Identifying strategic management concepts: An analytic network process approach

This paper presents an approach to the identification of an organization's strategic management concepts (SMCs) - mission, vision, values and competences. The highly qualitative relationships among these concepts are operationalized using the Analytic Network Process (ANP). As ANP captures the outcome of dependence and feedback between components of elements, the proposed approach enables us to handle indirect relationships and complex interactions existing among the SMCs. The alternatives with the highest overall priorities, resulting from the ANP, are selected as the organization's most dominant SMC set. To improve the quality of the decision further analysis of the ANP results is suggested. Accordingly, alternative concept sets are derived by applying two approaches - bottom-up and top-down. The bottom-up approach indicates an explorative perspective where only common values and core competences held by the organization are used to identify the corresponding mission and vision statements. On the other hand, the top-down approach indicates a normative perspective where the necessary values and competences are determined according to a given desired vision statement. The proposed ANP approach has been applied to the Industrial Engineering Department (IED) of Istanbul Technical University. In light of the dominant, bottom-up and top-down sets, a final set of SMCs has been suggested for the IED.

[1]  T. Saaty.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[2]  Müjgan Sagir Ozdemir,et al.  Validity and inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process , 2005 .

[3]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[4]  A. Victor Cabot,et al.  An introduction to management science , 1977 .

[5]  P. Harker.  Derivatives of the Perron root of a positive reciprocal matrix: With application to the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[6]  Ron Sanchez.  Research in Competence-Based Management , 2008 .

[7]  Maureen Meadows,et al.  How To Develop Visions: A Literature Review, and a Revised CHOICES Approach for an Uncertain World , 2001 .

[8]  T. Saaty.  Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[9]  T. Saaty,et al.  Why the magic number seven plus or minus two , 2003 .

[10]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[11]  P. Harker.  Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[12]  William J. Stevenson,et al.  Introduction to management science , 1992 .

[13]  P. Harker,et al.  Globally effective questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[14]  T Furuichi,et al.  A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  D. Reibstein,et al.  Wharton On Dynamic Competitive Strategy , 2006 .

[16]  P. Harker.  Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[17]  Seçkin Polat,et al.  SCENARIO-BASED COMPETENCE DESIGNATION , 2005 .

[18]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[19]  T. Saaty.  Decision making — the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP) , 2004 .

[20]  Umut Asan,et al.  A fuzzy approach to value and culture assessment and an application , 2007, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[21]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  REDUCTION OF PAIRWISE COMPARISONS IN DECISION MAKING VIA A DUALITY APPROACH , 1999 .

[22]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[23]  J. Ra.  Chainwise Paired Comparisons , 1999 .

[24]  Charles I. Stubbart,et al.  Advances in Applied Business Strategy , 1984 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the relativity of relative measures - accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Michael E. Raynor.  That vision thing: Do we need it? , 1998 .

[27]  M. Javidan,et al.  Core competence: What does it mean in practice? , 1998 .

[28]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Diagnosis with Dependent Symptoms: Bayes Theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1998, Oper. Res..

[29]  Müjgan Sagir Özdemir,et al.  Validity and inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[30]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .