Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: an application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index

Incorporating Material Balance Principle (MBP) in industrial and agricultural performance measurement systems with pollutant factors has been on the rise in recent years. Many conventional methods of performance measurement have proven incompatible with the material flow conditions. This study will address the issue of eco-efficiency measurement adjusted for pollution, taking into account materials flow conditions and the MBP requirements, in order to provide ‘real’ measures of performance that can serve as guides when making policies. We develop a new approach by integrating slacks-based measure to enhance the Malmquist Luenberger Index by a material balance condition that reflects the conservation of matter. This model is compared with a similar model, which incorporates MBP using the trade-off approach to measure productivity and eco-efficiency trends of power plants. Results reveal similar findings for both models substantiating robustness and applicability of the proposed model in this paper.

[1]  Timo Kuosmanen.  Modeling Cumulative Effects of Nutrient Surpluses in Agriculture: A Dynamic Approach to Material Balance Accounting , 2012 .

[2]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  Power Industry Restructuring and Eco-Efficiency Changes: A New Slacks-Based Model in Malmquist- Luenberger Index Measurement , 2014 .

[3]  Don R. Hansen,et al.  Ecoefficiency: Defining a role for environmental cost management , 2008 .

[4]  Sushama Murty,et al.  On modeling pollution-generating technologies , 2012 .

[5]  B. Golany,et al.  Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis , 1994 .

[6]  Mustafa Akan,et al.  Dynamic pricing of remanufacturable products under demand substitution: a product life cycle model , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Bernard Penz,et al.  Capacitated lot sizing problems with inventory bounds , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[9]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[10]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[11]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Viet-Ngu Hoang,et al.  Cost and environmental efficiency of rice farms in South Korea , 2012 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[14]  B. Field.  Environmental Economics: An Introduction , 1979 .

[15]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[16]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[17]  Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh,et al.  Undesirable factors in efficiency measurement , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[18]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[19]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Justifying the incorporation of the materials balance principle into frontier-based eco-efficiency models , 2009 .

[20]  Uwe Latacz-Lohmann,et al.  Sustainability: a review of the debate and an extension , 1998 .

[21]  Xiaodan Huang,et al.  Measuring efficiency in Chinese commercial banks using a DEA model with undesirable output , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[22]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Joint Environmental and Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electricity Generation , 2009 .

[23]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  R. Färe,et al.  An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms—application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities , 1996 .

[25]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[26]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[27]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Noor Asiah Ramli,et al.  Scale directional distance function and its application to the measurement of eco-efficiency in the manufacturing sector , 2013, Ann. Oper. Res..

[29]  Olcay Kincay,et al.  An assessment of a pulp and paper mill through energy and exergy analyses , 2013 .

[30]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[31]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  The concept of joint production and ecological economics , 2001 .

[32]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  A non-parametric data envelopment analysis approach for improving energy efficiency of grape production , 2013 .

[33]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Advances in data envelopment analysis , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[34]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[36]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs , 2015 .

[37]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .

[38]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89 , 1992 .

[39]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China's iron and steel sector , 2007 .

[40]  R. Ayres,et al.  Production, Consumption, and Externalities , 1969 .

[41]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency: Some clarifications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Chih-Ching Yang,et al.  An enhanced DEA model for decomposition of technical efficiency in banking , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[44]  Behrouz Arabi,et al.  Eco-efficiency change in power plants: using a slacks-based measure for the meta-frontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index , 2015 .

[45]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs , 2013 .

[46]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[47]  Ali H. Diabat,et al.  Improved efficiency measures through directional distance formulation of data envelopment analysis , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[48]  Nurhan Davutyan,et al.  Hospital efficiency with risk adjusted mortality as undesirable output: the Turkish case , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[49]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Joint Production of Good and Bad Outputs with a Network Application , 2013 .

[50]  Guanghui Zhou,et al.  A study of carbon dioxide emissions performance of China's transport sector , 2013 .

[51]  R. Pethig,et al.  Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  William L. Weber,et al.  Characteristics of a Polluting Technology: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[53]  W. Briec.  A Graph-Type Extension of Farrell Technical Efficiency Measure , 1997 .

[54]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Undesirable inputs and outputs in DEA models , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[55]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..