Proximity, Candidates, and Presidential Power

We examine the impact of direct presidential elections on legislative party systems. We argue that presidential power (PRESPOW) shapes the effective number of presidential candidates in a way that has a reductive effect on the legislative party system within an intermediary range of PRESPOW. We also argue that this proposition should be tested solely on the population of countries with direct presidential elections. We find that the effect of presidential coattails is less important than has typically been suggested and that we need to think carefully about how to capture variation in PRESPOW when trying to estimate its effect.

[1]  Nils-Christian Bormann,et al.  Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946–2020 , 2005, Electoral Studies.

[2]  HickenAllen,et al.  Electoral Rules and the Size of the Prize: How Political Institutions Shape Presidential Party Systems , 2015 .

[3]  A. Hicken,et al.  Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections , 2013 .

[4]  J. Fortin.  Measuring presidential powers: Some pitfalls of aggregate measurement , 2013 .

[5]  Jasjeet S. Sekhon,et al.  When Natural Experiments Are Neither Natural nor Experiments , 2012, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Heather Stoll.  Presidential Coattails : A Closer Look ∗ , 2011 .

[7]  S. Moestrup.  Semi-Presidentialism in Africa , 2011 .

[8]  M. Shugart,et al.  Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior , 2010 .

[9]  Margit Tavits.  Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests , 2009 .

[10]  O. V. Cranenburgh.  ‘Big Men’ Rule: Presidential Power, Regime Type and Democracy in 30 African Countries , 2008 .

[11]  K. Armingeon,et al.  Institutional change and stability in postcommunist countries, 1990-2002 , 2008 .

[12]  Thad Dunning,et al.  Improving Causal Inference , 2008 .

[13]  Thomas Brambor,et al.  Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses , 2006, Political Analysis.

[14]  Matt Golder.  Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation , 2006 .

[15]  Mathew Sobert Shugart.  Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead , 2005 .

[16]  Shaheen Mozaffar,et al.  Electoral Institutions, Ethnopolitical Cleavages, and Party Systems in Africa's Emerging Democracies , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[17]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country* , 2003 .

[18]  Alan. Siaroff.  Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi‐presidential and parliamentary distinction , 2003 .

[19]  L. Johannsen,et al.  IPA: The Index of Presidential Authority. Explorations into the measurement of impact of a political institution , 2003 .

[20]  Timothy Frye.  Presidents, Parliaments, and Democracy: Insights from the Post‐Communist World , 2002 .

[21]  L. Metcalf.  Measuring Presidential Power , 2000 .

[22]  M. Jones.  Electoral Laws and the Effective Number of Candidates in Presidential Elections , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[23]  Olga Shvetsova.  Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems by Gary W. Cox , 1998 .

[24]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems , 1997 .

[25]  Octavio Amorim Neto,et al.  Electoral institutions,cleavage structures,and the number of parties , 1997 .

[26]  Sergio Fabbrini,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics , 1996 .

[27]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[28]  M. Shugart.  The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Areno Lijphart,et al.  A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945-1990 , 1995 .

[30]  Matthew Soberg Shugart,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Index , 1992 .