Supervision and Project Performance: A Principal-Agent Approach

This paper extends and applies principal-agent theory to the performance of donor projects. There is variation in the degree of divergence between the interests of the donor (the principal) and the recipient government (the agent). Further, the effort expended on observation of the agent is a control variable. We show that in a wide range of circumstances an implication of principal-agent theory is that the principal should put greater effort into observation the wider is the divergence of interest with the agent. We then test this prediction using data on World Bank project performance. We measure the degree of divergence between donor and recipient interests, as perceived by the donor, through a donor classification system of recipient governments. Consistent with the theory, we find that donor supervision of projects is significantly more effective in improving project performance where interests are widely divergent. However, donors do not put more effort into the supervision of projects in such cases.

[1]  J. Isham,et al.  The Forgotten Rationale for Policy Reform: The Productivity of Investment Projects , 1995 .

[2]  G. Baker Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  B. O'Flaherty OF TIME AND POWER: LEADERSHIP DURATION IN THE MODERN WORLD , 1992 .

[4]  Christopher Kilby Assessing the contribution of donor agencies to aid effectiveness: The impact of World Bank preparation on project outcomes , 2012 .

[5]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  Good Countries or Good Projects? Macro and Micro Correlates of World Bank Project Performance , 2011 .

[6]  C. Kirk Hadaway,et al.  World Christian Encyclopedia , 2013 .

[7]  Chris Papageorgiou,et al.  Investing in public investment: an index of public investment efficiency , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  José Tavares Does foreign aid corrupt , 2003 .

[9]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[10]  Maitreesh Ghatak,et al.  Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents , 2003 .

[11]  J. Svensson,et al.  What Explains the Success or Failure of Structural Adjustment Programs? , 1998 .

[12]  George P. Baker,et al.  Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts , 1993 .

[13]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Civil Liberties, Democracy, and the Performance of Government Projects , 1997 .

[14]  D. Strang,et al.  Of Time and Power: Leadership Duration in the Modern World , 1991 .

[15]  Christopher Kilby,et al.  Supervision and Performance : The Case of World Bank Projects , 2000 .