Computational study on aerodynamically coupled piezoelectric harvesters

In this work, the authors present a two-dimensional computational model for predicting the aeroelastic response as well as the output power of vertically arranged harvesters by taking into account all aerodynamic interactions. The piezo-aeroelastic framework consists of the following: (1) an aerodynamic model based on the unsteady vortex-lattice method to compute the aerodynamic forces; (2) a discrete parameter model for each harvester with 3 degrees of freedom (plunge motion, pitch motion, and the voltage generated by the piezoelectric effect); (3) an inter-model connection to exchange information between models at each time step; and (4) a numerical scheme based on the Hamming’s fourth-order predictor–corrector method to integrate all the governing equations in the time domain. The results obtained allow us to infer new insights into the flutter onset as well as the post-critical behavior of harvester arrangements. An interesting finding is that the flutter speed is significantly decreased as the distance between the harvesters is reduced. The results suggest the strong possibility of effective energy extraction at low flow speeds using properly distributed harvester arrangements. However, in post-critical conditions, the output power is significantly enhanced as the free-stream speed is increased.

[1]  Sergio Preidikman,et al.  Time-Domain Simulations of Linear and Nonlinear Aeroelastic Behavior , 2000 .

[2]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  A numerical method for general, unsteady aerodynamics , 1981 .

[3]  Alper Erturk,et al.  Three-Degree-of-Freedom Hybrid Piezoelectric-Inductive Aeroelastic Energy Harvester Exploiting a Control Surface , 2015 .

[4]  Paolo Gaudenzi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a piezoelectric aeroelastic energy harvester based on the limit cycle oscillation phenomenon , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[5]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An experimentally validated bimorph cantilever model for piezoelectric energy harvesting from base excitations , 2009 .

[6]  Robert Krasny,et al.  Computation of vortex sheet roll-up in the Trefftz plane , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Leonie Moench,et al.  Low Speed Aerodynamics , 2016 .

[8]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity , 2002 .

[9]  B. Balachandran,et al.  Flexible flapping systems: computational investigations into fluid-structure interactions , 2011, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[10]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Fluttering energy harvesters in the wind: A review , 2016 .

[11]  Bruno A. Roccia,et al.  Computational Dynamics of Flapping Wings in Hover Flight: A Co-Simulation Strategy , 2017 .

[12]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  The Secondary Bifurcation of an Aeroelastic Airfoil Motion: Effect of High Harmonics , 2004 .

[13]  Jae-Sung Bae,et al.  Aeroelastic characteristics of linear and nonlinear piezo-aeroelastic energy harvester , 2014 .

[14]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  On the energy harvesting potential of piezoaeroelastic systems , 2010 .

[15]  Simon Watkins,et al.  On the visualisation of flow structures downstream of fluttering piezoelectric energy harvesters in a tandem configuration , 2014 .

[16]  Yuting Dai,et al.  A piezoelectric energy harvesting scheme based on stall flutter of airfoil section , 2019, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids.

[17]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Development of an aeroelastic vibration power harvester , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  Stephen Wiggins,et al.  Global Bifurcations and Chaos , 1988 .

[19]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Wake synergies enhance performance in aeroelastic vibration energy harvesting , 2012 .

[20]  Ali Bakhshandeh Rostami,et al.  Renewable energy harvesting by vortex-induced motions: Review and benchmarking of technologies , 2017 .

[21]  Sergio Preidikman,et al.  Modified Unsteady Vortex-Lattice Method to Study Flapping Wings in Hover Flight , 2013 .

[22]  A. Nayfeh,et al.  Applied nonlinear dynamics : analytical, computational, and experimental methods , 1995 .

[23]  S. John,et al.  PROXIMITY EFFECTS OF PIEZOELECTRIC ENERGY HARVESTERS IN FLUID FLOW , 2014 .

[24]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Design of piezoaeroelastic energy harvesters , 2012 .

[25]  N. Gumerov,et al.  Fast Multipole Accelerated Unsteady Vortex Lattice Method Based Computations , 2019, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Olivier Doare,et al.  Piezoelectric coupling in energy-harvesting fluttering flexible plates: linear stability analysis and conversion efficiency , 2011, 1104.3732.

[27]  Alper Erturk,et al.  Enhanced aeroelastic energy harvesting by exploiting combined nonlinearities: theory and experiment , 2011 .

[28]  Bruno A. Roccia,et al.  A Numerical Model to Study the Nonlinear and Unsteady Aerodynamics of Bioinspired Morphing-Wing Concepts , 2015 .

[29]  Daochun Li,et al.  Piezoaeroelastic energy harvesting based on an airfoil with double plunge degrees of freedom: Modeling and numerical analysis , 2017 .

[30]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Self-powered smart blade: helicopter blade energy harvesting , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[31]  Leishman,et al.  Generalized Viscous Vortex Model for Application to Free-Vortex Wake and Aeroacoustic Calculations , 2002 .

[32]  Sergio Preidikman,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Interactions Among Aerodynamics, Structural Dynamics, and Control Systems , 1998 .

[33]  Dean T. Mook,et al.  Computational Aeroelasticity of Flying Robots with Flexible Wings , 2017 .

[34]  Paul L. Rosin A note on the least squares fitting of ellipses , 1993, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[35]  Matthew Bryant,et al.  Modeling and Testing of a Novel Aeroelastic Flutter Energy Harvester , 2011 .

[36]  A. Gourdin,et al.  Applied Numerical Methods , 2004 .