Harnessing the Heterogeneity of T Cell Differentiation Fate to Fine-Tune Generation of Effector and Memory T Cells

Recent studies show that naïve T cells bearing identical T cell receptors experience heterogeneous differentiation and clonal expansion processes. The factors controlling this outcome are not well characterized, and their contributions to immune cell dynamics are similarly poorly understood. In this study, we develop a computational model to elaborate mechanisms occurring within and between two important physiological compartments, lymph nodes and blood, to determine how immune cell dynamics are controlled. Our multi-organ (multi-compartment) model integrates cellular and tissue level events and allows us to examine the heterogeneous differentiation of individual precursor cognate naïve T cells to generate both effector and memory T lymphocytes. Using this model, we simulate a hypothetical immune response and reproduce both primary and recall responses to infection. Increased numbers of antigen-bearing dendritic cells (DCs) are predicted to raise production of both effector and memory T cells, and distinct “sweet spots” of peptide-MHC levels on those DCs exist that favor CD4+ or CD8+ T cell differentiation toward either effector or memory cell phenotypes. This has important implications for vaccine development and immunotherapy.

[1]  Susan M. Kaech,et al.  Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: initial antigen encounter triggers a developmental program in naïve cells , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[2]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Opinion-decision making in the immune system: Progressive differentiation and selection of the fittest in the immune response , 2002, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[3]  Emmanuel Beaudoing,et al.  Size Estimate of the αβ TCR Repertoire of Naive Mouse Splenocytes1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[4]  V. Soumelis,et al.  Human inflammatory dendritic cells induce Th17 cell differentiation. , 2013, Immunity.

[5]  A. Casrouge,et al.  A Direct Estimate of the Human αβ T Cell Receptor Diversity , 1999 .

[6]  William S. Lane,et al.  Predominant naturally processed peptides bound to HLA-DR1 are derived from MHC-related molecules and are heterogeneous in size , 1992, Nature.

[7]  D. Kirschner,et al.  A hybrid multi-compartment model of granuloma formation and T cell priming in tuberculosis. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  John T. Chang,et al.  Asymmetric T Lymphocyte Division in the Initiation of Adaptive Immune Responses , 2007, Science.

[9]  M. Fallahi-Sichani,et al.  NF-κB Signaling Dynamics Play a Key Role in Infection Control in Tuberculosis , 2012, Front. Physio..

[10]  Rustom Antia,et al.  The role of models in understanding CD8+ T-cell memory , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[11]  M. Jenkins,et al.  Origins of CD4+ effector and central memory T cells , 2011, Nature Immunology.

[12]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  Two-Photon Imaging of Lymphocyte Motility and Antigen Response in Intact Lymph Node , 2002, Science.

[13]  Joost B. Beltman,et al.  Heterogeneous Differentiation Patterns of Individual CD8+ T Cells , 2013, Science.

[14]  Simeone Marino,et al.  Multiscale Computational Modeling Reveals a Critical Role for TNF-α Receptor 1 Dynamics in Tuberculosis Granuloma Formation , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[16]  A. F. Marée,et al.  Spatial modelling of brief and long interactions between T cells and dendritic cells , 2007, Immunology and cell biology.

[17]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T cell fitness determined by signal strength , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[18]  Philip D. Hodgkin,et al.  A cellular calculus for signal integration by T cells , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[19]  J. Schenkel,et al.  The integration of T cell migration, differentiation and function , 2013, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[20]  Susan M. Kaech,et al.  Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[21]  Rustom Antia,et al.  Estimating the Precursor Frequency of Naive Antigen-specific CD8 T Cells , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  J. Sprent,et al.  T cell memory. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[23]  A. Casrouge,et al.  A direct estimate of the human alphabeta T cell receptor diversity. , 1999, Science.

[24]  C. Mackay,et al.  Homing of naive, memory and effector lymphocytes. , 1993, Current opinion in immunology.

[25]  Louis J. Picker,et al.  Changes in thymic function with age and during the treatment of HIV infection , 1998, Nature.

[26]  A. Woodard,et al.  Extent of T cell receptor ligation can determine the functional differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  R. Steinman,et al.  Dendritic cells and the control of immunity , 1998, Nature.

[28]  S. Henrickson,et al.  T-cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Rob J. De Boer,et al.  Chemotactic Migration of T Cells towards Dendritic Cells Promotes the Detection of Rare Antigens , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Christian Stemberger,et al.  A single naive CD8+ T cell precursor can develop into diverse effector and memory subsets. , 2007, Immunity.

[31]  A. Oxenius,et al.  From crucial to negligible: Functional CD8+ T‐cell responses and their dependence on CD4+ T‐cell help , 2012, European journal of immunology.

[32]  J. Cyster,et al.  Chemokines, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. , 2005, Annual review of immunology.

[33]  L. McGuinness,et al.  A single-cell pedigree analysis of alternative stochastic lymphocyte fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  P. Dunbar,et al.  On-Lattice Simulation of T Cell Motility, Chemotaxis, and Trafficking in the Lymph Node Paracortex , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Reinhold Förster,et al.  HEVs, lymphatics and homeostatic immune cell trafficking in lymph nodes , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[36]  M. Roederer,et al.  CD8 naive T cell counts decrease progressively in HIV-infected adults. , 1995, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[37]  J. Sprent,et al.  T Cell Death and Memory , 2001, Science.

[38]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. , 2000, Science.

[39]  Denise E Kirschner,et al.  Mathematical and computational approaches can complement experimental studies of host-pathogen interactions. , 2009, Cellular microbiology.

[40]  Melinda Fitzgerald,et al.  Immunol. Cell Biol. , 1995 .

[41]  S. Amigorena,et al.  Similar antigen cross-presentation capacity and phagocytic functions in all freshly isolated human lymphoid organ–resident dendritic cells , 2013, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[42]  R. Ahmed,et al.  THE ROLE OF MODELS IN UNDERSTANDING CD8 , 2005 .

[43]  M. Cooper,et al.  Differential activation requirements for virgin and memory T cells. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[44]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  Systems biology approaches for understanding cellular mechanisms of immunity in lymph nodes during infection. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  Matthew A. Williams,et al.  The Magnitude of CD4+ T Cell Recall Responses Is Controlled by the Duration of the Secondary Stimulus1 , 2009, Journal of Immunology.

[46]  S. Granjeaud,et al.  The Strategy of T Cell Antigen-presenting Cell Encounter in Antigen-draining Lymph Nodes Revealed by Imaging of Initial T Cell Activation , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  V. Deneys,et al.  Age-related changes in human blood lymphocyte subpopulations. , 1992, The Journal of pediatrics.

[48]  J. Opferman,et al.  Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. , 1999, Science.

[49]  Joshy Jacob,et al.  Modelling T-cell memory by genetic marking of memory T cells in vivo , 1999, Nature.

[50]  H. Müller-Hermelink,et al.  The Involution of the Ageing Human Thymic Epithelium is Independent of Puberty , 1985, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[51]  R. Germain,et al.  Single Cell Analysis Reveals Regulated Hierarchical T Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling Thresholds and Intraclonal Heterogeneity for Individual Cytokine Responses of CD4+ T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[52]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[53]  Denise Kirschner,et al.  Dynamics of naive and memory CD4+ T lymphocytes in HIV-1 disease progression. , 2002, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[54]  D. Kirschner,et al.  A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[55]  Gib Bogle,et al.  T cell responses in lymph nodes , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[56]  L. Picker,et al.  Lymphocyte Homing and Homeostasis , 1996, Science.

[57]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  A comparison of random vs. chemotaxis-driven contacts of T cells with dendritic cells during repertoire scanning. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  Alan S Perelson,et al.  Quantifying T lymphocyte turnover. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[60]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Different Dynamics of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cell Responses During and After Acute Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Infection 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[61]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.

[62]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Recruitment Times, Proliferation, and Apoptosis Rates during the CD8+ T-Cell Response to Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[63]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Developmental Regulation of Lck Targeting to the CD8 Coreceptor Controls Signaling in Naive and Memory T Cells , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[64]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .

[65]  M. Bevan,et al.  Duration of the initial TCR stimulus controls the magnitude but not functionality of the CD8+ T cell response , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[66]  Thomas Höfer,et al.  Disparate Individual Fates Compose Robust CD8+ T Cell Immunity , 2013, Science.

[67]  Melody A. Swartz,et al.  Dendritic-cell trafficking to lymph nodes through lymphatic vessels , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[68]  David Gray,et al.  Immunological Memory and Protective Immunity: Understanding Their Relation , 1996, Science.

[69]  M. Bevan,et al.  TCR signaling requirements for activating T cells and for generating memory , 2012, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[70]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Models of CD8+ responses: 1. What is the antigen-independent proliferation program. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[71]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  Characterizing the Dynamics of CD4+ T Cell Priming within a Lymph Node , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[72]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T Cell Activation Determined by T Cell Receptor Number and Tunable Thresholds , 1996, Science.

[73]  Jason G. Cyster,et al.  Lymph node cortical sinus organization and relationship to lymphocyte egress dynamics and antigen exposure , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  Dirk Homann,et al.  Differential regulation of antiviral T-cell immunity results in stable CD8+ but declining CD4+ T-cell memory , 2001, Nature Medicine.