Possibility Theory, Belief Revision and Nonmonotonic Logic

This paper is a brief overview of joint work done with Salem Benferhat and Jerome Lang, at IRIT in Toulouse on the application of possibility theory to automated reasoning under uncertainty. A noticeable aspect of this research is that although first motivated by Zadeh's interpretation of fuzzy sets as elastic constraints, possibilistic logic has developed in close connection with the mainstream research in belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Especially, Gardenfors' revision postulates leads to an epistemic entrenchment ordering of pieces of knowledge that can be encoded by means of a necessity measure only. And possibilistic logic turns out to belong to the family of preferential logics after Shoham, that unify most of the existing nonmonotonic logics.

[1]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Epistemic Entrenchment and Possibilistic Logic , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  The Probable and the Provable. , 1977 .

[3]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  The Logic of Theory Change , 1991, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility Theory - An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty , 1988 .

[5]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Expressing Independence in a Possibilistic Framework and its Application to Default Reasoning , 1994, ECAI.

[6]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Belief Revision , 1995 .

[7]  N. Rescher,et al.  On inference from inconsistent premisses , 1970 .

[8]  D. Dubois,et al.  Belief Revision: Belief change and possibility theory , 1992 .

[9]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment , 1993, IJCAI.

[10]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Plausible reasoning , 1976 .

[11]  L. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty , 1992 .

[12]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases , 1993, UAI.

[13]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in Flux , 1988 .

[14]  E. Hisdal Conditional possibilities independence and noninteraction , 1978 .

[15]  G. L. S. Shackle,et al.  Decision Order and Time in Human Affairs , 1962 .

[16]  Marialuisa N. McAllister Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty (Didier Dubois and Henri Prade with the collaboration o f Henri Farreny, Roger Martin-Clouaire, and Claudette Testemale; E. F. Handing, trans.) , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Necessity Measures and the Resolution Principle , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Nonmonotonic Inference Based on Expectations , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[19]  H. Prade,et al.  Possibilistic logic , 1994 .

[20]  Gerhard Brewka,et al.  Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense By Gerhard Brewka (Cambridge University Press, 1991) , 1991, SGAR.

[21]  C. E. Alchourrón,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985 .

[22]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Handling Uncertainty, Context, Vague Predicates, and Partial Inconsistency in Possibilistic Logic , 1991, Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Control.

[23]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representing Default Rules in Possibilistic Logic , 1992, KR.

[24]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inconsistency in possibilistic knowledge bases: to live with it or not live with it , 1992 .

[25]  David Makinson,et al.  General Theory of Cumulative Inference , 1988, NMR.

[26]  J. M. Larrazabal,et al.  Reasoning about change , 1991 .

[27]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  What does a Conditional Knowledge Base Entail? , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[28]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[29]  Richard C. T. Lee,et al.  Symbolic logic and mechanical theorem proving , 1973, Computer science classics.