Impact of long-term cropping of glyphosate-resistant transgenic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] on soil microbiome

The transgenic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] occupies about 80 % of the global area cropped with this legume, the majority comprising the glyphosate-resistant trait (Roundup Ready®, GR or RR). However, concerns about possible impacts of transgenic crops on soil microbial communities are often raised. We investigated soil chemical, physical and microbiological properties, and grain yields in long-term field trials involving conventional and nearly isogenic RR transgenic genotypes. The trials were performed at two locations in Brazil, with different edaphoclimatic conditions. Large differences in physical, chemical and classic microbiological parameters (microbial biomass of C and N, basal respiration), as well as in grain production were observed between the sites. Some phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria), classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Actinomycetales, Solibacteres) and orders (Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Myxococcales, Pseudomonadales), as well as some functional subsystems (clustering-based subsystems, carbohydrates, amino acids and protein metabolism) were, in general, abundant in all treatments. However, bioindicators related to superior soil fertility and physical properties at Londrina were identified, among them a higher ratio of Proteobacteria:Acidobacteria. Regarding the transgene, the metagenomics showed differences in microbial taxonomic and functional abundances, but lower in magnitude than differences observed between the sites. Besides the site-specific differences, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Chlorophyta were higher in the transgenic treatment, as well as sequences related to protein metabolism, cell division and cycle. Although confirming effects of the transgenic trait on soil microbiome, no differences were recorded in grain yields, probably due to the buffering capacity associated with the high taxonomic and functional microbial diversity observed in all treatments.

[1]  Rangel C. Souza,et al.  The complete genome of Burkholderia phenoliruptrix strain BR3459a, a symbiont of Mimosa flocculosa: highlighting the coexistence of symbiotic and pathogenic genes , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[2]  James G. Mitchell,et al.  High Nutrient Transport and Cycling Potential Revealed in the Microbial Metagenome of Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca cinerea) Faeces , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Forest Rohwer,et al.  Viruses in the fecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers , 2010, Nature.

[4]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[5]  P. Brookes,et al.  Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil , 1985 .

[6]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes , 2022 .

[7]  M. Hungria,et al.  Microbial diversity in an Oxisol under no-tillage and conventional tillage in southern Brazil , 2014 .

[8]  Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos,et al.  Soil metagenomics reveals differences under conventional and no-tillage with crop rotation or succession , 2013 .

[9]  M. Liles,et al.  Size Does Matter: Application-driven Approaches for Soil Metagenomics. , 2010, Soil biology & biochemistry.

[10]  J. C. Franchini,et al.  Microbial biomass under various soil- and crop-management systems in short- and long-term experiments in Brazil , 2010 .

[11]  Soil microbial biomass in Amazonian soils: Evaluation of methods and estimates of pool sizes , 1995 .

[12]  Etienne Yergeau,et al.  Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land-use type. , 2012, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[13]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  G. Kaschuk,et al.  Quantifying effects of different agricultural land uses on soil microbial biomass and activity in Brazilian biomes: inferences to improve soil quality , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[15]  P. Brookes,et al.  Microbial biomass and activity at various soil depths in a Brazilian oxisol after two decades of no-tillage and conventional tillage , 2010 .

[16]  Naryttza N. Diaz,et al.  The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Christian L. Lauber,et al.  The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types , 2008 .

[18]  M. F. Guimarães,et al.  Bacterial Diversity Under Different Tillage and Crop Rotation Systems in an Oxisol of Southern Brazil , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel Kumazawa Morais,et al.  Brazilian Microbiome Project: Revealing the Unexplored Microbial Diversity—Challenges and Prospects , 2013, Microbial Ecology.

[20]  Austin G. Davis-Richardson,et al.  Soil pH Determines Microbial Diversity and Composition in the Park Grass Experiment , 2014, Microbial Ecology.

[21]  D. W. Nelson,et al.  Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter , 1983, SSSA Book Series.

[22]  M. F. Guimarães,et al.  Soil structure and its influence on microbial biomass in different soil and crop management systems , 2014 .

[23]  Tracy K. Teal,et al.  Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[24]  M. Hungria,et al.  Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with rhizobia and azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability , 2013, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[25]  J. Swings,et al.  The Family Acetobacteraceae: The Genera Acetobacter, Acidomonas, Asaia, Gluconacetobacter, Gluconobacter, and Kozakia , 2006 .

[26]  J. Germida,et al.  Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[27]  J. C. Franchini,et al.  Comparação entre os métodos de fumigação-extração e fumigação-incubação para determinação do carbono da biomassa microbiana em um Latossolo , 2008 .

[28]  J. C. Franchini,et al.  Nitrogen nutrition of soybean in Brazil: Contributions of biological N2 fixation and N fertilizer to grain yield , 2006 .

[29]  Tom Coenye,et al.  Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches. , 2003, Environmental microbiology.

[30]  Aaron M.Ellison.  PC‐ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data , 1998, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  Amy M. Sheflin,et al.  Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility , 2012, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[32]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  Testing Statistical Significance of Geographic Variation Patterns , 1979 .

[33]  N. L. Innes.  Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2005. ISAAA Briefs No. 34. By C. James. Ithaca, NY, USA: ISAAA (2005), pp. 46, US$50.00. ISBN 1-892456-38-9 , 2006, Experimental Agriculture.

[34]  B. Wang,et al.  Effects of chitinase-transgenic (McChit1) tobacco on the rhizospheric microflora and enzyme activities of the purple soil. , 2018 .

[35]  R. Knight,et al.  Pyrosequencing-Based Assessment of Soil pH as a Predictor of Soil Bacterial Community Structure at the Continental Scale , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  M. Hungria,et al.  Nitrogen Fixation with Soybean: The Perfect Symbiosis? , 2015 .

[37]  J. Caballero-Mellado,et al.  Burkholderia, a Genus Rich in Plant-Associated Nitrogen Fixers with Wide Environmental and Geographic Distribution , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  Walter D. Fisher.  On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity , 1958 .

[39]  Scott T. Bates,et al.  Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  J. C. Franchini,et al.  Soil microbial activity and crop sustainability in a long-term experiment with three soil-tillage and two crop-rotation systems , 2009 .

[41]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  E. Smit,et al.  Diversity and Seasonal Fluctuations of the Dominant Members of the Bacterial Soil Community in a Wheat Field as Determined by Cultivation and Molecular Methods , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[44]  A. Lopes,et al.  Interpretation of Microbial Soil Indicators as a Function of Crop Yield and Organic Carbon , 2013 .

[45]  Jürgen Eck,et al.  Acidobacteria form a coherent but highly diverse group within the bacterial domain: evidence from environmental genomics , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[46]  Andreas Richter,et al.  Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[47]  M. Fernandes,et al.  Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and herbicides on soybean: Field trials monitoring biological nitrogen fixation and yield , 2014 .

[48]  D. Sparks,et al.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods. , 1996 .

[49]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Ascomycota Members Dominate Fungal Communities during Straw Residue Decomposition in Arable Soil , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  Robert G. Beiko,et al.  Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities , 2010, Bioinform..

[51]  Impact of the ahas transgene for herbicides resistance on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean , 2015, Transgenic Research.

[52]  Folker Meyer,et al.  Structure, fluctuation and magnitude of a natural grassland soil metagenome , 2012, The ISME Journal.

[53]  Wen‐Ming Chen,et al.  Legume-nodulating betaproteobacteria: diversity, host range, and future prospects. , 2011, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[54]  David S. Powlson,et al.  The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—V: A method for measuring soil biomass , 1976 .

[55]  Clive James,et al.  ISAAA Briefs brief 41 Global status of Commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2009 , 2009 .

[56]  I. C. Mendes,et al.  A importância do processo de fixação biológica do nitrogênio para a cultura da soja: componente essencial para a competitividade do produto brasileiro. , 2007 .

[57]  A. T. Vasconcelos,et al.  Metagenomic analysis reveals microbial functional redundancies and specificities in a soil under different tillage and crop-management regimes , 2015 .

[58]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  A Census of rRNA Genes and Linked Genomic Sequences within a Soil Metagenomic Library , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[59]  A. O'donnell,et al.  16S rDNA methods in soil microbiology , 1999, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[60]  Thijs J. G. Ettema,et al.  Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes , 2015, Nature.

[61]  G. Kaschuk,et al.  Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. , 2010 .

[62]  Albertine Krohn.  Spot tests in inorganic analysis (Feigel, F.) , 1973 .

[63]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[64]  P. Baldrian,et al.  Functional screening of abundant bacteria from acidic forest soil indicates the metabolic potential of Acidobacteria subdivision 1 for polysaccharide decomposition , 2015, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[65]  C. Berney,et al.  The evolution of early Foraminifera , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  L. Vivaldi,et al.  Carbono da biomassa microbiana em solos de cerrado sob vegetação nativa e sob cultivo: avaliação dos métodos fumigação-incubação e fumigação-extração , 2001 .

[67]  Impact of the ahas transgene and of herbicides associated with the soybean crop on soil microbial communities , 2013, Transgenic Research.

[68]  C. Kuske,et al.  Dryland biological soil crust cyanobacteria show unexpected decreases in abundance under long-term elevated CO2. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[69]  P. Brookes,et al.  AN EXTRACTION METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS C , 1987 .

[70]  M. Fernandes,et al.  Effects of the glyphosate-resistance gene and of herbicides applied to the soybean crop on soil microbial biomass and enzymes , 2014 .

[71]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  The M5nr: a novel non-redundant database containing protein sequences and annotations from multiple sources and associated tools , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[72]  J. P. E. AND-N.  A PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS , 2022 .

[73]  A. Young,et al.  The influence of sampling strategies and spatial variation on the detected soil bacterial communities under three different land-use types. , 2011, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[74]  D. T. LEWIS,et al.  Spot Tests in Organic Analysis , 1961, Nature.

[75]  Forest Rohwer,et al.  Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus? , 2005, Trends in microbiology.