Diesel engine CFD simulations: Influence of fuel variability on ignition delay

Abstract The modeling of fuel chemistry within computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of diesel and other compression ignition engines is important because fuel composition and properties can significantly influence engine performance. Modern detailed chemical mechanisms containing detailed descriptions of the elementary reaction pathways can provide predictive modeling of fuel chemistry; however, they are generally far too computationally expensive for use in CFD and computational engine design and are often only available for single fuel components or simple component mixtures. We present CFD simulations of diesel engine combustion, focused on the prediction of ignition timing, carried out using an unsteady RANS approach with available sub-models to describe spray breakup physics. Chemistry is treated with a reduced global reaction model that incorporates parameters to describe fuel variability and can represent a range of real diesel and jet fuels. The derived cetane number (DCN) is used as a metric for fuel reactivity and a means to define rate parameters within the global reaction model. CFD simulations are compared to experiments from a light-duty single-cylinder diesel engine and show good agreement for ignition timing and the influence of fuel variability on ignition timing. Sensitivity analyses illustrate the relative importance of fuel variation as well as the importance of sub-models used to treat turbulence and spray breakup.

[1]  D. Rothamer,et al.  Systematic study of ignition delay for jet fuels and diesel fuel in a heavy-duty diesel engine , 2013 .

[2]  Morgan Heikal,et al.  The Shell autoignition model: applications to gasoline and diesel fuels , 1999 .

[3]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to In-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations , 2007 .

[4]  P. K. Senecal,et al.  Grid-Convergent Spray Models for Internal Combustion Engine CFD Simulations , 2012 .

[5]  Samad Jafarmadar,et al.  Multidimensional modeling of the effect of fuel injection pressure on temperature distribution in cylinder of a turbocharged DI diesel engine , 2013 .

[6]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the effects of drop drag and breakup on fuel sprays. Technical paper , 1993 .

[7]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Development and testing of diesel engine CFD models , 1995 .

[8]  Nicholas P. Cernansky,et al.  A Global Reaction Model for the HCCI Combustion Process , 2004 .

[9]  R. A. Johns,et al.  A Detailed Modelling of the Spray Ignition Process in Diesel Engines , 2000 .

[10]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  A new droplet collision algorithm , 2000 .

[11]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Fuel Spray Characteristics on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission , 1998 .

[12]  A. Lingens,et al.  A reduced thermokinetic model for the autoignition of fuels with variable octane ratings , 1994 .

[13]  M. Oehlschlaeger,et al.  Global Reduced Model for Conventional and Alternative Jet and Diesel Fuel Autoignition , 2014 .

[14]  R. Reitz,et al.  A reduced chemical kinetic model for IC engine combustion simulations with primary reference fuels , 2008 .

[15]  Mahmood Yaghoubi,et al.  Estimation of instantaneous local heat transfer coefficient in spark-ignition engines , 2010 .

[16]  R. Reitz Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[17]  Mingdi Huang,et al.  A diesel engine study of conventional and alternative diesel and jet fuels: Ignition and emissions characteristics , 2014 .

[18]  L. Kirsch,et al.  The autoignition of hydrocarbon fuels at high temperatures and pressures—Fitting of a mathematical model , 1977 .