Comparing Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles From Inversion of Surface-Wave Phase Velocities with Downhole Measurements: Systematic Differences Between the CXW Method and Downhole Measurements at Six USC Strong-Motion Sites

INTRODUCTION Shear-wave velocity profiles are used in a variety of engineering and seismological applications, and several methods are available to determine the velocities, including borehole and surface-wave methods (Woods and Stokoe, 1985; Stokoe et al. , 1988; Stokoe etal. , 1994; Poran et al. , 1994; Poran et al. , 1996). Surface-wave methods offer the advantage of being non-invasive and less costly than boreholes, but their reliability needs to be established by comparison with more direct methods. The best way to do this is a “blind” test in which the velocities determined independently from surface-wave and borehole measurements at the same site are compared. By “blind” we mean that the determination of the shear-wave velocity profile by the two methods were done independently of one another. It is surprisingly difficult to find situations in which the velocity determinations are truly independent of one another. We report on one such case in this paper. In...

[1]  C. Wills.  Differences in Shear-Wave Velocity due to Measurement Methods: A Cautionary Note , 1998 .

[2]  David M. Boore,et al.  Site amplifications for generic rock sites , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Keith L. McLaughlin,et al.  A geology-based 3D velocity model of the Los Angeles basin sediments , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  S. Day.  RMS response of a one-dimensional half-space to SH , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  R. Borden,et al.  New Approach to Interpretation of Noninvasive Surface Wave Measurements for Soil Profiling , 1996 .

[6]  David M. Boore,et al.  Estimation of ground motion at deep-soil sites in eastern North America , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  In Situ Seismic Testing of Hard-to-Sample Soils by Surface Wave Method , 1988 .

[8]  K. Stokoe,et al.  SHALLOW SEISMIC EXPLORATION IN SOIL DYNAMICS. , 1985 .

[9]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  The effect of Quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979 , 1981 .

[10]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake; a revision of OFR 96-740 , 1999 .

[11]  David M. Boore,et al.  Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake; a revision of OFR 96-740 , 1999 .

[12]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake , 1996 .

[13]  E. Ferguson.  In Situ Measurements , 1982 .

[14]  James F. Gibbs,et al.  In-situ measurements of seismic velocity at 19 locations in the Los Angeles, California, region , 1981 .

[15]  James F. Gibbs,et al.  In-situ measurements of seismic velocity at 27 locations in the Los Angeles, California region , 1980 .

[16]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Estimation of ground motion parameters , 1978 .