Application of the computer automated structure evaluation methodology to a QSAR study of chemoreception. Aromatic musky odorants

Eighty-seven nitro-free aromatic musks and 65 of their odorless structural analogs were studied using the computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) methodology. A QSAR equation relating the strength of musky odor to 23 structural descriptors and (Log f12 was obtained. Lipophilicity appears to be less important than structural features for the strength of musky odor. A hierarchical MultiCASE analysis identified nine structural determinants responsible for the musky smell as well as seven dearomatizing fragments. This allowed speculations about the spatial requirements for interaction between a musk molecule and a hypothetical musky odor receptor. In random testing the (Multi-)CASE model was able to predict a priori 9 of 10 musky odorants and 8 of 9 odorless chemicals correctly. Forty-six nitrated musks were analyzed. Overlap was found between the structural requirements for musky odor in nitrated and nitro-free musks.

[1]  E. Theimer,et al.  Olfaction, musk odor, and molecular properties , 1967 .

[2]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  Causality in structure—activity studies , 1985 .

[3]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  A computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) approach to calculation of partition coefficient , 1991 .

[4]  P. Jurs,et al.  Structure-activity studies of musk odorants using pattern recognition: bicyclo- and tricyclo-benzenoids , 1986 .

[5]  F. Heymans,et al.  A quantitative structure-activity approach to chemoreception: importance of lipophilic properties. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  R. Nachbar,et al.  A gas chromatographic (GLPC) model for the sense of smell. Variation of olfactory sensitivity with conditions of stimulation. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Gilles Klopman,et al.  Computer simulation of physical-chemical properties of organic molecules. 1. Molecular system identification , 1981, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[8]  G. Klopman MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program , 1992 .

[9]  G. Klopman Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .

[10]  R. Axel,et al.  A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition , 1991, Cell.

[11]  L B Kier,et al.  Structure-activity studies on odor molecules using molecular connectivity. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  G Klopman,et al.  Computer-automated structure evaluation of gastric antiulcer compounds: study of cytoprotective and antisecretory imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines and -pyrazines. , 1990, Molecular pharmacology.