Sensitivity of the backscattering Mueller matrix to particle shape and thermodynamic phase.

The Mueller matrix (M) corresponding to the phase matrix in the backscattering region (scattering angles ranging from 175 degrees to 180 degrees) is investigated for light scattering at a 0.532-microm wavelength by hexagonal ice crystals, ice spheres, and water droplets. For hexagonal ice crystals we assume three aspect ratios (plates, compact columns, and columns). It is shown that the contour patterns of the backscattering Mueller matrix elements other than M11, M44, M14, and M41 depend on particle geometry; M22 and M33 are particularly sensitive to the aspect ratio of ice crystals. The Mueller matrix for spherical ice particles is different from those for nonspherical ice particles. In addition to discriminating between spherical and nonspherical particles, the Mueller matrix may offer some insight as to cloud thermodynamic phase. The contour patterns for large ice spheres with an effective size of 100 microm are substantially different from those associated with small water droplets with an effective size of 4 microm.

[1]  S. Pal,et al.  Polarization anisotropy in lidar multiple scattering from atmospheric clouds. , 1985, Applied optics.

[2]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[3]  K. Liou,et al.  Geometric-optics-integral-equation method for light scattering by nonspherical ice crystals. , 1996, Applied optics.

[4]  S. Warren,et al.  Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave. , 1984, Applied optics.

[5]  Michael I. Mishchenko,et al.  Depolarization of lidar returns by small ice crystals: An application to contrails , 1998 .

[6]  A. Macke,et al.  Single Scattering Properties of Atmospheric Ice Crystals , 1996 .

[7]  K. Liou,et al.  Polarized light scattering by hexagonal ice crystals: theory. , 1982, Applied optics.

[8]  Gary G. Gibson,et al.  Discriminating between spherical and non-spherical scatterers with lidar using circular polarization: a theoretical study , 2003 .

[9]  J. Hovenier,et al.  Structure of a general pure Mueller matrix. , 1994, Applied optics.

[10]  G. Kattawar,et al.  Symmetry theorems on the forward and backward scattering Mueller matrices for light scattering from a nonspherical dielectric scatterer. , 1987, Applied optics.

[11]  W. Wiscombe.  Improved Mie scattering algorithms. , 1980, Applied optics.

[12]  L V Wang,et al.  Light backscattering polarization patterns from turbid media: theory and experiment. , 1999, Applied optics.

[13]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Identification of cloud phase from PICASSO-CENA lidar depolarization: a multiple scattering sensitivity study , 2001 .

[14]  K. Sassen.  The Polarization Lidar Technique for Cloud Research: A Review and Current Assessment , 1991 .

[15]  Z. Kam,et al.  Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1998 .

[16]  David M. Winker,et al.  PICASSO-CENA mission , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[17]  J. Hansen,et al.  Light scattering in planetary atmospheres , 1974 .

[18]  Kuo-Nan Liou,et al.  Light Scattering by Hexagonal Ice Crystals , 1981 .

[19]  L V Wang,et al.  Measurement and calculation of the two-dimensional backscattering Mueller matrix of a turbid medium. , 1998, Optics letters.

[20]  A. Ben‐David.  Mueller matrices and information derived from linear polarization lidar measurements: theory. , 1998, Applied optics.

[21]  K. Liou,et al.  Solar Radiative Transfer in Cirrus Clouds. Part I: Single-Scattering and Optical Properties of Hexagonal Ice Crystals , 1989 .

[22]  G. Rybicki.  Radiative transfer , 2019, Climate Change and Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling.

[23]  G. Kattawar,et al.  Virtues of mueller matrix imaging for underwater target detection. , 1999, Applied optics.

[24]  H. V. Hulst.  Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[25]  M. King.  Determination of the Scaled Optical Thickness of Clouds from Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements , 1987 .

[26]  Andrew A. Lacis,et al.  Scattering, Absorption, and Emission of Light by Small Particles , 2002 .