Social Desirability in Personality Inventories The Nature of the Evaluative Factor

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.

[1]  Martin Bäckström,et al.  Social desirability in personality inventories: Symptoms, diagnosis and prescribed cure , 2013, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  A General Factor of Personality. , 2011 .

[3]  E. Turkheimer,et al.  The General Factor of Personality and Evaluation , 2012 .

[4]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Egoistic and Moralistic Biases in Self-Perception: The Interplay of Self-Deceptive Styles With Basic Traits and Motives , 1998 .

[5]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[6]  S. Paunonen,et al.  Self-Enhancement in Military Leaders: Its Relevance to Officer Selection and Performance , 2011 .

[7]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Descriptive consistency and social desirability in self‐and peer reports , 1989 .

[8]  William Revelle,et al.  The General Factor of Personality: A General Critique. , 2013, Journal of research in personality.

[9]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality , 2008 .

[10]  M. Bäckström,et al.  Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. , 2009 .

[11]  Jack Block,et al.  The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. , 1965 .

[12]  J. Conway,et al.  Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. , 1999 .

[13]  J. Musek.  A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. , 2007 .

[14]  Gerard Saucier,et al.  Orthogonal Markers for Orthogonal Factors: The Case of the Big Five , 2002 .

[15]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  D. Paulhus.  Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[17]  Virginia S Y Kwan,et al.  Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Penelope Lockwood,et al.  The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: the halo-alpha-beta model. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  D. Peabody.  Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. , 1967 .

[20]  M. Ashton,et al.  Honesty-humility, the big five, and the five-factor model. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[21]  J. M. Digman.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Bäckström.  Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability , 2007 .

[23]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[24]  A. L. Edwards.  The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research , 1958 .

[25]  J. Allik,et al.  Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits , 2006 .