The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned

[1]  P. S. Kupalov.  SOME NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF NERVOUS PROCESSES IN THE BRAIN , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[3]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[4]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[5]  B S Kopell,et al.  Long-latency evoked potentials and reaction time. , 1978, Psychophysiology.

[6]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[7]  P. Cooke.  Presidential address 1980. , 1980, The Hospital and health services review.

[8]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Presidential Address: 1980 , 1981 .

[9]  E. Donchin.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Gregory McCarthy,et al.  Chronometric analyses of human information processing , 1983 .

[11]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Walter Ritter,et al.  Tutorials in event related potential research : endogenous components , 1983 .

[13]  I. Fischler,et al.  Brain potentials during sentence verification: Automatic aspects of comprehension , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[14]  John Polich,et al.  Semantic categorization and event-related potentials , 1985, Brain and Language.

[15]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  R. Verleger.  Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  R. Jakobson.  On Language , 1990 .

[18]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[20]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Phonological Processing: Latency Variation of a Negative ERP Component Timelocked to Phonological Mismatch , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[22]  Vicka R. Corey,et al.  On the Language Specificity of the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Is the Syntactic Positive Shift a Member of the P300 Family? , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  On the Brain Response to Syntactic Anomalies: Manipulations of Word Position and Word Class Reveal Individual Differences , 1997, Brain and Language.

[24]  R. Verleger.  On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[25]  J. GohK.  Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology , 1997 .

[26]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse , 1998 .

[28]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Analyzing and Visualizing Single-Trial Event-Related Potentials , 1998, NIPS.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[30]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Madelena Lucinda McClure.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by Japanese sentences , 1999 .

[32]  François Mauguière,et al.  A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  P Hagoort,et al.  Gender Electrified: ERP Evidence on the Syntactic Nature of Gender Processing , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[34]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[35]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? , 1999 .

[36]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[37]  J. Nicol,et al.  On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies. , 1999 .

[38]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  R D Hare,et al.  Semantic and affective processing in psychopaths: an event-related potential (ERP) study. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[40]  R. McCarley,et al.  Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  S Makeig,et al.  Event-related brain response abnormalities in autism: evidence for impaired cerebello-frontal spatial attention networks. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[42]  E. Donchin,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[43]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[45]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[46]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  Brain responses to number sequences with and without active task requirement , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[47]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[48]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiology of normal and pathological language processing , 2003, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[49]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Syntax-related ERP-effects in Dutch. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[50]  A. Friederici,et al.  Why the P600 is not just a P300: the role of the basal ganglia , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[51]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  A Super cial Resemblance Does Not Necessarily Mean You Are Part of the Family : Counterarguments to Coulson , King and Kutas ( 1998 ) in the P 600 / SPS-P 300 Debate , 2004 .

[52]  Christian J Fiebach,et al.  On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[54]  H. Gray,et al.  P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli , 2004 .

[55]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Activation of monkey locus coeruleus neurons varies with difficulty and performance in a target detection task. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets , 2004, PLoS biology.

[57]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[59]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[60]  David A Copland,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by semantic and syntactic anomalies during auditory sentence processing. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[61]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  S. Sara,et al.  Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[63]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[64]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  The earliest EEG signatures of object recognition in a cued-target task are postsensory. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[65]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  J. Townsend,et al.  Auditory semantic networks for words and natural sounds , 2006, Brain Research.

[67]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[68]  C. Woody.  Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[69]  H. Kolk,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences , 2006, Brain Research.

[70]  E. Schröger,et al.  Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event‐related potential study with ringtones , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[71]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study , 2007, Brain Research.

[72]  P. Burkhardt.  The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory , 2007, Neuroreport.

[73]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[74]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Edith Kaan,et al.  Event-Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[76]  G. Battaglia,et al.  Withdrawal from a single exposure to cocaine increases 5-HT2A receptor and G protein function , 2007, Neuroreport.

[77]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[78]  S. Makeig,et al.  Section: Behavioral/systems/cognitive Medial Prefrontal Theta Bursts Precede Rapid Motor Responses during Visual Selective Attention Introduction , 2022 .

[79]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain and Language.

[80]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Speeding Up Syntax: On the Relative Timing and Automaticity of Local Phrase Structure and Morphosyntactic Processing as Reflected in Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  A. Friederici,et al.  The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture , 2008 .

[82]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[83]  S. Small.  The neuroscience of language , 2008, Brain and Language.

[84]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[85]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[86]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[87]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[88]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Comprehending Emotional Meaning in Context , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[89]  Howard Bowman,et al.  Attention Increases the Temporal Precision of Conscious Perception: Verifying the Neural-ST2 Model , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[90]  Tom Eichele,et al.  Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[91]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Limited retinotopic reorganization in age-related macular degeneration , 2010 .

[92]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .

[93]  R. Verleger.  Popper and P300: Can the view ever be falsified that P3 latency is a specific indicator of stimulus evaluation? , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[94]  D. Bishop,et al.  Measurement of mismatch negativity in individuals: A study using single-trial analysis , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[95]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  Luca Citi,et al.  Reaction-time binning: a simple method for increasing the resolving power of ERP averages. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[97]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[98]  C. Saron,et al.  Speech and Span: Working Memory Capacity Impacts the Use of Animacy but Not of World Knowledge during Spoken Sentence Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[99]  Jason Bohan,et al.  Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[100]  H. Barber,et al.  Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions , 2011, Cortex.

[101]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing , 2011, Brain Research.

[102]  A. Friederici.  The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[103]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[104]  Marty G Woldorff,et al.  Differential functional roles of slow-wave and oscillatory-α activity in visual sensory cortex during anticipatory visual-spatial attention. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[105]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[106]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension , 2011, Brain and Language.

[107]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[108]  Aya Meltzer-Asscher,et al.  Electrophysiological responses to argument structure violations in healthy adults and individuals with agrammatic aphasia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[109]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological an Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[110]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Improving standards in brain-behavior correlation analyses , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[111]  Andrea Weber,et al.  When One Person's Mistake Is Another's Standard Usage: The Effect of Foreign Accent on Syntactic Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[112]  S. Sara,et al.  Orienting and Reorienting: The Locus Coeruleus Mediates Cognition through Arousal , 2012, Neuron.

[113]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[114]  Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer,et al.  Language comprehension interrupted: Both language errors and word degradation activate Broca’s area , 2013, Brain and Language.

[115]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[116]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  The Human Brain Processes Syntax in the Absence of Conscious Awareness , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[117]  Anthony J. Ries,et al.  A Novel Method for Single-Trial Classification in the Face of Temporal Variability , 2013, HCI.

[118]  R. Barry,et al.  CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[119]  Phaedra Royle,et al.  ERPs and task effects in the auditory processing of gender agreement andsemantics in French , 2013 .

[120]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[121]  E. Moreno,et al.  Setbacks, pleasant surprises and the simply unexpected: brainwave responses in a language comprehension task. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[122]  R. Barry,et al.  CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P 3 : A failure to replicate , 2016 .

[123]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .