed reactors. A polyurethane pore size of 20 cells/25 mm was better for both beds than a pore size of 13 cells/25 mm. These results indicated that the adjusted pore size is also important for the efficient digestion. The best performance was obtained from the fixed-bed reactor with the 20 cells/25 mm polyurethane foam. Scanning electron microphotographs indicated that the immobilized microbes were primarily composed of coccal, diplococcal-shaped Methanosarcina-like cells, short-rods of Methanosaeta-like cells and long rods of Methanobacterium. Methanosarcina-like cells prevailed in the fixed-bed reactor. The results of 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis indicated that the major immobilized methanogens belonged to the genus Methanosarcina. The results of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis indicated that the cell density of immobilized methanogens in the fixed-bed reactor was higher than that in the fluidized-bed reactor. The better biogas production by the fixed-bed reactor could be explained by the increase in the quantity of methanogens immobilized on the polyurethane foam.

[1]  W. Liu,et al.  Characterization of microbial consortia in a terephthalate-degrading anaerobic granular sludge system. , 2001, Microbiology.

[2]  Y. Yoshida,et al.  Aggregation mechanism in fullerene thin films on several substrates , 1998 .

[3]  H. Harada,et al.  Microbial characteristics of methanogenic sludge consortia developed in thermophilic U ASB reactors , 1993, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  D. Stahl,et al.  Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[6]  Neil Hunter,et al.  Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. , 2002, Microbiology.

[7]  A Ohashi,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. , 1998, Microbiology.

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  A. Knüpfer,et al.  Open-Pore Sintered Glass as a High-Efficiency Support Medium in Bioreactors: New Results and Long-Term Experiences Achieved in High-Rate Anaerobic Digestion , 1990 .

[10]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  The role of filter media in removing suspended and colloidal particles in an anaerobic reactor treating domestic sewage , 2000 .

[11]  V. O’Flaherty,et al.  Methanogenic population structure in a variety of anaerobic bioreactors. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[12]  K. Kida,et al.  Effect of dilution rate on structure of a mesophilic acetate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation. , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[13]  M. Zaiat,et al.  Influence of porosity and composition of supports on the methanogenic biofilm characteristics developed in a fixed bed anaerobic reactor. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  Michel Roustan,et al.  Methane yield as a monitoring parameter for the start-up of anaerobic fixed film reactors. , 2002, Water research.

[15]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Biofiltration--the treatment of fluids by microorganisms immobilized into the filter bedding material: a review. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[16]  K. Horikoshi,et al.  Rapid Detection and Quantification of Members of the Archaeal Community by Quantitative PCR Using Fluorogenic Probes , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[17]  D. Lane.  16S/23S sequencing , 1991 .

[18]  James G. Ferry,et al.  Methanogenesis : Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics , 1994 .

[19]  S. Sawayama,et al.  Effect of ammonium addition on methanogenic community in a fluidized bed anaerobic digestion. , 2004, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[20]  R. Moletta,et al.  Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  B. Ahring,et al.  A comprehensive study into the molecular methodology and molecular biology of methanogenic Archaea. , 2001, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[22]  A. Macario,et al.  Methanogens revealed immunologically in granules from five Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors grown on different substrates , 1990 .

[23]  Chika Tada,et al.  Influence of bed materials on methanogenic characteristics and immobilized microbes in anaerobic digester , 2004 .

[24]  Stephen H. Zinder,et al.  Physiological Ecology of Methanogens , 1993 .

[25]  Daniel B. Oerther,et al.  The oligonucleotide probe database , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[26]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Factors affecting the colonization of non porous and porous packing materials in model upflow methane reactors , 1983, Biotechnology Letters.

[27]  H. Aldrich.  Ultrastructural studies of bacteria in anaerobic biomass digesters , 1993 .

[28]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics , 1991 .

[29]  James R. Cole,et al.  rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..