Automated Detection of High FDG Uptake Regions in CT Images

Combined PET-CT scan is an important diagnostic tool in modern medicine, e.g. for staging or treatment planning in the field of oncology. Especially in small structures, like a tumour, textural variations visible in a PET image are not visually recognizable within a CT scan from the same region. Thus, both modalities are necessary for diagnosis. Since both techniques expose the patient to radiation, it would be desirable to get the same information about metabolic activity contained in the PET image from a CT scan only. To investigate the relationship between both imaging modalities, we propose a machine learning approach to automatically identify regions in a CT scan corresponding to areas with high FDG uptakes in a PET image.

[1]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[3]  I. Francis,et al.  The clinical role of CT/PET in oncology: an update , 2005, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[4]  Simon Wan,et al.  Tumor Heterogeneity and Permeability as Measured on the CT Component of PET/CT Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  A. Gallamini,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology , 2014, Cancers.

[6]  Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen Gabor features in image analysis , 2012, IPTA.

[7]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  L. Schrader,et al.  Application of machine learning methodology for pet-based definition of lung cancer , 2010, Current oncology.

[9]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  J. Ruhlmann,et al.  Clinical PET in oncology. , 2000, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear.

[11]  Shahriar B. Shokouhi,et al.  Classification of benign and malignant masses based on Zernike moments , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[12]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Classification of thresholded regions based on selective use of PET, CT and PET-CT image features , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  S J Riederer,et al.  Image metric‐based correction (Autocorrection) of motion effects: Analysis of image metrics , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods for feature selection with nonmonotonic criterion functions , 1994, Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 3 - Conference C: Signal Processing (Cat. No.94CH3440-5).

[15]  von F. Zernike Beugungstheorie des schneidenver-fahrens und seiner verbesserten form, der phasenkontrastmethode , 1934 .

[16]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[17]  Ze Jin,et al.  Automated method for extraction of lung tumors using a machine learning classifier with knowledge of radiation oncologists on data sets of planning CT and FDG-PET/CT images , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[18]  F-18 FDG-PET and PET/CT Imaging of Cancer Patients , 2008 .