One size fits all? managing trust and privacy on social networking sites in Russia and Germany

When it comes to platform sustainability, mitigating user privacy concerns and enhancing trust represent two major tasks providers of Social Networking Sites (SNSs) are facing today. State-of-the-art research advocates reliance on the justice-based measures as possible means to address these challenges. However, as providers are increasingly expanding into foreign markets, the effectiveness of these measures in a cross-cultural setting is questioned. In an attempt to address this set of issues, in this study we build on the existing model to examine the impact of culture on the robustness of four justice-based means in mitigating privacy concerns and ensuring trust. Survey responses from German and Russian SNS members are used to evaluate the two structural equation models, which are then compared. We find that perceptions regarding Procedural and Informational Justice are universally important and hence should be addressed as part of the basic strategy by the SNS provider. When expanding to collectivistic countries like Russia, measures enhancing perceptions of Distributive and Interpersonal Justice can be additionally applied. Beyond practical implications, our study makes a significant contribution to the theoretical discourse on the role of culture in determining individual perceptions and behavior.

[1]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[2]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[3]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[4]  Joseph Bonneau,et al.  The Privacy Jungle: On the Market for Data Protection in Social Networks , 2009, WEIS.

[5]  J. Colquitt On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Dianne H.B. Welsh,et al.  Locus of Control and Entrepreneurship in the Russian Republic , 1995 .

[7]  Peter A. Rosen,et al.  Hedonic Information Systems: Acceptance of Social Networking Websites , 2006, AMCIS.

[8]  J. Giacobbe-Miller,et al.  A COMPARISON OF RUSSIAN AND U.S. PAY ALLOCATION DECISIONS, DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE JUDGMENTS, AND PRODUCTIVITY UNDER DIFFERENT PAYMENT CONDITIONS , 1998 .

[9]  Rajnandini Pillai,et al.  ARE THE SCALES TIPPED IN FAVOR OF PROCEDURAL OR DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE? AN INVESTIGATION OF THE U.S., INDIA, GERMANY, AND HONG KONG (CHINA) , 2001 .

[10]  Heng Xu,et al.  Examining the Formation of Individual's Privacy Concerns: Toward an Integrative View , 2008, ICIS.

[11]  Elena Kolesnikova,et al.  Leveraging Trust and Privacy Concerns in Online Social Networks: An Empirical Study , 2010, ECIS.

[12]  Natasha F. Veltri,et al.  Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: Explorative Evidence from Germany and USA , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Stephen R. Burant Foreign policy and national identity: A comparison of Ukraine and Belarus , 1995 .

[14]  R. Bies,et al.  Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations , 2003 .

[15]  Sung S. Kim,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model , 2008, MIS Q..

[16]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[18]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[19]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Justice for all? Progress in Research on Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Distributive and Procedural Justice , 2000 .

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Measuring Russian Culture using Hofstede’s Dimensions , 2000 .

[22]  M. Konovsky Understanding Procedural Justice and Its Impact on Business Organizations , 2000 .

[23]  Natasha F. Veltri,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2022 .

[24]  Deb Sledgianowski,et al.  Social Network Sites: Antecedents of User Adoption and Usage , 2008, AMCIS.

[25]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model , 2002 .

[27]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Web strategies to promote internet shopping: is cultural-customization needed? , 2009 .

[28]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  The Human Subject in the Psychology Experiment: Fact and Artifact , 1975 .

[30]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust , 1998 .

[31]  Qing Hu,et al.  User behaviour towards protective information technologies: the role of national cultural differences , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[32]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. , 2001 .

[33]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Is eCommerce boundary-less? Effects of individualism–collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping , 2004 .

[34]  T. L. Bradley Cultural dimensions of Russia: Implications for international companies in a changing economy , 1999 .