Reliability of accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior in school-aged children: a 12-country study.

OBJECTIVES Focused on the accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary time metrics in 9-11-year-old children, we sought to determine the following: (i) number of days that are necessary to achieve reliable estimates (G⩾0.8); (ii) proportion of variance attributed to different facets (participants and days) of reliability estimates; and (iii) actual reliability of data as collected in The International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and Environment (ISCOLE). METHODS The analytical sample consisted of 6025 children (55% girls) from sites in 12 countries. Physical activity and sedentary time metrics measures were assessed for up to 7 consecutive days for 24 h per day with a waist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+. Generalizability theory using R software was used to investigate the objectives i and ii. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed using SAS PROC GLM to inform objective iii. RESULTS The estimated minimum number of days required to achieve a reliability estimate of G⩾0.8 ranged from 5 to 9 for boys and 3 to 11 for girls for light physical activity (LPA); 5 to 9 and 3 to 10, for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA); 5 to 10 and 4 to 10 for total activity counts; and 7 to 11 and 6 to 11 for sedentary time, respectively. For all variables investigated, the 'participant' facet accounted for 30-50% of the variability, whereas the 'days' facet accounted for ⩽5%, and the interaction (P × D) accounted for 50-70% of the variability. The actual reliability for boys in ISCOLE ranged from ICCs of 0.78 to 0.86, 0.73 to 0.85 and 0.72 to 0.86 for LPA, MVPA and total activity counts, respectively, and 0.67 to 0.79 for sedentary time. The corresponding values for girls were 0.80-0.88, 0.70-0.89, 0.74-0.86 and 0.64-0.80. CONCLUSIONS It was rare that only 4 days from all participants would be enough to achieve desirable reliability estimates. However, asking participants to wear the device for 7 days and requiring ⩾4 days of data to include the participant in the analysis might be an appropriate approach to achieve reliable estimates for most accelerometer-derived metrics.

[1]  A. Okely,et al.  Assessing volume of accelerometry data for reliability in preschool children. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  I. Janssen,et al.  Dose-response relation between physical activity and blood pressure in youth. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Applying generalizability theory to estimate habitual activity levels. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  M. Pearce,et al.  Stability of habitual physical activity and sedentary behavior monitoring by accelerometry in 6- to 8-year-olds. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[6]  E. Wickel Reporting the Reliability of Accelerometer Data with and without Missing Values , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Identifying children's nocturnal sleep using 24-h waist accelerometry. , 2015, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  N. Wareham,et al.  Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision. , 2008, Journal of physical activity & health.

[9]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  M. J. Allen Introduction to Measurement Theory , 1979 .

[11]  E. Hinckson,et al.  Week-to-week differences of children's habitual activity and postural allocation as measured by the ActivPAL monitor. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[12]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  How Many Days Are Enough? A Study of 365 Days of Pedometer Monitoring , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[13]  P. Freedson,et al.  Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Fully automated waist-worn accelerometer algorithm for detecting children's sleep-period time separate from 24-h physical activity or sedentary behaviors. , 2014, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[15]  G. Cardon,et al.  International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Objectively Measured Physical Activity, Physical Activity Related Personality and Body Mass Index in 6-to 10-yr-old Children: a Cross-sectional Study , 2008 .

[16]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Gregory J. Welk,et al.  Technical Reliability Assessment of the Actigraph GT1M Accelerometer , 2010 .

[18]  G. Welk,et al.  Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Mark S Tremblay,et al.  Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  B. Taylor,et al.  Longitudinal study of physical activity and inactivity in preschoolers: the FLAME study. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  A Catalog of Rules, Variables, and Definitions Applied to Accelerometer Data in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006 , 2012, Preventing chronic disease.

[22]  Vincent Onywera,et al.  The International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE): design and methods , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[23]  Minsoo Kang,et al.  The minimum number of days required to establish reliable physical activity estimates in children aged 2–15 years , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[24]  John J Reilly,et al.  Validity, practical utility, and reliability of the activPAL™ in preschool children. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  How many days was that? We're still not sure, but we're asking the question better! , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  R. Mcmurray,et al.  Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  Lars Bo Andersen,et al.  Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the Actigraph activity monitor , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[31]  S. Marshall,et al.  Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: sedentary Behaviour. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[32]  Vincent Onywera,et al.  Improving wear time compliance with a 24-hour waist-worn accelerometer protocol in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE) , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[33]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[34]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.