Enhancing Meso Level Research in Sustainability Science—Challenges and Research Needs

Growing numbers of promising visions of the future and scenarios that may lead toward building sustainable societies are being developed. At the same time, advanced technologies and research seeds that could increase the likelihood of achieving such visions are also being rigorously conceived. Even so, we face challenges and barriers in achieving these visions due to large gaps between individual technology seeds and shared visions. In this paper we propose a “vision-meso-seeds” model as a practical framework for addressing sustainability transition and demonstrate meso level research whose primary aim is to design a matching of promising seeds at the micro level and societal visions at the macro level, facilitating an achievement of the set visions with quantified targets. In particular we highlight the importance of matching various strategies and measures derived from the top-down (vision-oriented) approach and bottom-up (seeds-oriented) approach in the meso level research. We argue that the meso level research shall constitute one of the emerging core fields in sustainability science and suggest that accumulation of knowledge through case studies be needed to enhance and verify theory, specific methods and approach necessary for advancing the meso level research in the context of sustainability science.

[1]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Remco Hoogma Experimenting for sustainable transport , 2013 .

[3]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[4]  R. Kates What kind of a science is sustainability science? , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Sustainability science: building a new discipline , 2006 .

[6]  Petra Wächter Transitions to sustainable development – new directions in the study of long term transformative change , 2012 .

[7]  David Popp,et al.  International Innovation and Diffusion of Air Pollution Control Technologies: The Effects of Nox and So2 Regulation in the Us, Japan, and Germany , 2004 .

[8]  Koichi Kitazawa,et al.  Science and Technology for Society , 2006 .

[9]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[10]  Helmut Yabar,et al.  Sustainability assessment with time-series scores: a case study of Chinese provinces , 2009 .

[11]  Y. Moriguchi,et al.  What Factors Have Changed Japanese Resource Productivity? , 2008 .

[12]  Hiroyuki Yoshikawa Synthesiology as sustainability science , 2008 .

[13]  D. Loorbach Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[14]  R. Kates,et al.  Long-term trends and a sustainability transition , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  T. Foxon A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy , 2011 .

[16]  B. Chakrabarti SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMUNICATION , 1997 .

[17]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[18]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Toward knowledge structuring of sustainability science based on ontology engineering , 2009 .

[19]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[20]  Yasushi Umeda The needs of meso level research for sustainability research and agenda of research and education of CEIDS , 2012 .

[21]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[22]  David Popp,et al.  Lessons from Patents: Using Patents to Measure Technological Change in Environmental Models , 2003 .

[23]  William A. Pizer,et al.  Instrument Choice for Environmental Protection When Technological Innovation is Endogenous , 2003 .

[24]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Innovation in pollution control , 1986 .

[25]  Y. Kajikawa Research core and framework of sustainability science , 2008 .

[26]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[27]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework , 2006 .

[28]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Crossing the Energy Divide: Moving from Fossil Fuel Dependence to a Clean-Energy Future , 2009 .

[29]  R. Kemp,et al.  The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems , 2005 .

[30]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  An R&D Management Framework for Eco-Technology , 2011 .

[31]  Johan Schot,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2002 .

[32]  G. Huppes,et al.  A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .