Diffusion of innovations theory applied to global tobacco control treaty ratification.

This study applies diffusion of innovations theory to understand network influences on country ratification of an international health treaty, the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC). From 2003 to 2014 approximately 90% of United Nations member countries ratified the FCTC. We hypothesized that communication between tobacco control advocates on GLOBALink, a 7000-member online communication forum in existence from 1992 to 2012, would be associated with the timing of treaty ratification. We further hypothesized dynamic network influences such that external influence decreased over time, internal influence increased over time, and the role of opinion leader countries varied over time. In addition we develop two concepts: Susceptibility and influence that uncover the micro-level dynamics of network influence. Statistical analyses lend support to the influence of co-subscriptions on GLOBALink providing a conduit for inter-country influences on treaty ratification and some support for the dynamic hypotheses. Analyses of susceptibility and infection indicated particularly influential countries. These results have implications for the study of policy diffusion as well as dynamic models of behavior change.

[1]  Jack L. Walker.  The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[4]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[5]  E. Paradis.  Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R , 2006 .

[6]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Yansong Hu,et al.  Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  Ruth M. Ripley,et al.  Manual for RSiena , 2011 .

[10]  S. Hill,et al.  The ‘diverse, dynamic new world of global tobacco control’? An analysis of participation in the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[11]  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  Why and When "Flawed" Social Network Analyses Still Yield Valid Tests of no Contagion , 2012, Statistics, politics, and policy.

[12]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  The network autocorrelation model using two-mode data: Affiliation exposure and potential bias in the autocorrelation parameter , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Kayo Fujimoto,et al.  Global tobacco control diffusion: the case of the framework convention on tobacco control. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[14]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[15]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[16]  Amy Geller,et al.  Visit the National Academies Press Online and Register For... Frontiers in Massive Data Analysis , 2022 .

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  J. Coleman,et al.  Dimensions of being modern in medical practice. , 1959, Journal of chronic diseases.

[19]  J. Galaskiewicz,et al.  A contingency theory of policy innovation: how different theories explain the ratification of the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol , 2013, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[20]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Douglas J. Myers.  The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  G. Huang,et al.  Power of the process: evaluating the impact of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control negotiations. , 2011, Health policy.

[23]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  P. Hedström.  Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  P. Allison.  Event History Analysis , 1984 .

[26]  E M Rogers,et al.  The Origins and Development of the Diffusion of Innovations Paradigm as an Example of Scientific Growth , 1995, Science communication.

[27]  Peter Hedström,et al.  Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Covadonga Meseguer.  Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order , 2005 .

[29]  A. Pentland,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[30]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[31]  Uta Oberdörster.  Why Ratify? Lessons from Treaty Ratification Campaigns , 2008 .

[32]  D. R. Heise,et al.  Event Structure Models from Ethnographic Data , 1990 .

[33]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[35]  Russell Lyons,et al.  The Spread of Evidence-Poor Medicine via Flawed Social-Network Analysis , 2010, 1007.2876.

[36]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Social Network Analysis with sna , 2008 .

[37]  R. L. Savage.  Diffusion Research Traditions and the Spread of Policy Innovations in a Federal System , 1985 .

[38]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .

[39]  Martina Morris,et al.  A statnet Tutorial. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[40]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  Charlotte C. Greenan,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in dynamic networks , 2015 .

[42]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Social Contagion in New Product Trial and Repeat , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[43]  Herbert Menzel,et al.  INNOVATION, INTEGRATION, AND MARGINALITY: A SURVEY OF PHYSICIANS * , 1960 .

[44]  C. Steglich,et al.  DYNAMIC NETWORKS AND BEHAVIOR: SEPARATING SELECTION FROM INFLUENCE: separating selection from influence , 2010 .

[45]  T. Valente,et al.  Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[46]  J. Drope,et al.  Plain packaging: an opportunity for improved international policy coherence? , 2015, Health promotion international.